Who's Kissing Cameras?
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2016
- Messages
- 6,898
We are well stocked on wingers. He looks a brilliant talent but we won’t be buying him.
Not good onesWe are well stocked on wingers. He looks a brilliant talent but we won’t be buying him.
It would be such a smart move to sign him in January. Won’t cost a bomb and an excellent winger. 20-25m would do it.
no chance you get him for 20-25m....he woudl be at least double that amount.It would be such a smart move to sign him in January. Won’t cost a bomb and an excellent winger. 20-25m would do it.
He's a great talent. Neto is a decent comparison I guess, although Mudryk is a better athlete and has more trickery in his locker. So maybe he's closer to Rashford. Also absolutely deadly on the counter.
There were talks about him going to Brentford and that would have been amazing for his development. I don't think he's ready for a top club yet. But I also hope he doesn't stay too long in Ukrainian league, like some of our similar talents did back in the day (Yarmolenko and Konoplyanka).
Less hyped, but Illya Zabarnyi (CB) is another very promising player to keep an eye on.
No, he won’t cost 50m. I don’t know if you paid attention but he was available for under 15m at the start of the window. Then when Arsenal became interested in him, Shahktar put a price of under 30m because it was the close to the end of the window. He has openly said he would like to leave this January again and multiple reports have put the price around that figure. Of course you never know in football but I don’t think he would cost that much.no chance you get him for 20-25m....he woudl be at least double that amount.
He's a quality player though and we certainly could use more help on the wing play
The vibe I’m getting.Gives me Bale-Neto-Nedved vibes.
you may want to read this articleNo, he won’t cost 50m. I don’t know if you paid attention but he was available for under 15m at the start of the window. Then when Arsenal became interested in him, Shahktar put a price of under 30m because it was the close to the end of the window. He has openly said he would like to leave this January again and multiple reports have put the price around that figure. Of course you never know in football but I don’t think he would cost that much.
No, he won’t cost 50m. I don’t know if you paid attention but he was available for under 15m at the start of the window. Then when Arsenal became interested in him, Shahktar put a price of under 30m because it was the close to the end of the window. He has openly said he would like to leave this January again and multiple reports have put the price around that figure. Of course you never know in football but I don’t think he would cost that much.
Rashford has a few of those goals like vs Ajax andLeipzig. How is he against settled defences that I expect Shakhtyor plays alot against in Ukraina?
He is heavily linked with arsenal and it is rumored Shak Donetsk want 50m+ in summer. Now may be even more. He is quality.no chance you get him for 20-25m....he woudl be at least double that amount.
He's a quality player though and we certainly could use more help on the wing play
you may want to read this article
https://www.sportskeeda.com/footbal...-must-pay-a-lot-money-sign-21-year-old-target
Different times. Ukrainian clubs weren’t in financial crisis then but you might be right even after that. Looks like I underestimated his price that was mentioned before. He ain’t gonna be cheap after all if they are rejecting 30m.You do realise we signed someone from Shaktar for £54m, who didnt have half as much hype as this kid?
I'm not sure he's got any more than 2 months worth of gametime as a starter for Shakhtar in the Ukrainian league, so there's not much to assess, he has a bunch of assists, but not many goals. He's someone who's caught the eye of people early, because of performances in some big CL and international games. As a league performer, he's still basically a relative novice, despite being 21.It shows the issues with player development and general organisation in recent years of ukrainian football (obviously since 2014 developing football has not been high on the agenda) that a player with obvious ability like he does, barely has played a full season of football. If Shakhtar had not lost so many players due to the war, he might not even have been given these recent opportunities as a starting player.
No, he won’t cost 50m. I don’t know if you paid attention but he was available for under 15m at the start of the window. Then when Arsenal became interested in him, Shahktar put a price of under 30m because it was the close to the end of the window. He has openly said he would like to leave this January again and multiple reports have put the price around that figure. Of course you never know in football but I don’t think he would cost that much.
I really like this guy every time I see him in the CL or Europa.
He's 2 footed, absolutely rapid and very direct. Say it quietly but he reminds me a bit of a young Giggs on the left.
He'll be at a top side within 2 years 100%
Definitely! he's got that beautiful turn of speed and directness just like Kanchelskis too.he could follow in the same path as another great Ukrainian winger that came to United after spending time with Shaktar....
Rashford has a few of those goals like vs Ajax andLeipzig. How is he against settled defences that I expect Shakhtyor plays alot against in Ukraina?
Full Name: Mykhaylo Mudryk
Date of Birth: Jan 5, 2001 (21)
Nationality: Ukraine
Height: 175cm
Position: Attack - Left Winger
Foot: Right
Player Agent: Alik Football Management
Current Club: Shakhtar Donetsk
Joined: Jan 9, 2021
Contract Expires: Dec 31, 2026
Date of Last Contract Extension: Feb 13, 2022
Outfitter: Nike
Buy him when he's evolved into Marshtomp.
Clearly very dangerous on the counter but unsure how he'd adapt against sides that sit deep.
He could always be converted into an incredible LWB if that's an issue though.
Kvaratskhelia is better. Is more dynamic, has more maturity to his game right now and is a more varied dribbler. Mudryk has top potential though. Both have pace but Mudryk at full tilt is frightening.Who is better between him and the Napoli winger?
Who is better between him and the Napoli winger?
Kvaratskhelia is better. Is more dynamic, has more maturity to his game right now and is a more varied dribbler. Mudryk has top potential though. Both have pace but Mudryk at full tilt is frightening.
I don't know, but to be fair the nights get even colder and muddier in Ukraine and Poland (where I think the club trains now that Ukraine is being bombed by a madman)Can he do it on a cold, muddy night in Stoke?
Imagine if we had both Kvara and Mudryk, instead of Rashford/Sancho pair and also a capable, not injury-prone striker...We need to go all in for one of either this guy or Kvaratskhelia, that would transform our attack completely.
Ten Hag has set us up to play dominating football, we will require flair in our team to open teams up.