This basically shows your take on the player if you think he's ten a penny and players like him are readily available. And yet only clubs making exorbitant offers (which they're doing of their own volition) stand a chance of purchasing him.Well as he isn't a generational talent I wouldn't lose my sleep over it , we already have great DM and Caicedo level talent are always emerging in the Market hopefully we will find one even if we miss out on Caicedo .
It remains to be seen what level of talent he goes on to become. He's 21-years old, which is insanely young for a CM or DM, in fact, there's far, far, far less who were at their established peak or levelled out prime at that age than were, to be talking about 'generational'. Some of the literal best in those positions of all time had done nothing like Caicedo has at the tender age of 21, and if you have a 21-year old DM or CM already at his best at that age, you're talking about a Cesc or Pedri type glitch in the matrix prodigy and certainly not the normal trajectory of even the elite in those roles.
If these talents were always emerging, we wouldn't see them constantly going for £80m plus. Tchouaméni, Rice and Caicedo are all in the same or thereabouts bracket in terms of what other clubs were willing to pay. If there were an abundance, Declan Rice for sure is not sold for £105m and West Ham wouldn't have had the leverage they do, nor would Brighton.
This denigration of Caicedo should at least make sense; people mightn't like the player, but that shouldn't belie market trends and why these valuations can be placed on the table in the first place.
Last edited: