togg
Full Member
He wasn't totally bad...but one thing is for sure, he isn't the future......
Well, yeah, I agree that he's likely to leave in the summer, but whilst he's here, I try to be as objective as I can about him. That was my whole point. He wasn't as bad as people were making him out to be.I don't think he's good enough to be here, that's it really. As an Italian international, I imagine he himself, won't be too happy to be 3rd / 4th choice, so thankfully I can see him leaving this summer.
We weren't exactly creating a lot of chances in the first half. Up until the Rashford substitution, we were pretty average. It was a collective problem, not one that can be pointed at Darmian specifically.Even Valencia was pretty poor by your definition then.
Most sensible post hereI think we know what we get with Darmian and it's not bad. He's pretty reliable of not spectacular. I'm not sure that he'll be with us for the long-term but in the mean time, good to have available.
I actually don't remember Valencia's performance in the first half apart from his shot on goal. I do remember a couple of overlaps, but that's about it. We were generally very poor. Even Herrera and Pogba looked tired.We were ineffective at breaking down West Hams two banks of 4, that was at least in part due to us not stretching them on their right at all (Lingard was at fault for this too). Valencia wasn't brilliant but he was much better than Darmian. He got up often on the overlap drew their full back out to try to create space inside him. And he got a few decent crosses in as well as getting into the box a few times nearly scoring. He was always an option out there for a pass.
Can we say the same about Darmian? Not really i remember maybe one cross , one foray into the opposition box (think he was offside, which must be a rare experience for Matteo) and very little overlapping on the outside of Lingard. Mourinho seemed to agree he wasn't contributing enough as he hooked him and moved a centre back out there.
Do you think what he offered in attack tonight was enough for a Man Utd full back?
I think we know what we get with Darmian and it's not bad. He's pretty reliable of not spectacular. I'm not sure that he'll be with us for the long-term but in the mean time, good to have available.
If by reliable you mean incapable of getting through more than 3 90min performances a season without injury, booking, or having to be subbed to prevent getting sent off, then yes, very "reliable"
Darmian received the ball near the 18 yard line plenty of times. Often there was no movement ahead of him from Lingard or Mkhi to really capitalize on it. So he resorted to sideways passing. He was only hauled off coz West Ham were a man short. Else I don't think he would have been taken off.
Both Blind and Rojo seem to offer more than him as LB. And Valencia is never injured.hmm, he played well as defender, but as full back who has to attack too, he is really not good enough. if he's happy as squad player, I dont mind him to stay with us. back up for our LB/RB.
Darmian received the ball near the 18 yard line plenty of times. Often there was no movement ahead of him from Lingard or Mkhi to really capitalize on it. So he resorted to sideways passing. He was only hauled off coz West Ham were a man short. Else I don't think he would have been taken off.
And no, I don't think what he offered in attack was Utd caliber, but I didn't have the expectation that he would be a world beater when we had the ball. It was a typical Darmian performance.
TBF it is more like players have flopped for whatever reasons.Yeah shocking transfer window.
Even 2014 was a flop too. LVG failed in the transfer windows completely.
Agree. Keep saying similar for a while now in defense for Darmian. I see a trend in Mourinho trusts his positioning discipline in defense against teams with better crossing into our box while Blind is more trusted to play expansively vs teams we can pushed back and box themselves. I was definitely see Darmian being subbed today despite not worse defending 1 vs 1 than his previous game, seeing we like more attacking option vs 10 men West Ham playing deep.I think we know what we get with Darmian and it's not bad. He's pretty reliable of not spectacular. I'm not sure that he'll be with us for the long-term but in the mean time, good to have available.
He was subbed off because we were playing against 10 men. Nothing more to it than that.He was fine, the overreaction is bizarre. There's no inbetween I swear.
He's a squad player, when Shaw is back firing he'll be first choice LB.
CBJ would be a better option.
Surely.
He was subbed off because we were playing against 10 men. Nothing more to it than that.
He was subbed off because we were playing against 10 men. Nothing more to it than that.
No he doesn't make many runs outside of the winger, because he has a tendency to tuck in and move closer to the penalty box. He's not even a natural LB, it's very clear from the way he positions himself and shapes his body that he tends to move inward rather than outward. He made a couple of such runs, but was always tracked by someone.Thats being kind every time he gets the ball he can't wait to get rid of it. There was little movement in front of him partly because whoever plays on his side gets double teamed as Darmian barely makes runs on the outside. Yes them being down to 10 men contributed to him being taken off, but when one person had to come off Jose chose Darmian even though we didn't have another fullback on the bench. He could have easily taken off Rojo to move Carrick back. But he obviously preferred Rojo at LB to Darmian.
