Joemo
whistling in the wind
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2012
- Messages
- 8,342
Quality of the game wasn't great, and Feyenoord's midfield was horrific but he looks very good.
Quality of the game wasn't great, and Feyenoord's midfield was horrific but he looks very good.
Oh yeah, great fun no doubt. But the midfield for Feyenoord was non-existent for the lasts 30 minutes. Still, he's clearly extremely technically gifted and has good physical attributes. He's a real talent, would love to see him at United. A real rough diamond that could be polished.Quality of the game wasn't great, you right about that . But it was alot a fun to watch .
Himself, Strootman and Vlaar would seriously balance the squad
Ten goals in thirteen matches. That is impressive. 22 shots on target of a total of 69 is not. 37 off target, 4 on post and ten blocked. 37 of 69 shots from outside the box. Nani v2.0?
Himself, Strootman and Vlaar would seriously balance the squad
He has also reached 40 league goals before Van Persie and Robben, although the Dutch league is not what it used to be.
Different type players but for a LW he's gonna well surpass Hazard age 20 season.
20 goals and 16 assists.
In what way? He's not as talented.
In terms of productivity I guess.In what way? He's not as talented.
Different type players but for a LW he's gonna well surpass Hazard age 20 season.
20 goals and 16 assists.
In what way? He's not as talented.
, for a winger of that age, its just fantastic. There are hardly strikers of the age 20 who can speak of such stats.
Ten goals in thirteen matches. That is impressive. 22 shots on target of a total of 69 is not. 37 off target, 4 on post and ten blocked. 37 of 69 shots from outside the box. Nani v2.0?
http://www.npo.nl/nos-studio-sport-eredivisie/20-12-2014/POW_00917956 For those who want to see more of him, Dutch equivalent of MotD, the PSV match was first. Great goal and some great actions.
Bit of a free role, he can play as an out and out winger, but as the best man in the attack, the coach allows him to take initiative and play more centrally when needed.After watching a video of his performance at the weekend he seemed to be picking the ball up centrally quiet a bit. I always thought he was an out and out winger but does he play as more of a 10 for PSV?
Probably the game is about a lot more than goals and assists.If he gets the same assists and by the looks of it a lot more goals at the same age how can you say he's not as talented?.
Bit of a free role, he can play as an out and out winger, but as the best man in the attack, the coach allows him to take initiative and play more centrally when needed.
Probably the game is about a lot more than goals and assists.
Yes because life is absolutely black and white. Obviously it's not possible to dribble past 2 and assist the assister. Great dribblers only beat players and selfishly smash shots into orbit. But if you want to keep simplifying the game and dumbing it down to "G+A", carry on.Indeed but goals win games not dribbling past 10 players, creating space for your team and shooting awfully at goal.
Yes because life is absolutely black and white. Obviously it's not possible to dribble past 2 and assist the assister. Great dribblers only beat players and selfishly smash shots into orbit. But if you want to keep simplifying the game and dumbing it down to "G+A", carry on.
Did I say we shouldn't have bought Ronaldo or that we shouldn't buy delay?If that's they way you are going to argue your point, Ronaldo comes to mind and taking your view on thing we should not have bought him either.
Yes because life is absolutely black and white. Obviously it's not possible to dribble past 2 and assist the assister. Great dribblers only beat players and selfishly smash shots into orbit. But if you want to keep simplifying the game and dumbing it down to "G+A", carry on.
How about we stick to what one has actually said?So Ronaldo is not as talented as Hazard either?
The same way Paul Scholes can be better than Frank Lampard, or Ronaldhinio better than Henry.How can one player not be as talented as another if they're producing more end product on the field?
Let's also recap and go back to my initial point which was that a player can be better than another or isn't necessarily worse than another despite/due to less goals and assists. Not that a player with lesser statistics or better dribbling ability is definitely better than another who scores more.Lets recap on I never said one was better than the other, I just said those brilliant stats at 21 by Hazard look like they'll be broken by Depay.
The same way Paul Scholes can be better than Frank Lampard, or Ronaldhinio better than Henry.
.
You seem awfully concern with how others make their points when yours are so poorly formed.Scholes CM/Play Maker/ CAM vs Lampard CAM/Second Striker .. Ronaldinho CAM vs Henry Striker
Hazard LW vs Depay LW or both CAM
Not exactly the best way to back up your point.
Kinda, but its more similar to Ronaldo's role who is allowed to play more centrally at times. If you want to get a view of Depay, just think of Ronaldo, they are so similar that its scary. 25 million pounds will rather be a max, PSV cant resist such a bid.Similar to the role Hazard has at Chelsea then? He really seems to have stepped up this season. Can't imagine we will be able buy him for much less than £25 million he keeps this up. LVG might swing the balance in our favour if other clubs are interested.
You seem awfully concern with how others make their points when yours are so poorly formed.
So if this guy is a "CAM" is he more talented than Zidane/Ronaldhinio? I mean, how is it possible if he out scores one of them at the age of 20, right?
Heck , did Ronaldo put up such numbers at 20?