Mason Mount | Confirmed

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah ideally we need to sell Fred & McTominay and bring in someone who has flexibility to cover & partner Casa,player who can progress in from deep and Mount. Obviously we don’t get all three this summer so if you had to choose two?
Yeah partner/cover for Case would be ideal, and if we could only get one, one of McT and Fred would probably stay. And United can return to Mount in the next summer
 
The move only makes sense to me if as you say we are also signing a secod midfielder, with probable exits that would be a good thing within the squad. But I wonder how they fit in, as there are still probably three midfield spots and Casemeiro and Fernandes occupy two of them, though much stronger competition fo Fernandes especially isnt a bad thing.

But personally I prefer a midfield signing that offers a more all round option in all areas of the field and I think Caqueret and Barella both fit that kind of profile. Previous poster labels Caqueret lightweight, bu they are both fighters and I disagree with that, Kante is pretty lightweight for example.

Biggest bugbear is w are going to overpay for a player yet again in our fitst deal of the summer....sets a precedent in further negotiations for us I feel
I also want to see us sign a midfielder who is comfortable working from a deeper role and help with the build up play against high pressing teams. But it seems like we're trying to get the Mount deal done early due to him wanting to join us over the likes of Liverpool and Arsenal. And also due to his ability in the middle and attacking third both with and without the ball and he's still only 24 years old.

I think Kante was physically superior to Caqueret where his speed and athleticism complimented his ability on the ball where he could control large spaces defensively and also contribute on the ball. I like Caqueret but it seems he's not dynamic enough for the way the EPL is currently heading where the top teams are getting more aggressive in their on the ball attacking in high lines and front foot defending.

I do think a deeper lying midfielder will be bought. I think the South American market will probably be tapped into with Jose Mayorga (South American scout) now in charge of the recruitment department with Simon Wells. There's players like Alan Varela (Boca Juniors) and Andre Trinidade (Fluminense) who look like interesting deep lying midfield options who we could take a chance on.
 
As was Weghorst. As was Antony.
That's OK with me really. Weghorst was sought for a particular role and Antony is a player who seems to have bought into the overall long term development plan and wants to be here.

I was originally unenthused by Mount but the more I've seen, the more positive I've felt. Chelsea fans generally seem to rate him highly and it actually seems as though Mason wants to come here rather and regenerate his career rather than just for the £££ or to spite Chelsea management for overlooking him.

That's something that's been missing from a lot of transactions over the last decade, the desire to be here and then win. Really enjoyed the info and comments from the Chelsea mob on here BTW, been helpful!
 
Yeah partner/cover for Case would be ideal, and if we could only get one, one of McT and Fred would probably stay. And United can return to Mount in the next summer

We need more than one midfield profile,however my fear is we have to keep one of them
 
An Eriksen replacement.

Against lesser teams it'll be Casemiro with Mount and Bruno ahead of him.

In tougher games it might be Casemiro, Mount or Bruno and a Fred/McT/new signing?

Eriksen was always a stop-gap signing. He'll still play plenty of games this season, but certainly won't be starting week in week out.

I see him as a Fred replacement tbh.

You look at how Fred was used last season. He was pretty much box2box, used to press and but he was licensed to get forward more than he's done previously. Mount will do that role, hes workout will help, as per Fred's, with the press but he's better passer and better going forward. So he'll play a similar role. Yeah he'll probably start more games than Eriksen, but i think when Eriksen plays won't be doing the same thing Mount does.
 
I also want to see us sign a midfielder who is comfortable working from a deeper role and help with the build up play against high pressing teams. But it seems like we're trying to get the Mount deal done early due to him wanting to join us over the likes of Liverpool and Arsenal. And also due to his ability in the middle and attacking third both with and without the ball and he's still only 24 years old.

I think Kante was physically superior to Caqueret where his speed and athleticism complimented his ability on the ball where he could control large spaces defensively and also contribute on the ball. I like Caqueret but it seems he's not dynamic enough for the way the EPL is currently heading where the top teams are getting more aggressive in their on the ball attacking in high lines and front foot defending.

I do think a deeper lying midfielder will be bought. I think the South American market will probably be tapped into with Jose Mayorga (South American scout) now in charge of the recruitment department with Simon Wells. There's players like Alan Varela (Boca Juniors) and Andre Trinidade (Fluminense) who look like interesting deep lying midfield options who we could take a chance on.

