Sorry, I might need to repeat this again, to be the best or better you need to be consistent. The number of Valencia played great than Nani in 09/10 and 11/12 are more. You just said Nani started slow in 09/10 while Valencia played great from the start of 09/10 until the end. Got brace in a some games doesn't mean you are better. Valencia was the one gave the two assists to Nani against Bayern anyway.
Nani has been very consistent, his numbers suggest so. If Nani plays, Nani delivers - it's as simple as that. Nani was the better player in 09/10.
Nani
3 goals, 10 assists, 1585 league minutes.
Valencia
5 goals, 9 assists, 2613 league minutes.
Nani is more likely to contribute goals/assists.
I already told you 10/11 Nani was better since Nani played great in many games unlike in 09/10 he started slow.
Nani was the best player in the league that year, point blank period!
11/12 Valencia was better.
No he wasn't, just because Skysports or a large portion of English fans don't like Nani doesn't mean Valencia was the better winger that season. He won the award just because of his comeback after his gruesome injury & the determination he showed into steering us back into winning ways.
Statistically in 11/12 season,
Nani scored 8 goals, 12 assists in 2104 league minutes. Valencia scored 4 goals & 14 assists in 2,124 league minutes. Valencia played more minutes but Nani contributed more in (goals + assists).
Before you go on about statistics being a miniskirt, I should make you aware that
statistics are facts and not the musings of Gary Neville or the romanticism of Jamie Redknapp on Skysports.
The average English fan loves a trier. The player that looks busy without necessarily doing a good job gets more cheers than the one that is silently and effectively going about his business. This is why many English fans would tell you Andy Caroll or Grant Holt are better than Berbatov.
12/13, 13/14 Nani spent his times with his injury consistently which mean he's not playing much games to prove himself as a better player than Valencia.
And how's that Nani's fault that he has been injured for most parts in the last 2 seasons? Fact remains if Nani cops minutes under his belt, he delivers.
In 12/13,
Nani played only 630 league minutes and scored a goal + 3 assists. Valencia played 2207 minutes and scored a goal + 7 assists.
In terms of minutes/creativity, who is the better player in your own view? The one that struggles to add meaningful contribution to the team with the obscene amount of minutes he gets or the one who contributes more even when he plays lesser minutes?