Kevin
Nostrodamus of football
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2002
- Messages
- 13,813
Only scores Tap ins
Serious question - how has Messi been doing at PSG?
The debate is over now. Messi is looking like a bum in a farmers league whilst Ronaldo is dragging this horrible Man United side on his own.I'm not saying he is, I'm just saying that a lot of people have tuned down their ambitions by a huge margin since the begining of the season.
Also, unless either Messi or him accomplish something huge this season (PL/CL title for United, CL title for Messi, World cup masterclass for either of them), the debate will never be "over".
Thera no doubting they've been the best two players over the last 12/15 years and I wouldn't argue with anyone's choice of the greatest because you can argue cases for them both. However, food for thought.
Ronaldo has done it for every club he's played for across different countries. Messi has only ever done it in Spain and let's not forget as good as Messi is he's always done it in a better side than Ronaldo. Not forgetting Messi was surrounded by world class players all his life.
Will Messi still be doing what Ronaldo does at 36?
I just know it would swing in Ronaldo’s favour now.We want less polls, not more.
No city player since their inception is close to Ronaldo’s level even at his current age. He sets the benchmark and records wherever he goes. I’m almost certain he’d surpass 50 goals with a creative team like theres.I don’t think so, no City player has scored more than 33 goals in all competitions in a season under Pep. He’s more likely to score more goals for us than City, as we are a moments team and indulge him. City would rotate him and do weird things with him.
Bayern, he’d be good, but not as good as Lewandowski, but he’d hit 30-40.
No city player since their inception is close to Ronaldo’s level even at his current age. He sets the benchmark and records wherever he goes. I’m almost certain he’d surpass 50 goals with a creative team like theres.
The Lewandowski point is debatable. He’s being playing in a far more functional team for the past 3 years. Ronaldo at Bayern in the Bundesliga would be a sight to behold.
No city player since their inception is close to Ronaldo’s level even at his current age. He sets the benchmark and records wherever he goes. I’m almost certain he’d surpass 50 goals with a creative team like theres.
The Lewandowski point is debatable. He’s being playing in a far more functional team for the past 3 years. Ronaldo at Bayern in the Bundesliga would be a sight to behold.
It is debatable, at his peak absolutely but current Ronaldo is still very good but not that good in my opinion.
The quality of the team does not necessarily equal goalscoring. The top scorer in the league frequently doesn’t come from the champions. Look at Chelsea for example. City have a massive spread of goals. Would be the same with any player there.
Not actually, Spain and Germany look on the same level right, especially considering Barcelona current state(which will last for a couple of more seasons at least).
As a matter of fact, i don't see how current La Liga is better than Bundesliga... Spain was better, yes 3 years ago with Cr7 and Messi in, but not now.
Judging Bayern Munich goalscoring is useless, they can score for fun against anybody right now, if Lewandowski is fit.
Serious question - how has Messi been doing at PSG?
You do, I don't, my impression is that few people do. Hence, let's agree to disagree.Just because you haven’t, doesn’t mean no one has
What did you answer? Di Stefano is clearly rated very highly due to his Real Madrid exploits and not his single Copa win for Argentina.I answered your question, you couldn’t answer mine.
I was specifically talking about the group stage of the Copa this year where 4 teams qualify from groups of 5You do realise that every single goal Ronaldo has ever scored in a major international tournament apart from 3 has been in the ‘useless group stages’, right?
Are there not more players best known for their scoring exploits who cost world record fees than players best known for their dribbling?Dude, there’s a bunch of dribblers there who had world record fees. You already named them. Dearie me.
You're clearly a leading member of the Messi brigade here.a) I obviously never said that, nor am I a member of any ‘brigade’. It’s quite tough to be good in the air when you are 5’6.
b) being good at passing/playmaking is obviously much more important than being good at heading so I don’t know why you are bringing up heading apropos of nothing.
I have seen many of the WC games he was involved in, but a very big proportion of his club games were friendlies with questionable defending.Watch the full games. Starting with the one I suggested. The notion that that England team (and many others at the time) lacked defensive organisation is frankly laughable.
You do, I don't, my impression is that few people do. Hence, let's agree to disagree.
What did you answer? Di Stefano is clearly rated very highly due to his Real Madrid exploits and not his single Copa win for Argentina.
I was specifically talking about the group stage of the Copa this year where 4 teams qualify from groups of 5
Are there not more players best known for their scoring exploits who cost world record fees than players best known for their dribbling?
You're clearly a leading member of the Messi brigade here.
I was just pointing out the fact that when it comes to judging Ronaldo, the Messi brigade members' opinions count for very little. Most of you think he only scores tap ins, but Messi can do no wrong and was probably MotM when Barca crashed out of the CL by big scores every time.
I have seen many of the WC games he was involved in, but a very big proportion of his club games were friendlies with questionable defending.
The debate should really be over at their age but Ronaldo is having an all time great career from 30 years onwards alone.it’s supernatural at this stageHe's hammering nails in the coffin of the debate really, isn't he?
Probably the greatest post 34/35 year old in history. Is that one even debatable?The debate should really be over at their age but Ronaldo is having an all time great career from 30 years onwards alone.it’s supernatural at this stage
I’m trying to do quick math in my head it’s 335 goals in 370 odd games since turning 30!Probably the greatest post 34/35 year old in history. Is that one even debatable?
He's hammering nails in the coffin of the debate really, isn't he?
inCRedible.I’m trying to do quick math in my head it’s 335 goals in 370 odd games since turning 30!
Good for you, as a Barca/PSG (probably) supporter.I’d take Messi 2019 to present as a whole over Ronaldo so no
Good for you, as a Barca/PSG (probably) supporter.
To move to the PL/CL at 36, and rip it up, definitely beats moving to an oil club in a nothing league and doing the bare minimum.
Good for you, as a Barca/PSG (probably) supporter.
To move to the PL/CL at 36, and rip it up, definitely beats moving to an oil club in a nothing league and doing the bare minimum.
Who was the best when both are compared at their peak?
Longevity is important but shouldn’t become the defining factor when regarding ‘the greatest of all time’ at anything really.
Keith Richards has had more longevity than Jimi Hendrix, but who was the best when both were at their peak?
This is not up to debate. Ronaldo, and it's not even close. Garduiola Barca team was called the best in the history, yet they couldn't even win 2 CL in a row, and their both CL was due to heavy referee help, especially that against Chelsea, which was the biggest robbery in the football to date.
But still with this blatant cheating, Messi has 3 CL where he was the figure, he actually have 4, but he was a reserve and i don't see a reason to count it.
Ronaldo have 5 CL, 4 in RM in 5 years time, and they won CL 3 straight time, and no one was even close to do it twice, forget about doing it three times. Especially in RM he was the main reason for this CL, and even with us.
The numbers speaks for itself: 8, 17, 16, 12, 15 is the goals he scored.
Should we even say that Real name was, Round of 16, before Ronaldo moved to them and transformed them ? And they are also doing a great job after he leave as well.
And European Championship > Copa, as Copa is a joke of tournament.
Since 2004, there was obviously 5 European Championship, while there is 7 Copa. Just look at this numbers, 2015 Copa, 2016 Copa, 2019 Copa, 2021 Copa, what is this joke ? Not to mention the quality of the teams is like 10x lower, and that you have like 1-2 hard matches before the Final. There is no such things as qualifications, and from a groups of 5, 4 team is moving forward, like really ? And on top of that, you have exactly 3 more matches to win.
Prime for prime, the only thing Messi had over Ronaldo was his dribble, and that's it. Ronaldo was obviously a better header player, more stronger physically, faster on both accelerating and top speed, better with the weak foot(if we call them equal with the strong one), best positioning in probably the whole history, a true leader and way more clutch, and he was also an absolutely monster 1 on 1, as people looking him currently loves to forget that. But they both were great in beating players 1on1.
I’d take Messi 2019 to present as a whole over Ronaldo so no
Serie A not a major league? Not sure as someone who supports a La Liga team you can say that given the state of your league last few years.ah yes, even though he hasn’t won a meaningful trophy since 2018. He’s good at 36, but having united finish worse than they did last year in the PL isn’t helping
both Madrid’s are comfortably better than any bundesliga side bar Bayern.
Serie A not a major league? Not sure as someone who supports a La Liga team you can say that given the state of your league last few years.
This is not up to debate. Ronaldo, and it's not even close. Garduiola Barca team was called the best in the history, yet they couldn't even win 2 CL in a row, and their both CL was due to heavy referee help, especially that against Chelsea, which was the biggest robbery in the football to date.
But still with this blatant cheating, Messi has 3 CL where he was the figure, he actually have 4, but he was a reserve and i don't see a reason to count it.
Ronaldo have 5 CL, 4 in RM in 5 years time, and they won CL 3 straight time, and no one was even close to do it twice, forget about doing it three times. Especially in RM he was the main reason for this CL, and even with us.
The numbers speaks for itself: 8, 17, 16, 12, 15 is the goals he scored.
Should we even say that Real name was, Round of 16, before Ronaldo moved to them and transformed them ? And they are also doing a great job after he leave as well.
And European Championship > Copa, as Copa is a joke of tournament.
Since 2004, there was obviously 5 European Championship, while there is 7 Copa. Just look at this numbers, 2015 Copa, 2016 Copa, 2019 Copa, 2021 Copa, what is this joke ? Not to mention the quality of the teams is like 10x lower, and that you have like 1-2 hard matches before the Final. There is no such things as qualifications, and from a groups of 5, 4 team is moving forward, like really ? And on top of that, you have exactly 3 more matches to win.
Prime for prime, the only thing Messi had over Ronaldo was his dribble, and that's it. Ronaldo was obviously a better header player, more stronger physically, faster on both accelerating and top speed, better with the weak foot(if we call them equal with the strong one), best positioning in probably the whole history, a true leader and way more clutch, and he was also an absolutely monster 1 on 1, as people looking him currently loves to forget that. But they both were great in beating players 1on1.