Am I the only one who thinks this is all a bunch of BS and those who think he is somehow employed by city is just your regular paranoid everyone is against us footy fan?
why the feck would city think they need to pay off a ref to beat us?
I'm kind of torn.
I'm perhaps naive enough to think that he and the others who have reffed out in UAE wouldn't intentionally give City favourable decisions, or teams that could affect City bad ones. There is unconcious bias though. We know that's a condition that human beings are suscepitble to.
To be honest, that can even go both ways. Some people may be aware that they could come across as biased towards one team due to certain circumstances and then go out of their way to prove they're not and end up giving bad decisions against that team. It's different, but lots of people have said Gary Neville does this when it comes to commentary/punditry, favouring non-United teams with the things he says because he might be afraid of being accused of being biased towards us. Over-compensating.
City absolutely wouldn't need to pay someone off to beat us to answer that question directly.
I think it might be better that he is nowhere anything to do with City or their rivals though, just from a PR point of view or else people are going to ask questions. I think it's natural people are going be worried about conflicts of interest given the circumstances. From that point of view he was stupid to accept referreing out there, as were the other other officals. At the same time I'm sure they were all paid handsomely so difficult to resist.