Red00012
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2018
- Messages
- 13,820
Anything over £20 million they can keep him
From Chelsea fans:
Runs around a lot, high amount of final third presses albeit with a low success rate but he's another slow, weak player to add to our collection.
Standard Mason Mount performance:
Oh my God. Comparing Mount, who can't even get into the worst Chelsea side in 25 years, with arguably the greatest midfielder of the past 25 years just because he runs around like crazy is a joke of the highest order.Friend of a mine who's a football analyst for various clubs and a journalist told me a year ago Mount is as close as England has to Modrić in the sense of the way he plays. We were talking about how England doesn't produce those kind of players, technically sound players with a good passing and defensive skill too, but is more about pace and wingers, for various reasons, and mentioned Mount.
We're going in circles as I don't think you understand my argument or I'm not explaining myself well enough.
The position we tend to see assumes there isn't a player with the profile we're looking for because people can't name them. You can see there are players out there who perform in the metrics for what we're looking for. I don't have a preference of who, it's all about profile in terms of what they bring to the group.
Back to Mount - he is the right profile of player, but he clearly is extremely expensive, especially as he doesn't really excel in the areas we're crying out for.
Meanwhile nothing but top clubs are seemingly after Mount?Oh my God. Comparing Mount, who can't even get into the worst Chelsea side in 25 years, with arguably the greatest midfielder of the past 25 years just because he runs around like crazy is a joke of the highest order.
I found this on google and made by arsenal fan. Gundogan has 88% passing accuracy while Mount 21/22 had 85% passing accuracy with more progressive passes.
This was posted last year in April. I reckon, if this is still 2022, people wouldn’t have any issue about us signing Mount.
This was posted last year in April. I reckon, if this is still 2022, people wouldn’t have any issue about us signing Mount.
I think Mount is a pretty good player when put into the right role. But this is a good example of stats being misleading without context.
Mount 21-22 was played as an attacking/midfielder in a 3-4-2-1, his job was to be one of the top corners in a midfield box, first wave of the press, stay relatively high when building up, only minimal responsibilities in settled defensive shape. In total over the course of the season he had 1564 touches, of which 928 (59%) came in the attacking third.
Gundogan 22-23 can sometimes move into the top left of midfield box in settled possession, but is a crucial player in buildup, dropping deep next to Rodri (and occasionally actually deputizing for Rodri), and then in settled defense is a critical cog playing next to Rodri once Stones (or whoever else is playing that role) backs out of midfield and into the four man back line. Almost the exact same amount of minutes as Mount, but 1806 touches, of which only 596 (33%) came in the attacking third.
Basically, Mount isn't producing any more offensive output than Gundogan despite having far fewer responsibilities in buildup, settled defense, or stopping transitions and despite having a much higher number of touches and much higher percentage of touches in the attacking third. Final third contribution is like a side gig for Gundogan, yet he's doing it just as well as Mount while still shouldering all the main midfield responsibilities. Of course Gundogan is part of a very well oiled City machine. But Mount's Chelsea was a pretty good team as well.
He played near the goal that season. He will not be doing this with us, therefor he is not going to show stats for his overall play that is painfully average. Stats is not everything.
I guess they do not want to play a guy that does not want to sign a new contract, and its one foot out the door, if we trust the rumors. I'd take him as a squad player for no more than 25m, he can be a good option to haveIs he injured? Why isn’t he in their squad?
Is he injured? Why isn’t he in their squad?
Looks like a JLingz specialFrom Chelsea fans:
Runs around a lot, high amount of final third presses albeit with a low success rate but he's another slow, weak player to add to our collection.
Standard Mason Mount performance:
Mount is Chelsea's main set piece taker yet he only managed 1 season where he had more than 10 assists in all comps.Stats is not everything. The only reason why I posted the goals and assists isn’t to show everything about Mason Mount but it’s to show Mason Mount has the talent to offer good amount of end product. That’s something what he can offer and I’ll be very surprised if we don’t play in his strength but playing him deep.
Mount is Chelsea's main set piece taker yet he only managed 1 season where he had more than 10 assists in all comps.
2019-20 6 assists in 53 games
2020-21 9 assists in 54 games
2022-21 16 assists in 53 games most of them coming from set pieces
2022-23 6 assists in 35 games
So there was a theory bandied around, mostly by that Muppetiers account I think, that ETH has kind of switched his setup in the sense of how he wants us to play, which kind of makes sense when you see the difference between this summer and last summer and the kind of midfielders we're reportedly targetting
So before we basically wanted De Jong, this was even before Casemiro, akin to the original setup he had at Ajax, but now he's switching it more to his second Ajax setup, which is essentially one 6 and two 8's, which makes sense when you can see the type of midfielder we seemingly are after are the Mount's and Mac Allister types.
