RedStarUnited
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2008
- Messages
- 8,308
He really should be able to do what he done for Fellaini's chance more often.
Because kicking the ball out of play is as difficult as scoring a goal? Don't be ridiculous.Yes, much in the same way as I wouldn't call Smalling pathetic for missing a one on one, you've completely exaggerated an error that most players playing in his position would've made anyway.
He's a winger. It's part of the job description. If he wants to be excused defensive responsibilities then he'll need to do a lot better when he's attacking.
He's a winger. That's where he's being played. That involves defending. He doesn't do anywhere near enough while attacking to justify his complete lack of work ethic going back.He's a forward, he needs to play as part of a front three or not at all. He's a good player, let him play.
Why are so many making it out as if he never runs back, he was back every time we were defending and he did make a tackle. Yes he's not the best defensively but he's a Winger ffs
Or at RB, for that matter.Yeah I'd agree with that. He's just not very good at LB
Make your mind up, you were applauding his work getting back a few posts ago.He's a winger. That's where he's being played. That involves defending. He doesn't do anywhere near enough while attacking to justify his complete lack of work ethic going back.
I said it made a refreshing change to see him actually attempt to get back into a defensive position. My mind has been firm in him being both reluctant to defend and shite when he actually bothers.Make your mind up, you were applauding his work getting back a few posts ago.
Clearly, you originally didn't bother to acknowledge how well he did going forward, concentrating on the defensive aspect of an attacking player instead.I said it made a refreshing change to see him actually attempt to get back into a defensive position. My mind has been firm in him being both reluctant to defend and shite when he actually bothers.
He was okay going forward. One good move and one shit shot that rebounded to Rooney. Defence is part of his job and his failure to do it cost us a goal in the last minute.Clearly, you originally didn't bother to acknowledge how well he did going forward, concentrating on the defensive aspect of an attacking player instead.
So you down play his involvement in the goal but highlight his part in the one we conceded? His shot led directly to the goal and a cross that should've lead to another, his challenge was proceeded by two failed clearances, a deflection and failure to charge down a cross properly before they scored! Your bias is showing a little here...He was okay going forward. One good move and one shit shot that rebounded to Rooney. Defence is part of his job and his failure to do it cost us a goal in the last minute.
Now the goal is because of Depay's failure, credit to you for holding on so long..So you down play his involvement in the goal but highlight his part in the one we conceded? His shot led directly to the goal and a cross that should've lead to another, his challenge was proceeded by two failed clearances, a deflection and failure to charge down a cross properly before they scored! Your bias is showing a little here...
Eh?Now the goal is because of Depay's failure, credit to you for holding on so long..
Look at the third goal about from a minute earlier. He does not track back and lets Janmaat cause a 3 vs 2 against Darmian and covering CM. As a result Darmian is all over the place and a cross comes in and play develops further resulting in the goal. The problem was he got lazy and took the easy option of a token gesture of pressing their central defender and stayed upfield in no mans land instead of tracking his man. In the final minutes protecting a slender lead, having been on for 30 or so minutes, imo that defending was criminal.
I actually saw that in real time and was thinking this is going to feck us.
Agreed, though I think you're being harsh. It was another bright cameo, which included a nice run to destabilise Newcastle's defence - which led to Rooney's goal - and then a wonderful cross to Fellaini, who should have scored. However, as soon as he came on, our left side was exposed and we looked terrible defensively, and I don't think that's a coincidence. He's used to not putting a shift in - often playing high on the left, waiting for an opportunity to counter the opposition, which explains why he's inept defensively.He's a winger. That's where he's being played. That involves defending. He doesn't do anywhere near enough while attacking to justify his complete lack of work ethic going back.
Start against Liverpool?
I don't think hitting a shit shot and a striker having to hit a great strike to lead to a goal is a particularly strong piece of attacking play. He did very well for Fellaini's chance. My only bias is towards what is best for Utd. Depay has been a flop so far. His attacking play has not justified his awful defensive play.So you down play his involvement in the goal but highlight his part in the one we conceded? His shot led directly to the goal and a cross that should've lead to another, his challenge was proceeded by two failed clearances, a deflection and failure to charge down a cross properly before they scored! Your bias is showing a little here...
A winger is part of the midfield. Two central midfielders can't deal with their central midfield and their full backs.I think as a winger it's pretty normal to not sprint back every time you concede possession. The midfield are supposed to shift across to offer the numbers whilst the team falls into a defensive shape, no?
Not at all, were you in the other player threads equally criticising players there after every mistake? You've made a conscious effort to exaggerate mistakes and downplay the frankly very good aspects of his performance. From your comments it's evidently clear you've already decided he was shit and no performance would change your mind, you've not viewed the game objectively at all.I don't think hitting a shit shot and a striker having to hit a great strike to lead to a goal is a particularly strong piece of attacking play. He did very well for Fellaini's chance. My only bias is towards what is best for Utd. Depay has been a flop so far. His attacking play has not justified his awful defensive play.
Do you go into every player thread after a game? Try not to be a hypocrite about this. I don't think he's particularly good, you're right. Performances like last night won't change that because any good he did going forward was negating by his part in us dropping two points. I won't be engaging with you anymore however as you're going on ignore. Enjoy.Not at all, were you in the other player threads equally criticising players there after every mistake? You've made a conscious effort to exaggerate mistakes and downplay the frankly very good aspects of his performance. From your comments it's evidently clear you've already decided he was shit and no performance would change your mind, you've not viewed the game objectively at all.
A winger is part of the midfield. Two central midfielders can't deal with their central midfield and their full backs.
That's not how we play at all.In most one striker systems .. Wingers are in attack, not midfield
You are being harsh, ignore his position as every player has a responsibility to defend, but other defensive players made less attacking contribution and were equally as poor defensivelyDo you go into every player thread after a game? Try not to be a hypocrite about this. I don't think he's particularly good, you're right. Performances like last night won't change that because any good he did going forward was negating by his part in us dropping two points. I won't be engaging with you anymore however as you're going on ignore. Enjoy.
That's not how we play at all.
Its not even as if he didnt defend, he did, but didnt get the ball. Watched the highlights and it's nowhere near as big of a deal as he's making, he makes it look as if he just stood there doing nothing.You are being harsh, ignore his position as every player has a responsibility to defend, but other defensive players made less attacking contribution and were equally as poor defensively
Its not even as if he didnt defend, he did, but didnt get the ball. Watched the highlights and it's nowhere near as big of a deal as he's making, he makes it look as if he just stood there doing nothing.
Okay. If you think our wide players aren't expected to defend then there's no point debating with you.Are you purposely obtuse? We play with two wingers, who last night were more inside forwards than anything else, they cut inside, especially Memphis..