You are talking Jibberish ! He's the first name on the team sheet from this current shower of Sh** for me.
The reason we are losing games is because we are conceding easy goals and have no idea up front, other than individual brilliance from Ronaldo. Scott is not the problem !
Its easy to blame the midfield but for example we have Rashford who is massively overrated due to being English. He possibly would be driving a van for a career now, if it wasn't for the fact the Glazers started a season with only Rooney as their striker and LVG was forced to throw him into the 1st team. My neighbours son played in the same U18 league as Rashford but for City. He told me Rashford was nowhere near the best striker prospect in the U18 league, there were far better strikers in it and a lot quicker. Most of the other more talented prospects never got the chance and are now out of the game but Rashford is supposed to be some top United player.
If you dropped Scott into a holding midfield spot for City, Liverpool or Chelsea we would all be raving about him.
Log off Scott, you shouldn't be on the Caf.You are talking Jibberish ! He's the first name on the team sheet from this current shower of Sh** for me.
The reason we are losing games is because we are conceding easy goals and have no idea up front, other than individual brilliance from Ronaldo. Scott is not the problem !
Its easy to blame the midfield but for example we have Rashford who is massively overrated due to being English. He possibly would be driving a van for a career now, if it wasn't for the fact the Glazers started a season with only Rooney as their striker and LVG was forced to throw him into the 1st team. My neighbours son played in the same U18 league as Rashford but for City. He told me Rashford was nowhere near the best striker prospect in the U18 league, there were far better strikers in it and a lot quicker. Most of the other more talented prospects never got the chance and are now out of the game but Rashford is supposed to be some top United player.
If you dropped Scott into a holding midfield spot for City, Liverpool or Chelsea we would all be raving about him.
Log off Scott, you shouldn't be on the Caf.
Log off Scott, you shouldn't be on the Caf.
You're taking a simplistic view. Everyone is aware of the overall team's deficiencies, and I doubt anyone believes that without these 2, everything would be flawless. But it's quite easy to see that they are our biggest problem (on the field - most of our problems are actually off the field), our weakest area, and 2 of the poorest CMs, and by fair the poorest CM partnership, in the league. They're not the only issue - they are the most important one, and their area should be a building block and the engine for the rest of the team, but without that, we have absolutely 0 chance. Zero.It's incredible how much heat McFred are getting, as if we'd be a flawless team with Keane and Scholes in there.
There's many weaknesses elsewhere, but such is our need to scape goat.
That said, we need to have a rethink asap.
Though I suspect both will start 30 each still this season.
It's incredible how much heat McFred are getting, as if we'd be a flawless team with Keane and Scholes in there.
There's many weaknesses elsewhere, but such is our need to scape goat.
That said, we need to have a rethink asap.
Though I suspect both will start 30 each still this season.
It's a team game consisting of 11 players on the pitch at any one time. Obviously changing 2 of them won't improve the weaknesses of all 11, but when those two players are as weak as McFred it could certainly provide a significant upturn in performance in a key area of the pitch.It's incredible how much heat McFred are getting, as if we'd be a flawless team with Keane and Scholes in there.
There's many weaknesses elsewhere, but such is our need to scape goat.
That said, we need to have a rethink asap.
Though I suspect both will start 30 each still this season.
You're taking a simplistic view. Everyone is aware of the overall team's deficiencies, and I doubt anyone believes that without these 2, everything would be flawless. But it's quite easy to see that they are our biggest problem (on the field - most of our problems are actually off the field), our weakest area, and 2 of the poorest CMs, and by fair the poorest CM partnership, in the league. They're not the only issue - they are the most important one, and their area should be a building block and the engine for the rest of the team, but without that, we have absolutely 0 chance. Zero.
I disagree that they have a good mentality, especially McT. He seems very weak on the pitch, and goes hiding too often. Fred doesn't go hiding, that's fair, but he's too erratic and mistake prone to make up for that with his "mentality".Maybe I’m being simplistic too but if they are the most important cause they are the biggest weakness, who one the first day of the season, we are starting with them? Which manager is going to set a team up knowing that playing them in there is going to cost us the game.
It might be the weakest technically but I think the reason they are picked is their mentality and conversely, they are probably the strongest in that regard. I think Ole played them for that reason cause he knew they wouldn’t let him down and in fairness, rarely did. For me, it was the players with the higher technical ceilings that when it matter, didn’t show up.
How many of our big players turned up against the so called big teams but how many MoTM has Fred especially had in the big games?
I don’t think anybody is claiming that.
Our CM's can't pass the ball properly. I'm not sure what could be a more important factor in turning this team around. It's certainly not scapegoating.