Ten Hag likes dropping Bruno deeper and out wide, instead of signing an 8 to replace Eriksen it opens up Mount for 10 who will add legs and work rate that would help us stop every top 8 side walking through us away from home. We might miss a bit of creativity through Mount but that would be negated by the world class 9/10 hybrid play signing Kane would bring so I’m guessing it’s a big picture signing.
@Bastian I wasn't going to respond but as you've asked, then signing him makes sense imo.
The likes of Bruno and Fred etc play with a lot of energy but they're easily bypassed by quick and agile players. Mount not only matches the aforementioned two for intensity but is also physically and athletically gifted hence he's stronger in defensive transition and tactically he's a superior player for a team that wants to sacrifice defensive stability for goals. It's why the likes of Liverpool and Arsenal want him, aswell as Tuchel rating him highly. All our forwards with the exception of Antony aren't very intelligent when it comes to defensive duties in defensive transition. And previously the likes of Pogba and Matic were also easily bypassed in midfield. So you can't control games without controlling both what you do in possession and also what you do out of possession. And what you do out of possession isn't very popular amongst some fans but it's absolutely imperative if one wants to implement a proactive attacking brand of football by playing the game in the opponent's half.
Also if we end up signing Harry Kane with him dropping deeper with Mount behind him, it makes more sense for a player with Mounts skillset to be behind him centrally, rather than Bruno imo. Mount is a proper systems player and hence a positional play coach like Tuchel was able to get his ideas across quickly to the player. Mount can also be used as a pressing trigger and is technically good, aswell as tactically clever.
And I hope we can get the deals done quickly because for me the most important positions to target to dominate games is a keeper, CM and RB. And those three positions are key to exerting control in possession and play through the press and raise the defensive line.
May be that’s down to some players had poor finishing ability because based on his xA, he should have gotten much more.Mount is Chelsea's main set piece taker yet he only managed 1 season where he had more than 10 assists in all comps.
2019-20 6 assists in 53 games
2020-21 9 assists in 54 games
2022-21 16 assists in 53 games most of them coming from set pieces
2022-23 6 assists in 35 games
I really don't get the disdain for him at all.
Compared to the general standard of attacking midfielders across the league, he's above average in pretty much every aspect of on the ball play. Touch, passing, shooting, carrying, etc. The base level of technicality in our squad goes up if he's added.
And off the ball, he's a pressing machine. All that combined makes for a very good player for a side who want to play technical, pressing football. Certainly a stylistic fit for the team if not a positional one.
I can understand people thinking he isn't a particularly good fit position-wise (I don't either), or that he doesn't impose himself on games enough, or having concerns that he isn't creative enough if we actually played him instead of Bruno. But some of the posts make him sound far less than the at worst perfectly fine, technically sound, hard-working player he is.
Someone above saying he fails the eye test whenever you look at him, when in reality he's generally looked like the highly competent player the statistics suggest he is when I've watched Chelsea. I can only think his England performances have addled people's perception of his somewhat, because based on the previous three seasons of his actual performances for his club he's obviously a fine player at our level and someone other top English clubs would inevitably look to sign.
If we sign Mason Mount, I believe there will be changing of tactic next season. And this is mainly because ten Hag and the scouting teams couldn’t find a deep-playmaker that has similar profile as FDJ (Someone with press resistance who can be ball carrier and progressive passer). Instead of playing with 4231, he will play 433. We see this changing formation in his Ajax team when FDJ left.
The following below is Ajax attacking transition vs Dortmund in 2021/2022 season. You can see that Gravenberch is nowhere near in Ajax build up play phase. It‘s the keeper, two CB, a DM, and the two full backs the ones who got involved in this. Among these 6 players, Alvarez is the one being assigned to play more simple passes and doesn’t get involved on the ball often (see below stats), this suitable to Casemiro who is not a press resistance so I think we will see a different role in Casemiro next season in comparison to this season.
I think our build up and attacking transition will be something like this:
GKBruno will play in Gravenberch position while Mount will play next to him. Our full backs will cover the half space and sometime swap position with the wingers.
Varane Martinez
Casemiro
RB —————— Shaw
Antony - Mount - Bruno - Rashford
ST
Mount will be perfect to play in this set up and system because we will get to utilise his strength to do high press, scoring goals and assists.
I took pictures of these FBref end of last season so this is based on 21/22 season.
Someone convince me where he fits into team
Is there a bigger example than Mount of a player so many fans seem to think is shite but coaches and managers really rate?
Don't think Ten Hag rates him that highly or we wouldn't be interested in RiceScott McTominay
Scott McTominay
He doesn't get picked unless there's injuries/suspensions, does he?
That was obviously to ease Casemiro in, rather than because he thought McT was better.In fact, ETH chose McTominay and kept Casemiro out of the initial games till that wretched City game when it became apparent.