NicolaSacco
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2016
- Messages
- 2,962
- Supports
- Ipswich
From a war Israel started.
Come on, man. I thought that some of your thinking was blinkered early on, but this really takes the biscuit.
From a war Israel started.
What was wrong about what he said? Its common knowledge that Israel started the six day war.Come on, man. I thought that some of your thinking was blinkered early on, but this really takes the biscuit.
Come on, man. I thought that some of your thinking was blinkered early on, but this really takes the biscuit.
What was wrong about what he said? Its common knowledge that Israel started the six day war.
Fired the first shots. To say they started it is to deliberately avoid the context. I cannot believe that someone could accidentally come to that kind of black and white opinion.
Do you ever get to a point in a debate with someone where you realise that there is absolutely no point continuing? That's me, now.What was blinkered about my thinking beforehand and how did Syria start the 67 war?
Do you ever get to a point in a debate with someone where you realise that there is absolutely no point continuing? That's me, now.
For someone who appears to be quite well informed on matters in the Middle East, to reduce the origins of the six day war into some binary, black and white opinion, can only come from a pre-formed agenda.
There is context and nuance to literally every single conflict in history. That includes the current conflict in Gaza, the six day war, WW2, WW1, Russia Ukraine, Japan’s colonial conquests, American revolution , civil war, 30 year war, Punic wars and any one of a number of anti colonial revolutions that sprung up .
I can very happily and easily say that Hamas started this current conflict. Or that Russia started the war. Or that Germany started WW1. Those are factual statements. None of those statements are an analysis of the morality of their attacks or the underlying factors why they may have acted why they did.
Regardless factually they did ‘start’ the hot conflict with the actual attack.
Please feel free to block me or not engage with my posts if you feel you’ve reached that stage, instead of insulting my views. I refrained from doing so despite the only slight criticism you were able to offer about Israel being the now almost 60 year occupation and settlement of 700k people in a territory another people call their own.
It's more ideological bad faith rather than cluelessness. The amounts of hypocrisy and gaslighting when it comes to this criminal rogue state are astounding.It's fascinating how many Westerners despite their weird obsession with the region still have no clue what they're talking about every time they discuss it.
Nice final sentence, which, whilst being apparently about me, says an awful lot about you, and your intentions in this conversation. I see you.
Good summary (graphic)
I’m sorry, I don’t really know how to engage with this line of argument.
Israel will listen because America will give them huge amounts of money for free, instead of slightly more than huge amounts of money for free. It’s why I gave the example I gave above. My child beat someone up so to discipline them, I’m buying them the Nintendo switch, not the ps5. That will show them.
[...]
@Raoul When it opened YouTube there was one of those fact-checker messages underneath saying that it wasn’t filmed in Syria. Just FYI.
Fair enough. Didn't see that bit about the first tweet. Was mainly looking at the other 20 odd tweets in the thread.
It's also a false hypothetical, because this isn't something that happens currently. The US have had governments before that could use aid politically like that, but with Biden at the helm it does not, and it isn't very likely to change with Trump because Israel is an easy way to keep the party happy while he does his own thing.
Well quite. However, despite being the blinkered one, I was attempting to engage in good faith in a hypothetical universe where the USA apparently punishes Israel through secret means. Which is great cos it means we don’t even need to know about or question it.
A perfectly logical thing to do to bring extra stability to a country.Israel says it has destroyed 80 percent of the Syrian army’s capabilities
Israeli Army Radio said that Israel’s air force has completed the main part of the military operation it began in Syria, called Operation Arrow of Bashan/Golan, and that it has destroyed about 80 percent of the Syrian army’s military capabilities.
Army Radio added that since the start of the operation on Sunday night, the Israeli military has destroyed warplanes, combat helicopters, surface-to-air missile batteries, Scud and cruise missiles, drones, weapons depots, and ammunition manufacturing sites, army sites and facilities connected to Iran, and sunk 15 missile boats.
The ground operation in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights east of the ceasefire line is continuing, Army Radio said.
Totally normal behaviour.
Oh jeez, you’re still angry?!
It was a relatively simple concept. Enjoy the rest of your evening, fella
"Concept" is a weird description. It was you making a wrong claim about how the US provides aid and other benefits to Israel.
I didn’t make any kind of wrong claim.
I was expecting a reply along those lines. I think Israel does incur costs for its actions, mainly economic, but that they are almost always kept secret. The US will always support Israel in the UN, and save their criticisms for private. As far as I know Trump is the only president who has recognised Israel’s West Bank settlements as legal, all others haven’t, and this will have made the Israeli governments life more difficult, and the settlements themselves less economically viable.
The problem is, if the US ‘only’ gives Israel $40 billion in aid, where it had previously planned to give $50 billion, it doesn’t look like a consequence, but it is.
Yes, you did. This is you making a claim about how aid to Israel is decided on. It's wrong, so it's a wrong claim:
Your speculations rely on US public support for Israel being stronger than the private support. With the current administration in particular, that isn't just wrong, it's the complete opposite of reality. It's why we have seen countless lies about red lines and such; the actual private support for Israel is so insanely strong that it looks bad even to an extremely pro-Israeli American public, so the American government have to pretend to be more critical than they really are. In reality they don't mind Israel blocking aid, helping gangs steal what little comes through, or things like the ground invasion of Rafah. But, in public, they pretended to disapprove.
“It is wrong, so it is a wrong claim” has to be amongst the worst attempts at proof I’ve ever seen.
Please can we leave it there.
A perfectly logical thing to do to bring extra stability to a country.
That wasn't an attempt at a proof. I have to assume you know that, so what are you trying to do with this? Especially if you don't want to engage, that makes it extra weird.
That’s absolutely fine. Think I’m weird. Now let’s stop clogging up this board.
A perfectly logical thing to do to bring extra stability to a country.
Nothing says a country is in existential peril than it being engaged in 5 aggressive wars at once.All Israel acting in self defence. This was actually a conflict Syria started and actually sinking a country’s fleet and destroying all of its air defences is a perfectly normal thing to do which isn’t a declaration of war.
Etc etc etc.
Nothing says a country is in existential peril than it being engaged in 5 aggressive wars at once.
It is easier I think when you consider Netanyahu's age. He wants to remain out of prison for the time he has left. I doubt he is thinking beyond the next 5-10 years.It’s an interesting long term geopolitical strategy really. Basically have to hope that they/the USA maintain perpetual military superiority in the region.
It’s a waste of time talking to people like them. They get themselves into knots trying to explain and defend Israel when it flies in the face of reality and morality.Yes, I kind of had to assume you're fine with it when you're making things like that up for no gain, it'd presumably be a reaction you anticipated. The alternative is that you actually thought it was an "attempt at a proof", but I'm really struggling believing that can be true.