I disagree that they have a good mentality, especially McT. He seems very weak on the pitch, and goes hiding too often. Fred doesn't go hiding, that's fair, but he's too erratic and mistake prone to make up for that with his "mentality".
As to why we're starting with them, it's a conjunction of elements: lack of good back ups in the squad, poor recruitment this summer, and probably Ten Hag's slight weakness to go with what's been tried and tested, without realising that in this system, up against a team that presses well, they'd be even poorer than they'd shown.
Also, apologies if the use of "simplistic" appeared condescending, I realise in hindsight that could have been the case, even though that wasn't the intention.
This is also because we played extremely conservative football in those games, relinquishing possession, not being on the front foot, and killing teams on the counter, bypassing the midfield. It's because we were not proactive in possession in those games that we had a few shock defeats (which were deserved, in most instances, but don't really reveal anything about McFred's abilities, or lack thereof, rather).I know it’s somewhat limited but I’d argue the biggest games of football we have won from Ole tenure, Scott, Fred and often both have been our midfield.
This is also because we played extremely conservative football in those games, relinquishing possession, not being on the front foot, and killing teams on the counter, bypassing the midfield. It's because we were not proactive in possession in those games that we had a few shock defeats (which were deserved, in most instances, but don't really reveal anything about McFred's abilities, or lack thereof, rather).
I strongly disagree on your general assessment, and I feel that you're really underestimating just how bad they are, but I think it's best we leave it at that!I didn’t offer a why, just offered that in my opinion that they were. You offered a style of football and why they havent got the ability to play it which I agree. For me it’s not that they aren’t good enough, it’s not good enough to play that way. People are offering the view that they are the worst midfield pairing in the league, like all the others can play the way you described too, which they can’t. In fact it’s arguable that only Liverpool and City consistently can.
The same football you described, 90% of the rest of the team couldn’t do either including DDG….
How do they compare stat wise to the other top 6 teams?
I strongly disagree on your general assessment, and I feel that you're really underestimating just how bad they are, but I think it's best we leave it at that!
Not sure. I'm guessing those stats have been produced over and over on the forum somewhere.
But I personally don't feel like I need stat comparisons. I've watched them for years and its not just a stat like pass completion that's the problem(although that is a big problem especially for McTominay).
It's weight and choice of pass, first touch, body shape etc. Intangibles.
…..without trying to be funny, what are fans seeing that managers aren’t. If it’s about choice, if Scott and Fred were injured, he have to have played others in there. If they are gonna cost us games, what’s there to lose?
Well I think the current manager does see the problem. Hence the FDJ chase and now Rabiot. Clearly he doesn't want both of them in the team.
Why Ole had so much belief in them who knows. He made a big mistake there and ultimately it cost him. We couldn't keep the ball in the opposition half under his management.
And I'm not one to go overboard about the two of them. They seem good lads, give it their all. In a different club with different expectations they might have more to offer.
They all failed and got sacked.Cool, just opinion and not trying to convince anyone to change their own. Its just funny how successive managers, very different in experience and profile sends 2 players out that fans believe will cost them to lose football matters. Not sure why the underestimate how bad they are too, which is kind of weird isn’t it. Like said, best we leave it at that….
Not sure if posted.
So your solution is to have passion merchant's with no technical ability. Certainly has worked so far.Maybe I’m being simplistic too but if they are the most important cause they are the biggest weakness, who one the first day of the season, we are starting with them? Which manager is going to set a team up knowing that playing them in there is going to cost us the game.
It might be the weakest technically but I think the reason they are picked is their mentality and conversely, they are probably the strongest in that regard. I think Ole played them for that reason cause he knew they wouldn’t let him down and in fairness, rarely did. For me, it was the players with the higher technical ceilings that when it matter, didn’t show up.
How many of our big players turned up against the so called big teams but how many MoTM has Fred especially had in the big games?
Statistically, Fred tends to compare well with other midfielders across most metrics. Scott on the other hand is very poor across most metrics. Comfortably in the bottom half of all midfielders throughout the top five leagues in Europe across most of them, let alone comparing him to the midfielders for the top 6 teams in the Premier League.How do they compare stat wise to the other top 6 teams?
You are talking Jibberish ! He's the first name on the team sheet from this current shower of Sh** for me.
The reason we are losing games is because we are conceding easy goals and have no idea up front, other than individual brilliance from Ronaldo. Scott is not the problem !
We have HUGE problems playing out from the back and Scott hides from the ball so there goes your theory down the drain.
Not sure if posted.
you are not wrong…….Kind of glad McTominay isn't on the field for this as no doubt he'd get the brunt of it. A different scapegoat will need to be found for today.
Have there been anyone worse than these two to have played 150+ games for us?