Tom Van Persie
No relation
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2012
- Messages
- 27,793
I can't stand him and I hate how Sky push the Keane/Richards duo.
Ex-FootballerHow did this guy even become a pundit? It's like they took out a semi stoned college boy out of his dorm and put him in the studio. His constant fake laughing outbursts remind you of those frat parties where some stoner laughs at his own fart joke and when it comes to serious debate he brings nothing to the table.
Guffawing idiot who's presence is merely a box ticking exercise.
If you offered United board an interim manager who would guarantee us top 4, or Rangnick who would miss out on top 4 but would "find out about the squad", then I'm pretty sure they'd have taken the former. Missing out on CL football sets us back years.Gary summed it up nicely in that Ranick is not here to be judged on his coaching ability. He’s literally here to find out about this squad and the club as a man on the inside and the use that to plan for the longer term.
Bringing in someone like Conte does nothing for us long term, just like with Mourinho.
If you offered United board an interim manager who would guarantee us top 4, or Rangnick who would miss out on top 4 but would "find out about the squad", then I'm pretty sure they'd have taken the former. Missing out on CL football sets us back years.
The issue was simply the United board didn't know who was most likely to get us top 4 out of the potential interims they interviewed, no one garauntees success on the pitch. Rangnick most likely came across best out of those they spoke to, and he had the added bonus that he could help the club off the pitch beyond this season.
But make no mistake, the interim manager was brought in primarily to rescue the season and meet the bare minimum targets (CL qualification). The narrative that the United board weren't arsed about this season and were happy to finish mid-table under Ralf because it would help us long-term strikes me as nonsense. They wanted the best of both worlds, Ralf to rescue the season and provide off the pitch expertise on top of that. Unfortunately it's not worked out in terms of results.
Now, I'm not even criticising the club, the decision on who to appoint was spinning the roulette wheel and hoping for the best. There was at least some logic to appointing Ralf, it's easy to say with the benefit of hindsight we should have gone with someone else. Maybe on paper Valverde could have been the most logical choice, but it was reported that he only wanted the job permanently.
I see them as equals.
Garbage comment. You can dislike his punditry without this nonsense insinuation?Guffawing idiot who's presence is merely a box ticking exercise.
There have been other black Sky pundits so this too is a pretty shit take. Most likely he's entertaining and has a net positive effect on ratings. Not every pundit needs to be analytical. Bunch of weirdos bringing his race into this.He’s basically been cast in the Eddie Murphy role, and a lot of black people celebrate it as representation and great for diversity. There are plenty of black footballers who have played the game to a high level that can probably offer more insight than Richards. I’m not even sure the rest of the panel care much about his views.
Garbage comment. You can dislike his punditry without this nonsense insinuation?
There have been other black Sky pundits so this too is a pretty shit take. Most likely he's entertaining and has a net positive effect on ratings. Not every pundit needs to be analytical. Bunch of weirdos bringing his race into this.
Without going into the race thing (I have no interest nor opinion on the matter), I find this to be very surprising - he is asked to provide analysis, he is not there as some sort of buffoon to amuse the panel or the crowd. It's actually a key component of his job, for which he's paid, and where he intervenes across a variety of shows.Garbage comment. You can dislike his punditry without this nonsense insinuation?
There have been other black Sky pundits so this too is a pretty shit take. Most likely he's entertaining and has a net positive effect on ratings. Not every pundit needs to be analytical. Bunch of weirdos bringing his race into this.
Annoying cnutWhat's the box?
The lack of understanding not just from Richards but generally over Rangnick's role is just bizarre. The clue is in the title "Interim manager". He's not going to be the permanent manager, he's there purely as a stop gap because most managers don't want to take over during the season. Chelsea have done it a couple of times as well previously, it's nothing new.
Why did he burst out laughing after Keane’s scathing but accurate rant about United giving up, not putting in the effort, etc? What was so funny about it? Is Micah happy to just be the Show Clown? Perhaps he should take a peek at Keano’s trophy cabinet and compare it to his, the smug tosser.
The lack of understanding not just from Richards but generally over Rangnick's role is just bizarre. The clue is in the title "Interim manager". He's not going to be the permanent manager, he's there purely as a stop gap because most managers don't want to take over during the season. Chelsea have done it a couple of times as well previously, it's nothing new.
