Madrid's midfield got dominated every time they came up against a very good team this season and they don't get one bit of criticism for it from non-Madrid fans. They're actually getting praise for it.
I think you'll find that the weak aspect of the Real side is their defence. I don't have statistics in front of me regarding possession, territory, etc, but I do know that Real scored 94 in the league this season, only 5 less than Barcelona. They also won the Champions League, almost entirely due to the number of goals that they scored, although it helps when they're handed goals on a plate, as they were in both the semi-finals and final.
However, it's blindingly obvious that Ronaldo is past his best, and to claim that at this point in time he is a better player than Messi is just stupefyingly ignorant! (I find it hard to believe that people claimed this in the past, but to claim it today is literally unbelievable). Undoubtedly, he is still an excellent poacher, and he will score goals in most teams, and a lot of goals in a team like Real Madrid who dominate virtually every game.
If the team doesn't make chances for him, he will do nothing. As he did in the Champions League final. He will now contribute absolutely nothing else at all. Because he can't run past people, he can't dribble at a high level, his passing is mediocre, he doesn't have the skillset that Messi does.
That's why Messi tops every statistical category in La Liga (even goalscoring, which is Ronaldo's only contribution). Because he has this unique skillset, which no-one else possesses. There is no-one else that does and can do what Messi does. Look at the statistics for all of the top leagues, he is the only player who even comes remotely close to topping all of the categories. That's because no-one else can do what he does, because he's a unique talent.
You must surely have noticed that Ronaldo plays, as Graeme Souness put it, "the width of the box". He's a poacher. He doesn't do anything else. He can't do anything else now.
It's literally unbelievable that people could argue against this, or claim that Ronaldo makes more of a contribution than Messi. By arguing against this you're demonstrating either:
(a) you're completely biased and incapable of being even remotely objective;
(b) you don't understand football at all;
(c) you are literally blind and cannot see what players do on the field of the play;
(d) you are willing to go against the blanket opinion of pundits and experts, who all say that Ronaldo isn't the player that he used to be;
(e) a combination of the four.
You can see in the video, which I've referenced previously, "Lampard and Ferdinand on the argument of Messi not winning a WC and on Messi vs Ronaldo" that Rio Ferdinand says precisely this.
So at this point your argument is...because Real Madrid won the Champions League, Ronaldo is a better player, even though he didn't do anything in the final. But he can still take credit for the final, and he's still better than Messi, even though Messi completely outperformed him in every way this season apart from not winning the Champions League, which is Messi's fault, even though he's been playing an absolute blinder all season.
And although Messi has a far superior skillset to Ronaldo, which is absolutely obvious and even on this thread no-one has tried to refute this, Ronaldo is still the better player, because he scored more goals, even though he scored less goals in La Liga where they can be directly compared, he doesn't do anything else other than score goals, virtually all of this goals are tap-ins, whereas Messi scores tonnes of brilliant and inspired goals. For example, he broke the La Liga free-kick record this season, whereas Ronaldo is now about as likely to score a free-kick as I am.
When Messi was winning the Champions League that wasn't fair because he was in a better team, and he won due to his team, even though Messi was the standout player by miles, but when Ronaldo wins the Champions League in a better team, Ronaldo deserves the primary credit for this, even when he does nothing and they mainly win due to Gareth Bale!
To say that these arguments beggar belief is an understatement!
I was listening to a radio programme the other day, the only decent one on TalkSport, and the presenter Andy Jacobs said "I don't know how anybody could think that Cristiano is better than Leo Messi". The simple answer is because some people are incapable of being objective. Anyone objective will conclude that Messi is better. He just clearly is the better footballer. Anyone who claims otherwise is just making themselves look ridiculous.