Are you saying we will sign a deeper lying midfielder this summer or did you mean next window as was a bit confused
 
I think Chelsea is delaying everything until after July 1st for FFP. Wrapping up all the deals right now as the FFP numbers are right for the FFP closing window on June 30th. Some people are just really glued to the Twitter noise.
 
We need more than one midfield profile,however my fear is we have to keep one of them

I doubt we'd be able to get rid of both in a summer.

I'd be shocked if we could sell Fred for a fee, since he is in the last year of his contract. Anything we get for him would be a bonus.
 
I doubt we'd be able to get rid of both in a summer.

I'd be shocked if we could sell Fred for a fee, since he is in the last year of his contract. Anything we get for him would be a bonus.

Yeah I can't see us selling both either
 
We should walk away from this and wait for them to come back with a better deal. Years of over paying and having our pants pulled down on transfers is still biting us in the arse.

Chelsea are only asking for so much because Woodward would have paid it. They’re testing Murtough now to see if they can do the same thing. We have to take a stand at some point and say no to over inflated deals.

They will be left with a player they clearly see as not needed, who doesn’t want to be there leaving for nothing next season. They stand to lose a lot more than we do out of not accepting a deal.
Agreed. If we bow down to their demands now, it’ll set a precedence for other teams to pull our pants down time and time again.
 
We need more than one midfield profile,however my fear is we have to keep one of them
Which ones better to keep though? That should be the question. I think Fred will attract more interest just because he’s Brazilian. No matter which one stays there gonna be a squad player at most anyway.
 
Which ones better to keep though? That should be the question. I think Fred will attract more interest just because he’s Brazilian. No matter which one stays there gonna be a squad player at most anyway.

Fred gets more interest but McTominay would most likely get us more money
 
My only concern is still no cover for Casa,despite what people had said that's why I hoped we would sign Rabiot on a free
That's what he means by a first phase midfielder, someone who can pick the ball up from deeper.
 
That's what he means by a first phase midfielder, someone who can pick the ball up from deeper.

Yeah still hoping we sign one,however suspect it will be the next window. Think this one is about Mount and cheap cover for Casa
 
I doubt we'd be able to get rid of both in a summer.

I'd be shocked if we could sell Fred for a fee, since he is in the last year of his contract. Anything we get for him would be a bonus.

Fred is a Brazil international playing for one of the best club sides in the world. If Chelsea can aim for £70m for Mount, surely even we can get £15m for Fred from someone?
 
Yeah still hoping we sign one,however suspect it will be the next window. Think this one is about Mount and cheap cover for Casa
Would make sense to sign Mount aswell as Rabiot like you’ve mentioned before. He’ll be the cover for Casa and can easily play alongside if Bruno or Mount need a rest. All in all though this window should mainly be about signing a top class ST and quality keeper that fits the managers style.
 
Would make sense to sign Mount aswell as Rabiot like you’ve mentioned before. He’ll be the cover for Casa and can easily play alongside if Bruno or Mount need a rest. All in all though this window should mainly be about signing a top class ST and quality keeper that fits the managers style.

Rabiot looks off the table now,however Onana & Kane would be huge signings. I suspect it will be Hojlund/Kolo-Muani though
 
Rabiot looks off the table now,however Onana & Kane would be huge signings. I suspect it will be Hojlund/Kolo-Muani though
Ye looking most likely Hojlund. Not seen much links to us with the other guy. Ideally we’d like to sign Hojlund and Kane or Kane next season on a free if he doesn’t sign a new contract.
 
Ye looking most likely Hojlund. Not seen much links to us with the other guy. Ideally we’d like to sign Hojlund and Kane or Kane next season on a free if he doesn’t sign a new contract.

Only way we could have got both this summer was if new owners were already in place
 
I see him as a Fred replacement tbh.

You look at how Fred was used last season. He was pretty much box2box, used to press and but he was licensed to get forward more than he's done previously. Mount will do that role, hes workout will help, as per Fred's, with the press but he's better passer and better going forward. So he'll play a similar role. Yeah he'll probably start more games than Eriksen, but i think when Eriksen plays won't be doing the same thing Mount does.
If this is how ETh views Mount than I can imagine he’ll get 10 goals atleast, given how many chances Fred missed.
 
Ye looking most likely Hojlund. Not seen much links to us with the other guy. Ideally we’d like to sign Hojlund and Kane or Kane next season on a free if he doesn’t sign a new contract.
Not so sure, his club want Kane money for him and he’s still only a prospect. Might price us out of a deal - it be in a Antony situation whereby we have an awful lot of money invested into a player who doesn’t hit the ground running and instead takes time to adjust.
 
