Mason Mount | Confirmed

Status
Not open for further replies.
Chelsea have picked a really “strange” i.e. wrong player to make whatever point they are trying to make. Kovacic is being gifted to City. For Havertz who they bought for a lot of money they have accepted the bid. But their own academy player who is making peanuts (wages) and who cost them zero transfer fee and has 1 year left, they are making everything unnecessarily difficult for him.
 
Hope we don't give in and offer the 60 mill they want. Walk away United.
 
We are looking to bring in other players, ST, GK etc, so all the selling clubs will be watching how Utd handle this situation.
If we cave in to Chelsea, it’ll be making a rod for our own backs and every other player we try to buy will end up with the same problem.
OK, obviously we’ve already been seen to be a soft touch for a quite a few years, but it’s time to put a stop to it.
 
So we're £10m apart, with Chelsea open to further negotiations. Another £5m-ish probably gets this done. One of our primary targets over the line, in time for pre-season and yet everyone is demanding we walk away. I get some don't fancy the player (he wasn't top of my list either), but imagine this exact situation happened last year with FDJ and the board played chicken over these amounts.

If he aint the guy, then we need to look at the people who identify our targets, but once we have decided on them, we shouldn't be pulling out at late stage negotiations to save face.

We also shouldn't be making public "take it or leave it" offers, if that isn't our intentions.
 
Unfortunately my targets end up going to other clubs after I start the hype well in advance. Caicedo, Guimaraes and Tchoumeni etc..

Well Jassim is meant to be a fan of Camavinga so maybe we could get him if he gets the club of course
 
So we're £10m apart, with Chelsea open to further negotiations. Another £5m-ish probably gets this done. One of our primary targets over the line, in time for pre-season and yet everyone is demanding we walk away. I get some don't fancy the player (he wasn't top of my list either), but imagine this exact situation happened last year with FDJ and the board played chicken over these amounts.

If he aint the guy, then we need to look at the people who identify our targets, but once we have decided on them, we shouldn't be pulling out at late stage negotiations to save face.
Chelsea have to sell, Mount is pushing, we don't really need to up anything. We can stay at the table but let mount push before they fold.
 
Chelsea have picked a really “strange” i.e. wrong player to make whatever point they are trying to make. Kovacic is being gifted to City. For Havertz who they bought for a lot of money they have accepted the bid. But their own academy player who is making peanuts (wages) and who cost them zero transfer fee and has 1 year left, they are making everything unnecessarily difficult for him.

It‘s because this is the most important sale for FFP. It is seen as 100% profit as they didn’t buy him.
 
Looks like this will be done, going by the tweets from BBC, Ornstein and Chelsea journalists, it's clear that they will meet and come to an agreement.
 
Looks like this will be done, going by the tweets from BBC, Ornstein and Chelsea journalists, it's clear that they will meet and come to an agreement.

Just hope Utd realise that caving will make it even more difficult when negotiating future deals
 
Chelsea have picked a really “strange” i.e. wrong player to make whatever point they are trying to make. Kovacic is being gifted to City. For Havertz who they bought for a lot of money they have accepted the bid. But their own academy player who is making peanuts (wages) and who cost them zero transfer fee and has 1 year left, they are making everything unnecessarily difficult for him.

They know we’ll cave and pay up just like we always do. See Maguire, Wan Bissaka, Antony etc etc

The fact that Macalister & Kovacic went for around £35 mil and we’re sat here still negotiating for Mount with a year left on his contract at £55/60 mil shows how incompetent we are. £40 mil should have been our take it or leave it offer, not our starting point.

And if it’s Erik pushing the club to keep going higher or pay whatever it takes to get it done then it’s an absolutely bizarre hill for him to die on.
 
This one does have the feel of a deal being imminent, but it would be an outstanding FY if United could grow a pair and tell Chelsea to take the offer or feck off.
 
To be fair we have said it’s our final offer
We have? Do you believe that? Pretty similar to the 'final round of negotiations' before the Glazers loop again.

We'll pay Caciedo money at this rate, for Mount... in the final year of his contract. Painful.
 
Chelsea are deluded. He is out of contract in 1 year. United hold all the cards. I think we can be chill on this one and wait.
 
So we're £10m apart, with Chelsea open to further negotiations. Another £5m-ish probably gets this done. One of our primary targets over the line, in time for pre-season and yet everyone is demanding we walk away. I get some don't fancy the player (he wasn't top of my list either), but imagine this exact situation happened last year with FDJ and the board played chicken over these amounts.

If he aint the guy, then we need to look at the people who identify our targets, but once we have decided on them, we shouldn't be pulling out at late stage negotiations to save face.

We also shouldn't be making public "take it or leave it" offers, if that isn't our intentions.

