Ubik
Nothing happens until something moves!
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2010
- Messages
- 19,408
Usually when you can see something a manager is trying to change in a team, you're willing to overlook poorer results as you can see the ends justifying the means. This is, I believe, what most were referring to being willing to wait for when saying "we'll give him time". Time to show something in the manner of playing, in his managerial style, anything really that shows potential. I'd been willing to come up with excuses for most of the season, hopeful that at some point there would come a point when you would see what was being moved towards. It's not particularly surprising then that, after our most abject performance came at home to our fiercest rivals just last Sunday, many finally gave up. Something should have been shown by now. The bad results aren't going towards anything, they're just bad results. My personal take on it anyway.A lot of people say they were *once* prepared to give Moyes time, but no longer are because of the poor results. But doesn't that defeat the whole objective of the concept of giving a manager time?
I mean, it's easy to say they should be given time if the results are satisfactory to good. Because then there's no obvious reason not to give them time, is there?
The test of how much you really believe in giving a manager time to implement his vision surely only comes when things aren't going as well you'd like.
Of course, i'm not saying Moyes should remain Manchester United manager indefinitely, regardless of the results. But i'm not sure 8 months is 'time' either, especially given he was arguably walking into the hardest job in world football.