Jacob
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2005
- Messages
- 25,800
Did Chelsea ask to put out Bayern rumours to counterattack or Caicedo smoke screen?
Mount for 70m this year or free next year? It's a no brainer isn't it? If clubs like Juventus and Barca are happy to wait for freebies, we can wait too.
There are other positions that need sorting out more urgently.
A DOF buying players regardless of whether a manager wants them or not is fecking ridiculous
Did Chelsea ask to put out Bayern rumours to counterattack or Caicedo smoke screen?
The DOF should select the players (in and out) and the manager should work with the squad he’s given.
The DOF should be there for years but managers come and go.
At least that’s what I thought a DOF did.
Manchester united really are run a bunch of fecking idiots
1. These empty threats
>oh this is our last and final bid
>oh we're gonna walk away
>oh we're gonna sign this other player and that other player
When everybody and his dogs know we are full of shite. It's an embarrassment to the club and more damaging to our image than bidding 5 or 10 million more.
2. People thinking there's a "manchester united tax" and it somehow being unfair that let's say manchester city doesn't get the same treatment
No fecking shit. Manchester city already has the best and most functioning team in the country. If daniel levy try to feck them over this year, they can say feck you we'll buy halland next year, and they know no other team can compete with them for his signature. Meanwhile they will still win the fecking league even without a striker.
Manchester united havent won shit for 10 years (don't tell me about micky mouse cups and piggy pig league). We should expect to overpay if we want to get to the top. You think man city didnt get bend over by every team, player, and agent 15 years ago? Did real madrid haggle over a couple of quid 15 years ago when barcelona was the best team in the world or did they break every spending record there is trying to catch up?
3. Haggling over 5 and 10 millions
You people talk shit about daniel levy putting money over trophies and want him to bend over so we can sign his player for cheap. Meanwhile you want the club to walk away when the difference is 5-10 million. 5 -10 million is nothing if its the difference between winning and not winning the league.
Oh? What? Mason mount isnt going to be the difference between winning and not winning the league? Neither will caicedo and he'll cost 40 million more.
Pay the fecking money and get it over with so we can start pre season on a high.
I reckon after pep leaves city though they’re gonna go for a similar type of manager, otherwise their talented squad is wasted. If you’re gonna go from an attack minded manager to a more defensive one then its a waste of the players talents. There are managers that have certain styles but may tweak a few things. Like the Brighton manager could probably do a job at Liverpool and city with his style and their players. A lot of managers buy players to fit their philosophy, they may improve a few players but they rarely improve players to play the way they want. When pep took over city he bought dozens of FBs and a completely new defence to play the way he wanted. He didn’t improve anyone to play the way he wanted.There's not a vast pool of top managers available for such a system to function. Recruiting a series of "similar minded" managers doesn't happen in any club. Once one manager is fired, there are barely two or three good managers obtainable in the market.
There are some managers hell bent on a certain philosophy of football. These are the non-adaptive, rigid types. But in general, good managers should be able to adapt to the types of players at his disposal and then gradually help the team evolve to reflect his philosophy of playing. This may take a couple of seasons.
What philosophy did City have prior to Pep? Or Liverpool before Klopp? Or for that matter even Chelsea before Tuchel? They were chopping and changing personnel.
By the end of this upcoming season, we should see a significant improvement in the way United play. If not, either the club management isn't helping the manager get "his" players, or Ten Hag isn't good enough.
A DOF is never there for years. It’s over blown nonsense, DOF themselves have a high turnover at most clubs.The DOF should select the players (in and out) and the manager should work with the squad he’s given.
The DOF should be there for years but managers come and go.
At least that’s what I thought a DOF did.
The outrage on here based on hypotheticals is hilarious at times. I mean from what we’ve read, United said they’d walk away and by all accounts have done, but some people are going mad that they might put in another bid.
Although I agree with you, there's no guarantee he will pick us when he's free. Interest in him will be more intense.
Mount wanted to be amongst the top tier in pay at Chelsea. I don’t see Bayern offering Mount 250k without irking few other players.Not at all. Bayern pay huge wages. They've got quite a few players on more than 15 mil a year (and some on 20 mil).
If Chelsea didn't offer 250K and Man United don't agree a fee, Bayern wouldn't need to offer 250K.Mount wanted to be amongst the top tier in pay at Chelsea. I don’t see Bayern offering Mount 250k without irking few other players.
He won’t move anyway. Part of the brief over the last week is Mount wanting United now and when he’s on a freeMount wanted to be amongst the top tier in pay at Chelsea. I don’t see Bayern offering Mount 250k without irking few other players.
