Tony247
Full Member
- Joined
- May 2, 2018
- Messages
- 10,165
That's not a position in football, nor a primary skill. No football club goes in the market seeking only for "a player who can press".Pressing wise, he is absolutely a key player.
That's not a position in football, nor a primary skill. No football club goes in the market seeking only for "a player who can press".Pressing wise, he is absolutely a key player.
Neither is he "a player who can press" only. No one said that, except people with weird agenda against him. But we look tons better in press with him in the team, that is as obvious as can be.That's not a position in football, nor a primary skill. No football club goes in the market seeking only for "a player who can press".
The worst part is we didn’t even need him and had no idea how to play him even when he was fit.We signed a crock, unfortunately. Chelsea did us dirty.
So why was Arteta and Klopp both after him? Because according to some on here, that is his only skill.That's not a position in football, nor a primary skill. No football club goes in the market seeking only for "a player who can press".
He was missed. We didn't press as well without him.Crazy that peeps are saying Mount will be 'missed' in the match day thread. Since when did he become a key player, he's barely featured.
So why was Arteta and Klopp both after him? Because according to some on here, that is his only skill.
I don't know why you're talking about City, unless you thought Klopp managed City.That is not 100% or a given, unless they both admitted it they were after him.
Even if they were, they signed plenty of duds. City were after Maguire, Alexis and Fred as well apparently. Mount would have been a squad player at City and Arsenal as well, so nothing changed
I don't know why you're talking about City, unless you thought Klopp managed City.
Hope you enjoyed our 0-3 loss without anyone actually doing any pressing and allowed Liverpool to do what they want. You got it your way.
He wasn't. In his first three and a half seasons at Chelsea he didn't miss many games at all. Other than Bruno, I doubt there were any players in our squad who were available as much as Mount was.Never realised he was this injury prone though
He wasn't. In his first three and a half seasons at Chelsea he didn't miss many games at all. Other than Bruno, I doubt there were any players in our squad who were available as much as Mount was.
It was just his last half a season at Chelsea where he struggled with the pelvic injury which he eventually had to have surgery on.
As long as he got over that one injury properly, there was no reason to think he'd be injury prone for us. Indeed the club were probably expecting he'd be one of our most reliable players fitness-wise.
This transfer looks like really bad luck (assuming we get over the fact he wasn't the type of player we should be going for in the first place).He wasn't. In his first three and a half seasons at Chelsea he didn't miss many games at all. Other than Bruno, I doubt there were any players in our squad who were available as much as Mount was.
It was just his last half a season at Chelsea where he struggled with the pelvic injury which he eventually had to have surgery on.
As long as he got over that one injury properly, there was no reason to think he'd be injury prone for us. Indeed the club were probably expecting he'd be one of our most reliable players fitness-wise.
Okay and who buys him on his wages with his injury record?Get rid. If you can’t stay fit you should not be at the club. Everyone gets injured but not constantly.
I just see mount as a grafter but not a stand out player.
Exactly. I keep seeing posters saying get rid of Mount/Casemiro/Rashford/Antony. But to who exactly? Which club in their right mind is going to pay a transfer fee and pick up their ridiculous wages? We are stuck with them unless we take a financial hit and give them free transfers.Okay and who buys him on his wages with his injury record?
Only thing we can do is manage his playing time wisely. That’s it.
This transfer looks like really bad luck (assuming we get over the fact he wasn't the type of player we should be going for in the first place).
If we list our worst transfers of late - Sancho, Antony, and possibly Mount then there's a different reason behind each of those.
Okay and who buys him on his wages with his injury record?
Only thing we can do is manage his playing time wisely. That’s it.
My biggest frustration with the Antony and Mount deals ( transfer and wages) is that I really can’t get my head around how it ended there. Who else wanted them at anywhere near that price and how did Antony’s team managed to negotiate a salary that must be at least 3 times his wages at Ajax.1. Sancho - wrong attitude / position
2. Antony - overpaid by 300-400%
3. Mount - wrong position + overpaid + injury prone
Frustratingly the whole Sancho and Antony mess stemmed from the Greenwood mess. If only that didn’t happen, we’d potentially be in a much better place squad wise. Mount is just as frustrating as he really was not the player we should have been going for, and for £55m when he only had 12 months on his contract, helping out Chelsea to skirt round their ludicrous spending, only for him to barely kick a ball last year. The last of the Glazer transfer fumbles.
My biggest frustration with the Antony and Mount deals ( transfer and wages) is that I really can’t get my head around how it ended there. Who else wanted them at anywhere near that price and how did Antony’s team managed to negotiate a salary that must be at least 3 times his wages at Ajax.
1. Sancho - wrong attitude / position
2. Antony - overpaid by 300-400%
3. Mount - wrong position + overpaid + injury prone
Frustratingly the whole Sancho and Antony mess stemmed from the Greenwood mess. If only that didn’t happen, we’d potentially be in a much better place squad wise. Mount is just as frustrating as he really was not the player we should have been going for, and for £55m when he only had 12 months on his contract, helping out Chelsea to skirt round their ludicrous spending, only for him to barely kick a ball last year. The last of the Glazer transfer fumbles.
1. Sancho - wrong attitude / position
2. Antony - overpaid by 300-400%
3. Mount - wrong position + overpaid + injury prone
Frustratingly the whole Sancho and Antony mess stemmed from the Greenwood mess. If only that didn’t happen, we’d potentially be in a much better place squad wise. Mount is just as frustrating as he really was not the player we should have been going for, and for £55m when he only had 12 months on his contract, helping out Chelsea to skirt round their ludicrous spending, only for him to barely kick a ball last year. The last of the Glazer transfer fumbles.
My biggest frustration with the Antony and Mount deals ( transfer and wages) is that I really can’t get my head around how it ended there. Who else wanted them at anywhere near that price and how did Antony’s team managed to negotiate a salary that must be at least 3 times his wages at Ajax.
The club would have sold rashford this summer if someone comes in with a 60mil offer imo.Exactly. I keep seeing posters saying get rid of Mount/Casemiro/Rashford/Antony. But to who exactly? Which club in their right mind is going to pay a transfer fee and pick up their ridiculous wages? We are stuck with them unless we take a financial hit and give them free transfers.
I just hope we haven’t made the same mistake with Bruno and that unnecessary huge new contract.
Expect endless eloquent exclamations ever expertly elevating Eberechi Eze, eh? Eeedjit …So wish we signed Eze instead of Mount. Would have cost roughly the same.
Come again?Expect endless eloquent exclamations ever expertly elevating Eberechi Eze, eh? Eeedjit …
Alliteration like the thread title.Come again?
Apparently, back in training
Argh ok.Alliteration like the thread title.