crossy1686
career ending
I don’t know, it’s not my job to scout football players all year round but teams like Brighton, Brentford and Villa manage it quite easy enough.Who are these players? How much are they going to cost?
I don’t know, it’s not my job to scout football players all year round but teams like Brighton, Brentford and Villa manage it quite easy enough.Who are these players? How much are they going to cost?
This is most definitely up for debatefootball
That's exactly the problem I described? We're trying to turn a decent attacking player into an elite level deep lying midfielder to replace Eriksen, which I don't think he is and I don't see him becoming.
At some point next season we'll realise Mount is not the answer as Casemiro's midfield partner and we'll be asking for another midfield signing. At this point we'll start to see him as an alternative Bruno when he doesn't play, which is the role VDB currently occupies (poorly, I might add). Mount will do a much better job at providing cover for Bruno than anyone else, but I don't see him as the answer to replace Eriksen's current role in the team.
I don’t know, it’s not my job to scout football players all year round but teams like Brighton, Brentford and Villa manage it quite easy enough.
Very true.I don’t know, it’s not my job to scout football players all year round but teams like Brighton, Brentford and Villa manage it quite easy enough.
For the last 10 years, every end of season/pre-season there are numerous posts like this suggesting we should play a diamond system. Never happens. Probably ever will for the foreseeable future.
It still is a crazy amount of money for a player with a year left on contract coming out of a bad season.Not anymore it's not, personally I don't think Mount is right for us but that doesn't make him a bad player, as a cog in the right structure he's probably very good, it could be that ETH is looking at him in conjunction with another addition to he team, one thing I do know though, ETH knows a heck of a lot more about managing a football team than any of us do!
I doubt it, multiple caps, CL winner, Euro finalist, regular top premiership player. The lad can clearly play football. To say he is a nothing player and ask if what if anything he's good at is a bit silly.This is most definitely up for debate
I believe we would target another midfielder as well and Mount would most probably compete with Fernandes in the long run .We need a more equipped midfielder. I've been one of the vocal people about us needing 2 midfielders for us to really compete. Mount wouldn't be solving a big issue which we have. The issues of recycling the football and physicality in the middle part of the field is our biggest issues. If we can get our wildest wishes, a 60%, not even 100%, of Scholes and Keane would be the perfect summer recruitment.
Sadly Mount is non of those. We need midfield style elevation urgently. We need to control games and compete physically to League demands.
Wow, so many cry babies on here, you have no idea how the manager wants to play or who suits his vision for next season.
Mount is definitely better then McTominay, DVB and Fred, its a squad game ans our squad needs improvement.
Happens all the time. You'd have thought getting Weghorst in on loan was a great bit of a business if you read some the comments in his transfer thread.Wonder how many of those suddenly proclaiming the value of Mount have been consistently doing so in the past. I'd bet very few, always the same when we're linked with someone.
Well that is sort of true but could they get the players who would stand out and make a difference at Utd? Occasionally they might but it’s not really the same for those clubs.I don’t know, it’s not my job to scout football players all year round but teams like Brighton, Brentford and Villa manage it quite easy enough.
To you, maybe. To most folk he's the player who won Chelsea's Player of the Season in their CL winning year, and last year when they came third and made it to two cup finals. Hardly a "nothing player" just because you don't see his quality.This is most definitely up for debate
Do we think this is a moneyball type signing in that he’s bringing things which might not be apparent?
At what cost to compete with Bruno?I believe we would target another midfielder as well and Mount would most probably compete with Fernandes in the long run .
Have we even been linked with caicedo? I’ve only seen arsenal and Liverpool linked with him.I'm not against the idea of Mount, but I think he'd be brought in as cover in a few positions.
Right now, we don't really have a backup for Bruno, and he can play there. Right now we don't really have a backup for Eriksen, and he can play there.
I actually think it would be a shrewd signing, but not for the 50-60mil being thrown about.
If we moved on VdB, McTominay and Fred, while bringing in Mount and Caicedo for example, I think we have a good midfield, with good rotational options in all three positions.
Bruno - Mount
Caicedo - Mount - Eriksen
Casemiro - Caicedo
That is a huge improvement on what we have now
And yet no one has yet been able to describe with any authority what he's actually good at. Instead people keep listing his CL win like Ross Turnbull hasn't also got a Champions League medal.I doubt it, multiple caps, CL winner, Euro finalist, regular top premiership player. The lad can clearly play football. To say he is a nothing player and ask if what if anything he's good at is a bit silly.
He may not be the most exciting signing in your mind, but he'd be an excellent addition to any team that wants to to dominate possession which is how EtH says he likes to play, this season he's been pragmatic working with what he has, next I imagine he wants to play more in his preferred style and Mount obviously fits that well.
At what cost to compete with Bruno?
I've been advocate of binning Bruno off, so as the team can play with a flat 3 midfielders. But if we are trying to bring Mount as Bruno competition, we will not be solving anything.
