OmarUnited4ever
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2021
- Messages
- 4,184
Absolutely. I exercised caution throughout this summer as the caf descended into ‘well ETH won’t stand for this’ and ‘ETH won’t stand for that’. We have no idea what he will and won’t stand for, and he has to show me first before I blindly label him the messiah.
I have no time in this ‘so are you saying you know more than the manager’ shit anymore. YES. That is exactly what I am saying if his grand plan is to go through the season with this midfield. The PL is only getting better and better every year. More technical, more organised. Teams are passing triangles around us every week. I can see that this midfield will take us nowhere, and ANY manager who feels otherwise will no longer get any support from me. If Ten Hag thinks he can build a team with McFred as regular starters then feck him, he deserves the inevitable sack that will come and I will rejoice when it arrives so that, once again, I can hold some renewed hope that our manager does not feel that this midfield is in anyway acceptable.
As I have said, this is all an IF here, and we may yet change our midfield. But if we do not, then Ten Hag can feck off too as far as I am concerned. Any manager from now on that feels that Scott McTominay is hood enough to start weekly for us needs to go. Simple as that as far as I am concerned.
Can't disagree with you really on the bolded, even when I am someone who is very supportive of Ten Hag as the Head Coach, I can't really accept that he has to start McFred in PL games.
I hope he makes adjustments, and I'd rather see Eriksen play deeper, even though he isn't strong defensively and lacks the physicality to be a pure holding CM, the mere fact that Eriksen is a far far better ball player than McFred means that we would have a chance in a game where retaining possession, passing though lines and intelligent ball movement will give the team a chance to score goals and win games.