Fred is a Brazil international playing for one of the best club sides in the world. If Chelsea can aim for £70m for Mount, surely even we can get £15m for Fred from someone?

They aim for it, but they wont get it. They look like they will getting £60 mill. Ish. Look at it this way; if you think both players is worth zero at the age of 34 a value of £60 mill and £20 mill will give them a yearly value/cost of £6 mill and £5 mill. Considering the years between 24 and 32 are usually better than the years between 30 and 34 that difference should be bigger (assuming the players were equally good). I think £15 mill, as you say, would be fair for Fred.

But I also think Mount is higher rated. He is being linked to Arsenal, Liverpool, Bayern and Man Utd. Fred is linked to Fulham.
 
Not so sure, his club want Kane money for him and he’s still only a prospect. Might price us out of a deal - it be in a Antony situation whereby we have an awful lot of money invested into a player who doesn’t hit the ground running and instead takes time to adjust.

So maybe Kolo-Muani then
 
ETH must take a good deal of responsibility for transfers - good or bad.
I have similar concerns but I think it's the clubs fault if things go bad for as they're not adding much value if they are just going to be told who to sign by ETH.
 
I've given up mate..:lol:
Your track record of signings you’ve hyped up that have lived up to the hype is bordering on psychic, you need to get someone to sign you up as a scout at this point :lol:
 
Move on to the next target. If Mount is committed to coming, sign him to a pre-contract in January.
 
Move on to the next target. If Mount is committed to coming, sign him to a pre-contract in January.
I agree we need to move on but we cannot do the January thing because he plays in the same league.
 
Hope we move on ASAP, Liverpool have already strengthened, same with Madrid, arsenal and City seem to have all but tied up havertz and kovacic and both teams making moves on rice. Let's not create a transfer saga over mount who is hardly going to transform us into to genuine title contenders
 
The contract situation isn't the only factor at play though. We're also operating within a tight budget in a summer where we need to sign quite a few players. If we overspend on Mount, that has direct consequences on which striker we can sign later in the window.

In the grand scheme I'm sure we can afford to pay it but it's not as simple as saying that it's only £5m. It's actually a £20m increase on the original offer if we did cave, in a situation where we hold all the cards. If we're prepared to take that kind of hit on every transfer this summer just because the selling team is being awkward, that accumulates very quickly. If we signed 5 players and did that for all of them, that's £25m just by virtue of being poor negotiators.

If Chelsea don't play ball after we amend the structure of the payments, we'd be absolutely right to move on. The player can then see we've exhausted all options to make the deal happen and so will the manager. Even if Mount is a key target for ten Hag, he'll be acutely aware that we're operating within a restricted budget. We can't continue to push those thresholds for the sake of one player. This is how most normal clubs operate, we're just so used to paying stupid fees for players that our fanbase has become desensitised to it.

We're talking about 5%-10% on our highest priority signings, not £5m on every signing. I also reject the idea that other clubs don't do this, especially clubs in similar positions to ours. Chelsea with Fernandez. Liverpool with Nunez. City with Grealish. I expect Arsenal and Newcastle will start to do the same, now that they are looking at a higher bracket of player, to try and improve their team. Spurs tend not to overpay, but they also tend not to win anything.

I fail to see a world where we are £5m short for an elite striker, I'm sure there are measures we could take to get avoid this. My guess also is that we aren't getting Kane or Osimhen so we are probably compromising on our striker target already. So we should miss out on our first choice #8 (or whatever position he will play) so that we have £5m more to go after our 3rd, 4th, 5th choice striker?

I do wonder what people think happens when we "walk away" though. Teams won't start offering us better deals on their players. Our scouting doesn't improve. We don't suddenly become better at identifying good value deals before other clubs. The way to develop the reputation of being shrewd negotiators is to become shrewd negotiators and in order to do that we are going to need to walk away from a lot of deals and honestly change our entire transfer policy to going after mostly unproven players.
 
Missing out on Mount only to sign Caicedo instead is like leaning in to snog Susan Boyle, tripping over and landing face first in Kelly Brook.

I'd be surprised if Caicedo is who we turn to if we don't get Mount. They're wildly different players, would require completely different tactical set ups and if we were that flexible about the type of #8 we wanted it would be odd not to prefer Caicedo from the start given he's a bigger talent.

It's more likely that we'd move on to some other player in the same attacking #8 mold as Mount, I would think.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.