Already teams have gone to fullbacks tucking in giving a 3-2 setup when starting attacks. Us we are still in a 4231 setup. We are not even on 433, we don't have competent midfielders yet.
Even yesterday you saw how Fulham was opening us wide open. That should be the first point to address.
We can't afford a Mount now. We need 2 Casemiro quality and effect midfielders, if not possible. 1 midfielder who has genuine quality, improves the Midfield immediately, takes his position immediately, his effect on the team is felt immediately Casemiro style.
We have too many passengers in the team, we need other quality players to help carry the load of the team.
Mount can be perfect for Pep as Gündoğan replacement. He will be going to an already established midfield in City. But for us we have major issues in our midfield to carry another non elite footballer.
Wonder how many of those suddenly proclaiming the value of Mount have been consistently doing so in the past. I'd bet very few, always the same when we're linked with someone.
He's a half decent player and I'll trust ETH has a specific plan but can't say I see it. Seems unwise in terms of resource and priorities.
I'm sure they could in reality. We used to do it regularly under Fergie, albeit they might need some settling in time of up to a season but that's pretty much what Malacia has had to do this year.Well that is sort of true but could they get the players who would stand out and make a difference at Utd? Occasionally they might but it’s not really the same for those clubs.
I've seen us linked but I can't remember where, probably someone on Twitter with questionable authority. It would make perfect sense for our lot to think he's good value at £70m when we missed out at £15m a few seasons ago.Have we even been linked with caicedo? I’ve only seen arsenal and Liverpool linked with him.
Of course they exist, where do you think we're getting these players from? Are we growing them under OT? Where are Brighton and Brentford getting them from?So basically you don't know, you just assume they exist out there somewhere?
Even if they did, coming in to Brighton, Brentford or Villa is a much different prospect and pressure level than signing for Man Utd. For all the plaudits those teams get, if one of their players makes a mistake or has a bad game it's not plastered all over every aspect of sports media for the next week. You also never hear about the guys that do fail and get shipped off back to Belgium come the season's end. Where as we'll never fecking hear the end of Bebe or Djemba-Djemba!
Those teams also specifically sign systems players, which is why they manage to slot in so well. We don't have that system yet, but the manager is trying to get there. Who thought Martinez would work out as well as he did?
Have a bit of faith.
That doesn't say much really does it? I'm pretty sure he only got that because he scored in the final.To you, maybe. To most folk he's the player who won Chelsea's Player of the Season in their CL winning year, and last year when they came third and made it to two cup finals. Hardly a "nothing player" just because you don't see his quality.
I don't really care about the money, if it's the right player for the team and helps us be successful then the money doesn't really matterIt still is a crazy amount of money for a player with a year left on contract coming out of a bad season.
Typical that though. But then again we paid 90m for pogba after letting him go on a free, twice may I add with no money backI've seen us linked but I can't remember where, probably someone on Twitter with questionable authority. It would make perfect sense for our lot to think he's good value at £70m when we missed out at £15m a few seasons ago.
For both seasons? Well as long as you're pretty sure about it...That doesn't say much really does it? I'm pretty sure he only got that because he scored in the final.
We’ll just have to wait and see until the end of the window. Hopefully we have the cash to buy Kane, one of Rice or Caicedo, a new GK and RB as well.I don't really care about the money, if it's the right player for the team and helps us be successful then the money doesn't really matter
was it? Could have sworn I've seen him score in a final, but then again, Havertz is equally shit so I could have confused the two of them.For both seasons? Well as long as you're pretty sure about it...
I mean, Havertz is the guy who got the goal in the final but let's not worry about that. I'm sure everything else you've said can be taken as gospel.
Lots of cocaineIs there leverage Chelsea have here that I’m not aware of to be demanding that high a price?
The expectations of Brighton/Brentford and their owners/fans aren't the same, these teams can afford the risk, if it doesn't work out they lose little, they may end up1 2th instead of 8th, if United finish 6th instead of 4th there's merry hell to payOf course they exist, where do you think we're getting these players from? Are we growing them under OT? Where are Brighton and Brentford getting them from?
We try buy them once they've already proven they can play in the PL, at which point they cost north of £60m so we can only buy one and then chase 4 players on free transfers. Just because you and I don't know who they are right, if it doesn't work out they've lost li now doesn't mean they aren't out there.
aw man is there any player that you like?was it? Could have sworn I've seen him score in a final, but then again, Havertz is equally shit so I could have confused the two of them.
4-2-3-1 is just a line up on paper just like Arsenal's on paper or City's whatever variant of 4-1-4-1 they put on paper.
Our FBs tuck in too, to support midfield. More often that not, it's Shaw, Malacia and at times Dalot.
We don't need a new RB, AWB is just fine, just 1 season under ETH has transformed him, another season and who knows what he can be, a GK can wait, we need another MF and probably another ST firstWe’ll just have to wait and see until the end of the window. Hopefully we have the cash to buy Kane, one of Rice or Caicedo, a new GK and RB as well.