WeePat
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2015
- Messages
- 19,607
- Supports
- Chelsea
He's tried it twice now. He goes on some weird WUMs.Desperate act but not even close.
Antony’s having a bit of a redemption season so far. In the spirit of will smith, Take our boy’s name out of your mouth!
Heard that too, he's definitely done if that's the case.Sharapova got busted for the same thing. He's fecked.
Can clubs purchase insurance against this sort of thing?
Seems like someone should offer that given the huge sums of money involved.
Which they really shouldn't - otherwise they'd have to do the same to all teams wanting to save money by sacking players for a ban for things like drugs, drink, betting addictions.Terminating his contract would save us an estimated £33.8m in wages over the remainder of his contract. However, we’d need to swallow the full £47m loss on his current amortised value in one big hit. Unless the FA/UEFA gave us special dispensation for this it’d completely wreck PSR/FFP
a smackhead’s life has been completely turned upside down and you’re worried about psr!?Terminating his contract would save us an estimated £33.8m in wages over the remainder of his contract. However, we’d need to swallow the full £47m loss on his current amortised value in one big hit. Unless the FA/UEFA gave us special dispensation for this it’d completely wreck PSR/FFP
Chelsea fans might know better but I’m pretty sure that dragged on for years and I don’t think he’s paid anything back yet?Chelsea can simply take this to court if it's compensation they're after. they did the same after Mutu failed the drug test and he had to pay around 17 mill. to them.
Anyone know the crack with this?
I remember an olympic skier losing his medal for a drug test but it was traced to an olbas oil sniffy stick that had had an ingredient change.
Could it be innocuos or is it looking like some proper doping?
Mudryk is understood to be citing contamination and denies deliberately taking a banned substance. He had a test in August that was clear but a subsequent test returned a positive result for the banned substance. Mudryk is still waiting for the result of the B sample and is expected to make a statement today.
Mudryk is believed to claim that he has not changed anything in his routine since the August test. However, it is thought he believes that any form of contamination must have happened while he was abroad because the substance involved is not thought to be available in the UK. Chelsea have launched their own investigation but are said to be supportive of their player, who is fully cooperating with the club.
Regarding the suspension
Under FA regulations, a player can be notified of a test result and then provisionally suspended while being given the opportunity to provide an explanation before any decision regarding a charge.
The precise details of the case remain unclear but since last Friday The Times has been in correspondence with a specialist sports law firm acting for Mudryk. It has stated repeatedly that its client has not been charged with any form of doping offence.
These drugs aren’t like a magic pill that gives players superhuman skills or abilities. They help with recovery and stamina. So yes, an unfair advantage but it’s not like they turn a shit player who can’t dribble a football into Messi.If that is what he plays like on PEDs, I wouldn’t want to see him off them.
Chelsea fans might know better but I’m pretty sure that dragged on for years and I don’t think he’s paid anything back yet?
if Chelsea can now terminate his contract.. oh man what a get out of jail card.
Just wait for Rashford to get doneSeems very convenient that it's the highly paid unwanted players that are getting caught. Are we going to see Rodri or Vinicius fail a doping test?
Not at all. His wages are not particularly high and we'd lose any chance of getting any money from a transfer/loan fee, that's before you even look at the FFP implications.
Chelsea absolutely wouldn't want to terminate his contract.
Seems very convenient that it's the highly paid unwanted players that are getting caught. Are we going to see Rodri or Vinicius fail a doping test?
How many teams do you think are going to be interested in buying or loaning a banned player?
Once his ban is over, plenty.
There's examples of players who have served doping bans being bought for good money.
Once his ban is over, plenty.
There's examples of players who have served doping bans being bought for good money.
Fred was banned for a doping offence when he was playing in the Ukrainian league. Like all players who get done, he didn't serve the maximum 4 years and it didn't stop him getting a move to one of the biggest clubs in the world.Were any of those players as unproven as Mudryk though?
He's on 100k a week and has looked way out his depth at this level. If he gets a four year ban he'll be 28 before he is playing again. Which clubs would be interested in that?
There have been a lot of positives for this in Eastern Europe. He assumes responsibility for anything in his body and he'd have to mount a very compelling explanation to get out of it.Anyone know the crack with this?
I remember an olympic skier losing his medal for a drug test but it was traced to an olbas oil sniffy stick that had had an ingredient change.
Could it be innocuos or is it looking like some proper doping?