And the shocking marking for the first goal. If a defensive midfielder plays a big part in two goals conceded it's a stretch to say he had a good game.Honestly don't know what match people were watching. Apart from the poor clearance just before their second goal, I thought he and Herrera were bossing the midfield.
Herrera played a part in two of the goals we scored. Schneiderlin was the main culprit in both goals we conceded. Herrera was fantastic. Schneiderlin clearly wasn't and was one of our poorer players.
That's fair, to an extent. But I think as a team we had a lot of mindless clearances today -- both Blind and Carrick had some silly ones. Schneiderlin was just somewhat unlucky that his led to a goal, in my opinion. Poor marking for the second no doubt, but I think Rojo should have gotten it. Anyway, other than that I agree with those who said he had a strong game.And the shocking marking for the first goal. If a defensive midfielder plays a big part in two goals conceded it's a stretch to say he had a good game.
Honestly don't know what match people were watching. Apart from the poor clearance just before their second goal, I thought he and Herrera were bossing the midfield.
Yeah, I'm one of his biggest critics... and even I thought he had a good, especially in the second half... was getting around the pitch, breaking up play and really high energy. The only issue with him I had was tactical, in that sometimes he'd continue the press up the field and be way out of his DM position when Arsenal were coming forward... (there was one point in the first half where him and Herrera were are two furtherst men forward and Juan Mata was holding!) - but I think that was a direction from LVG, so I won't blame him too much for that...
His decision making does let him down at times - but yeah, more games like the second half will definitely be a step in the right direction
I don't see how you can have a good game whilst also being responsible for arsenal even being in the game at all. We win 3-0 without his mistakes.
I like how MOTD did a bit on him showing the job he did on Ozil.
He was at fault for both goals, but he was great. I really think him and Herrera is a partnership we should be using more and more. Both are mobile and aggressive.
I like how MOTD did a bit on him showing the job he did on Ozil.
I don't think anyone said that.Supposed to be the best box to box since Roy Keane if I would believe the comments last season, he puts in a lot of effort and his interceptions are valuable but other than that, hope he's still acclamatising.
I don't see how you can have a good game whilst also being responsible for arsenal even being in the game at all. We win 3-0 without his mistakes.
I know people have mentioned at Southampton he was more of a creative outlet, but ive seen nothing in his play so far for us that leads me to believe he can spray balls that can unlock a defence like a more all rounded central midfielder/no.8. I'm comfortable with us building the side around him shielding the back 4, but if were expecting him to get assists, spray the ball around, release runners with through balls, im not convinced he's that player.
Agree 100% on him and Herrera part. They should always play together whether it's with a #10 in front of them, or Carrick/Schweinsteiger behind them.
We would have conceded if he didn't make those mistakes imo. We were 'lucky' not to concede on other occasions.
Had we drawn or lost people would be furious with him.So we conceded two goals which were directly his fault and were lucky not to concede on other occasions as well (This against an Arsenal team who have found goals increasingly hard to come by of late) and the conclusion is somehow that he had a great game? Is this for real?