Some would say he has proven that his level is higher than the Championship.He’s still a championship manager.
Some would say he has proven that his level is higher than the Championship.He’s still a championship manager.
The same way Pep was a Barca B manager and Zidane was a Castilla manager.
Some would say putting McKenna in the same bracket as Pep and Zidane a bit over the top, no?Some would say he has proven that his level is higher than the Championship.
Some would say putting McKenna in the same bracket as Pep and Zidane a bit over the top, no?
Not saying McKenna is a poor manager, just the difference between managing championship to prem being massive.I am not putting him in the same bracket at all. Just mentioning that him having managed in league 1 and the championship so far doesn't make him a championship manager. A few top managers going around these days have done it without going to through the grind and have proven themselves to be good enough. (In McKenna's case he actually has gone through the grind).
ThisNot saying McKenna is a poor manager, just the difference between managing championship to prem being massive.
Kompany won the Championship last year with more points and more convincingly, being talked about as the next City manager. Look where Burnley are now.
It's fair to say he's in the same bracket as them at the same point in their career, and I'll even put Ipswich higher than Barca B and Castilla.Some would say putting McKenna in the same bracket as Pep and Zidane a bit over the top, no?
They're clearly not saying that. McKenna's experience is much more impressive than those two if you only take their B team experience. The question for McKenna is what does the rest of his career hold? Will he ever even win a single major title, let alone multiples like they have done.Some would say putting McKenna in the same bracket as Pep and Zidane a bit over the top, no?
The only drawback in appointing McKenna now is his lack of experience in the PL.Not a Tuchel fan but if it stops Southgate coming here I'd take him.
McKenna would be a great longer term solution but I think we need to sort the culture out before we look his way.
It’s all irrelevant as I can’t imagine INEOS being desperate/daft enough to employ him.It's fair to say he's in the same bracket as them at the same point in their career, and I'll even put Ipswich higher than Barca B and Castilla.
Didn’t workout great with Jose did it? Mind you I firmly believe had Woodward backed him and got rid of Pogba we just might have seen something special for a couple of seasons. We will never know.A tiny part of me wouldn't mind a gamble on a manager like McKenna but I'm so tired of gambles that haven't paid off. Years of wasted time.
Would love to just have a proven world class manager with a top record. I don't think that's too much to ask for at a club as big as United.
Problem is anyone half decent is tied down elsewhere.
He's a dark horse for sure.It’s all irrelevant as I can’t imagine INEOS being desperate/daft enough to employ him.
As previously posted…. this time last season people were bigging up Kompany as the next City manager, can‘t hear anyone saying that now.He's a dark horse for sure.
I dont expect them too, but if they do appoint him then Ill assume that they have carefully selected him and have a vision for the club that he can assist with.
Imagine the interview. "We are interested in signing you, but we'll probably have to sack you in a couple of years."Any, I'll take any of them in the new structure model. The only thing about Tuchel is we'll probably have to sack him in a couple of years because he won't have the patience to see out a proper rebuild, or who knows? Maybe he's mellowed out after managing almost every big club in Europe and being sacked for fighting with the board over ambitions?
Then he'd leap up from his chair , says in a sharp and pointed manner " How dare you insult The Great Thomas Tuchel ! " then he'll fly off with those big dumbo ears of his , never to be seenImagine the interview. "We are interested in signing you, but we'll probably have to sack you in a couple of years."
A tiny part of me wouldn't mind a gamble on a manager like McKenna but I'm so tired of gambles that haven't paid off. Years of wasted time.
Would love to just have a proven world class manager with a top record
….and gone by Christmas, together with Utd’s hopes of top 4If McKenna gets appointed people will want him fired by October.
Not saying McKenna is a poor manager, just the difference between managing championship to prem being massive.
Kompany won the Championship last year with more points and more convincingly, being talked about as the next City manager. Look where Burnley are now.
This
I'm fine with it but some will say its a reason not to employ him. The reality is every manager should be sacked after 2-3 seasons if they're not delivering or causing issues.Imagine the interview. "We are interested in signing you, but we'll probably have to sack you in a couple of years."
I don't think McKenna is ready, but this applies to all United managers. The amount of stick TenHag gets compared to Poch for instance, and to a lesser extent Postecoglou, De Zerbi etc. is testimony to this.I just don't see how McKenna could be the answer. He would get destroyed by the media the second the form hits a rough patch. He looks like a very good coach, but the credit isn't in the bank yet to get through the inevitable rough spells that the club will be going through the next couple of years.
He would be much better served going to a Brighton or Wolves next.
He would get destroyed by the media the second the form hits a rough patch.
Not saying McKenna is a poor manager, just the difference between managing championship to prem being massive.
Kompany won the Championship last year with more points and more convincingly, being talked about as the next City manager. Look where Burnley are now.
If you haven't heard him speak, how can you say anything about his presence?I haven’t heard McKenna speak or have presence. Half of this managerial crap is presence, and we are crying out for that.
People underestimate as to how tough the PL is, which is multiplied when managing a club the size of United and all it’s expectations.Different leagues pose different challenges. There's no guarantees of success. Ten Hag was winning titles in Eredivisie and now he's on course to finish 8th, while shattering every negative record on the way, with Man Utd in the Prem. McKenna's success at lower levels doesn't guarantee him success in the Prem. But nor does Kompany's failure mean McKenna would fail too. they are different people.
But we have to have some measure. A newly promoted side to the EPL will be involved in a relegation battle 9/10 times, statistically. Kompany could have done better but let's be real. Keeping Burnley up, given their financial reach, would have been a small miracle. You're saying someone failed for not performing a small miracle. Meanwhile, we had the second largest net spend after Chelsea and we're about to finish 7th/8th in a historically bad season. That is a much bigger failure than Kompany's at Burnley. While managed by a 55yo proven manager with titles and CL runs under his belt.
People underestimate as to how tough the PL is, which is multiplied when managing a club the size of United and all it’s expectations.
Managers arguably better qualified than McKenna such as Gerrard and Lampard have quickly been found out in the PREM.
This would make sense to me, gives us a chance to see how McKenna fairs in the PL, and with Tuchel we know we have a top class manager who should have us setup and organised a lot better, we should be pushing for CL with his as manager.Tuchel for 2 years just to get us back into Champions leauge and McKenna there on after.