Again, the whole team was rather poor in the first half. Even the likes of Pogba, Herrera weren't exactly playing well. We were generally tired and it showed in the way we played. Focusing all that energy from our depressing first half (The golden chance aside) on one player is a bit much don't you think ?. He did his job defensively, and that's what I highlighted.Who is expecting a world beater attacking fullback though?
I'm certainly not and no ones expecting him to channel Roberto Carlos, i think the majority of people would just like a competent fullback who is able to contribute something, anything in attack. If he was an amazing defender i could almost overlook his attacking limitations. But he's not even that good in defence either, he's alright at times but teams often target him. If he's playing against a winger (on either side) with pace and/or strength he struggles, especially after 60-70 minutes as his stamina is awful.
No he doesn't make many runs outside of the winger, because he has a tendency to tuck in and move closer to the penalty box. He's not even a natural LB, it's very clear from the way he positions himself and shapes his body that he tends to move inward rather than outward. He made a couple of such runs, but was always tracked by someone.
Again, the whole team was rather poor in the first half. Even the likes of Pogba, Herrera weren't exactly playing well. We were generally tired and it showed in the way we played. Focusing all that energy from our depressing first half (The golden chance aside) on one player is a bit much don't you think ?. He did his job defensively, and that's what I highlighted.
He was actually good offensively at Torino as a Wing Back. I think he's a confidence player and his confidence must be pretty low for him to instinctively pass the ball to someone else. I'm not defending him, just an assumption.He's not a natural RB either because he plays almost exactly the same way on that side. He moves inward so he can lay the ball off to someone else and shuffle back to where he was.
I am not praising his performance. I said in an earlier post that he had a 6.5/10 rating from me, which is pretty much par. I didn't have much expectations from him attacking wise, so I was more or less satisfied with what he did defensively. He also won most of his one vs one's on his side, even if he did let Kouyate run free. Most of the hammers threat (If any) came either centrally or from Payet's side. Lanzini and Nordtveit were constantly in their own half marking Darmian and one of Mkhi/Lingard.No not at all because of several reasons this performance is what Darmian offers up on a regular basis. He didn't play 48 hours earlier and yet even against a team and in a side where most the players did play 48 hours earlier he still looked one of the worst and least energetic out there. He had almost nothing to do defensively either so why he is getting praised for that i don't know.
At one point the ball came over his head on his side of the pitch, you would expect a fullback to bust a gut to get to it and start us on a counter attack. But no he calmly jogged over to it, Kouyate did bust a gut ran past him gathered the ball and could have caused us problems. And that sums Darmian for me he's a frustrating player to watch.
He was actually good offensively at Torino as a Wing Back. I think he's a confidence player and his confidence must be pretty low for him to instinctively pass the ball to someone else. I'm not defending him, just an assumption.
I am not praising his performance. I said in an earlier post that he had a 6.5/10 rating from me, which is pretty much par. I didn't have much expectations from him attacking wise, so I was more or less satisfied with what he did defensively. He also won most of his one vs one's on his side, even if he did let Kouyate run free. Most of the hammers threat (If any) came either centrally or from Payet's side. Lanzini and Nordtveit were constantly in their own half marking Darmian and one of Mkhi/Lingard.
He can be a frustrating player to watch and I don't disagree, but my expectations from him were far lower than what you expected, hence I can call his performance as "Acceptable".
Really? I noticed him camped on the side of their box and Pogba/Ibra trying to get something going with him...I thought he was fine but he wasn't getting forward enough considering we were playing vs 10 men
I can't remember him getting forward much or maybe it's the fact he's just not very good in attack.Really? I noticed him camped on the side of their box and Pogba/Ibra trying to get something going with him...
It seemed obvious to me we needed to get Martial/Rashford on. Not that he was bad, just useless in the final third.
Call me crazy but he was ok. Nothing to be crazy about.
Yesterday was the final call for me on him when he was caught up by defenders despite being offside when starting his run.
He is our 3rd choice or 4th Choice Left Back. Considering that, I thought he put in a decent shift. Hence, me labelling his performance as "Acceptable". As for worst ever full back we signed, it's tough to say. Buttner was pretty poor too tactically (Although he did play well against Bayern). Then there's Blackett who was calamitous.Thats the thing mate i expected about as much from Darmian as you did, i have very low expectations of him in general. But the difference being i just don't find his level of performance acceptable not just for a Man Utd full back but for any full back at the top level.
In almost 30 years of watching football, for my money he is the worst fullback we've had in that period. And the mad thing is i think bar Shaw he is the most expensive fullback we've ever signed.