Bayerns interest is not an indication of a players interest.Wait a second. He wanted to go United , and only to United
That’s literally how a DOF works.A DOF buying players regardless of whether a manager wants them or not is fecking ridiculous
It's all well and good "sticking to our guns" but we've been here before with the board not backing the manager. I'm not a huge Mason Mount fan but clearly ETH is and once again we'll have got to the start of the season without player(s) the boss wants, having wasted weeks. I really hope the new owners wipes this bunch of dicks in the boardroom away
Although I agree with you, there's no guarantee he will pick us when he's free. Interest in him will be more intense.
I reckon after pep leaves city though they’re gonna go for a similar type of manager, otherwise their talented squad is wasted. If you’re gonna go from an attack minded manager to a more defensive one then its a waste of the players talents. There are managers that have certain styles but may tweak a few things. Like the Brighton manager could probably do a job at Liverpool and city with his style and their players. A lot of managers buy players to fit their philosophy, they may improve a few players but they rarely improve players to play the way they want. When pep took over city he bought dozens of FBs and a completely new defence to play the way he wanted. He didn’t improve anyone to play the way he wanted.
Yeh... weeks... that's what they said last year about FdJ.There's a limit to how much they can back him. Chelsea are being ridiculous in their demands so I'm quite pleased that they're sticking to their guns.
Also, weeks? Calm down a bit would you.
when chelsea come calling for
Yeh... weeks... that's what they said last year about FdJ.
As I said, I'm no great fan of Mount, but this is the transfer ETH is clearly focusing on. He obviously wants him and has a particular vision for him so we should go all out to get him. Once again, other clubs breeze through their transfers, even bloody Arsenal. Us? not so, much. Someone tell me how Arsenal can buy Havertz and remain clearly in pole position to spend £100m on Rice, while we can't...
Umm they really aren't. Last year Casemiro, Martinez, Eriksen and Malacia weren't laboured. Antony was the only one you could label as a laboured saga. FDJ was another one.I can't believe that Mount is ten Hag's one and ONLY target this year. Just concentrate on his other targets for now and if we have 70 million spare at the end of summer, we do this.
Why are transfers always so laboured with this club?
It's mental isn't it?
United say they that the next bid is the last one and they'll walk away if it's rejected.
United bid.
Chelsea reject it demand more.
United walk away but leave the door open because they like the player and the player wants to join.
Caf: "EmBaRrAsSiNg!!"
Bayerns interest is not an indication of a players interest.
That’s literally how a DOF works.
You have a style of play, you bring in a manager/head coach who plays that way, the DOF gets players that suit that style of play. Manager says I need a striker. DOF gets a striker.
That’s how the DOF works. A manager has very little say if any say at all in transfers.
Of course it’s different at every club and slight tweaks are made but that essentially is how a DOF model works. It’s why so many managers hate the DOF model.
I can't believe that Mount is ten Hag's one and ONLY target this year. Just concentrate on his other targets for now and if we have 70 million spare at the end of summer, we do this.
Why are transfers always so laboured with this club?
Umm they really aren't. Last year Casemiro, Martinez, Eriksen and Malacia weren't laboured. Antony was the only one you could label as a laboured saga. FDJ was another one.
The year before Ronaldo and Varane weren't long running while Sancho was. The year before that we got DVB, Telles and Cavani without any saga.
This is just a Caf circlejerk where they want transfers resolved within a week and think all our transfers take ages. It's only June right now, if we were to sign Mount in the next couple of weeks this would actually be a fairly swift transfer.
Yep. That fella's a chancer and always presents himself as being the smartest man in the roomChelsea always use Ben for their PR. I’m sure once the deal is agreed on our terms they’ll be a Chelsea spin by Ben.
What?? Who said that he’s our only target? We’ve been heavily linked with Onana?!I can't believe that Mount is ten Hag's one and ONLY target this year. Just concentrate on his other targets for now and if we have 70 million spare at the end of summer, we do this.
Why are transfers always so laboured with this club?
I literally said that it’s different at every club. So at City, you’d think, Pep being who he is, more or less gets the rule of the roost. If it was someone else however, I don’t think he’d have as much freedom as Pep gets.This is crazy…. So there’s me thinking Pep was the guy at City. But it’s Taxiri calling the shots.
Have abit of perspective mate. If the DoF and manager are in disagreement the DoF has F’d up.
I can't believe that Mount is ten Hag's one and ONLY target this year. Just concentrate on his other targets for now and if we have 70 million spare at the end of summer, we do this.
Why are transfers always so laboured with this club?
A lot happens in a year. Frankly, I doubt we wait. We have issues that need sorting now.If he doesn't choose us, then he doesn't really want to come to us and there's no point overthinking it.
What?? Who said that he’s our only target? We’ve been heavily linked with Onana?!
I literally said that it’s different at every club. So at City, you’d think, Pep being who he is, more or less gets the rule of the roost. If it was someone else however, I don’t think he’d have as much freedom as Pep gets.
I can't imagine the mental gymnastics you'd have to leap through to even imagine that's the case. Nobody has even remotely suggested that.