To be fair to him, he tried to say he completely agreed with Keane but his go to response when things are tense is to laugh like a fecking clown. Him and Keane are great to watch when it's neutral but you can't put them together when City and United play each other.Why did he burst out laughing after Keane’s scathing but accurate rant about United giving up, not putting in the effort, etc? What was so funny about it? Is Micah happy to just be the Show Clown? Perhaps he should take a peek at Keano’s trophy cabinet and compare it to his, the smug tosser.
Is this a serious post?He’s basically been cast in the Eddie Murphy role, and a lot of black people celebrate it as representation and great for diversity. There are plenty of black footballers who have played the game to a high level that can probably offer more insight than Richards. I’m not even sure the rest of the panel care much about his views.
Burst onto the scene at 18.
Bursts out laughing when others are speaking.
Maybe we should be worried he might spontaneously burst into flames one day?
I mean... He's not down the pub with his mates. He's tragically unprofessional, this just highlighted it even more. I'd feel the same if one of our ex players acted in that manner on live TV after battering Liverpool or City (though I'm not taking much risks here, that's as unlikely as Micah developping brain cells).I understand it. For him, as an ex-City player, I'm sure he found it hysterical. If you're an ex-City player and you see Keane suffering, having watched our boys toss it off, I get why you'd be reveling in it.
I was getting to annoyed at him ranting at Gary. Was just spouting out nonsense but because he was louder he thought he was making good points.
Of course he’s a diversity pick.
…Because there aren’t that many ex-Man City players around to represent them in the media, in a sea of ex-Utd and ex-Liverpool pundits.
Duh
He’s a rubbish pundit who has stumbled upon a formula that works for TV.
Incredibly lucky that he came onto the scene during City’s dominance so he basically just gets to sit there and laugh every game because it usually goes exactly how he wants it. Never had to do any in depth analysis and just sits there looking all smug before and after games as if he’s part of it.
Because he's a fecking idiot.Why did he burst out laughing after Keane’s scathing but accurate rant about United giving up, not putting in the effort, etc? What was so funny about it? Is Micah happy to just be the Show Clown? Perhaps he should take a peek at Keano’s trophy cabinet and compare it to his, the smug tosser.
That is literally Sky Sports to a tee these days. ‘Heated’ debates and ‘Shocking’ revelations, there’s really not that much to talk about in football (United have been poor for a while, City are a great team, it kind of went as expected yesterday in all honesty) so they have to fill the airtime with ‘entertainment’. Genuinely how many times has Keane done that exact same ‘rant’ since he joined or Gary been ‘worried’ about things.I was getting to annoyed at him ranting at Gary. Was just spouting out nonsense but because he was louder he thought he was making good points.
I was very happy with how Gary reacted to it, kept calm, didn't raise his voice, and highlighted the stupid shouting.That is literally Sky Sports to a tee these days. ‘Heated’ debates and ‘Shocking’ revelations, there’s really not that much to talk about in football (United have been poor for a while, City are a great team, it kind of went as expected yesterday in all honesty) so they have to fill the airtime with ‘entertainment’. Genuinely how many times has Keane done that exact same ‘rant’ since he joined or Gary been ‘worried’ about things.
As much as I hate to admit it, he does tick a lot of boxes. Black, Ex footballer and probably Man City's only homegrown in media. He's not particularly knowledgeable or analytical but he rarely has any polarizing takes, is somewhat jovial, in shape so looks good in a suit, hence palatable to the masses. Think if you remove black box that he ticks, he still gets on TVGarbage comment. You can dislike his punditry without this nonsense insinuation?
There have been other black Sky pundits so this too is a pretty shit take. Most likely he's entertaining and has a net positive effect on ratings. Not every pundit needs to be analytical. Bunch of weirdos bringing his race into this.
At least he's authentic, the same goes for Keane's cliché tough guy boomer act.
Whereas Neville is just an unbearable pseudo-(football)intellectual, who talks out of his rear end as much as anyone on these panels, but tries to pass it as if he's some analytical voice of reason, to the point of trying to put down Richards in quite a condescending fashion.
I like Micah but this is so trueThe type of guy you'd block from your WhatsApp group for posting 200 emojis and never saying anything worth listening to.