You are assuming we we valued him at £55m. This was our third offer, a rare occasion where I think we have been quick and generous with out bids. Chelsea signed Sterling last summer with a year left on his contract for much less than they are asking for Mount. An Sterling wasnt coming off a shocking season. He is worth no more than £50m, above £60m is madness. Especially when he isn't a crucial position for us this summer.
 
Look at the impact of going all in for the number 1 target. Instead of walking away and getting someone else than Antony, we paid 85m for him. In January we were then too broke to get a forward then there we were with weghorst. It's been said a few times but Salah wasn't Liverpool's 1st choice.

Salah wasn't their first choice, but at that juncture, United didn't have many other options. Not sure another left-footed winger/forward was available or identified with the coaching setup and scouting setup to really impact the team in a positive way. Antony was an overpay, totally, but feel like he can come good. Ajax also hurt themselves by dragging it out.

And I don't agree with the January window, as there just weren't any CFs of requisite quality available. Gakpo didn't play as a CF and was okay, nothing to write home about. United got 3rd place and a cup, and another cup final even with Wout, don't think much would have changed.
 
Oh no, we might get a very good player that the manager wants instead of some muppet's preferred target/flavour of the month. What a disaster! Better spit out our dummies and throw our toys out of the pram.
Or he will prove another overrated and overplayed Juan Mata.
He's literally the opposite to Juan Mata, so how would that work?
 
Just hope Utd realise that caving will make it even more difficult when negotiating future deals

Shouldn't mean we caved. Chelsea have offered to meet in person to resolve the issue. So there is a clear indication from all 3 parties to get this done. As per few tweets, they didn't reject the bid, they have countered with new offer and also offered to meet in person to come to agreement. This one should be done quickly.
 
Yeah! I can see Chelsea going for that! Please take our player and our money! :lol:

What other choice do they have? He's not signing for them. Its the same as each time our player has a year left and doesnt want to stay. We have to make other arrangements
 
I agree and wiith what somebody else respnded, its why we need new owners to for a more consiistent budget as much as a bigger one.

The stories seem to say we wont walk away, which is fooolish. I think this deal goes through and its £60m+ high 50s and lower add on or vice versa.

I would rather Caqueret who I think would be nearer £40 and maybe under.....or Caicedo or Barella for more. This isnt just my personal opinion that they are all better players and offer more as a career here....I think all three bring more all round to the probably role Mount would be filling.I think Mount offers a lot in the final third for us as an attacking threar and pressing, but I think we are weakest over all parts of the middle third of the pitch end to end....the other three I feel offer far more than Mount, not just defensively either

Caqueret is so lightweight and can be had if the club were truly interested, same for other clubs looking at better value players.

There should be more talent players, but how they all fit together and within a position based system across the PL and CL under EtH remains to be seen. I'd trust EtH, the coaches, and Murtough on understanding who their targets are and saying okay, we have access to these players and these are the fall back players. I think Mount fits well with what EtH is trying to do and it does help he's a very good English player, for a club that has been known to trust and play young, talented English players.
 
If we sign Mount on a 5 year contract we will be paying him circa £200k/week along with lets says a £55m transfer fee. Thats £107m over the course of the contract. Thats £410,000/week along with paying a large chunk of that up front. He would 100% be commanding a very high salary as a free agent.
So the £55m transfer fee now goes to the player instead of to the club that owns him, is that what you're suggesting? Why amortize the transfer fee into his salary? I doubt he's on £200k/week even if we do sign him this window instead of next. He's not "proven" in the way that Casemiro was. I certainly hope we're not starting him at £200k/week, at least!
 
They know we’ll cave and pay up just like we always do. See Maguire, Wan Bissaka, Antony etc etc

The fact that Macalister & Kovacic went for around £35 mil and we’re sat here still negotiating for Mount with a year left on his contract at £55/60 mil shows how incompetent we are. £40 mil should have been our take it or leave it offer, not our starting point.

And if it’s Erik pushing the club to keep going higher or pay whatever it takes to get it done then it’s an absolutely bizarre hill for him to die on.

This. It's a blatant overpay. The fact we scored the market and came up with £60m for Mount being the best way to spend our money makes me shudder to think what else we have in store. We don't have an unlimited budget either unlike some other clubs.
.
 
Have to admire Mount, he wants to move here badly and I'm all for it.

Restructure the deal so it remains the same effective cost but easier for Chelsea to get the final £5m and call it a day.
 
Caqueret is so lightweight and can be had if the club were truly interested, same for other clubs looking at better value players.

There should be more talent players, but how they all fit together and within a position based system across the PL and CL under EtH remains to be seen. I'd trust EtH, the coaches, and Murtough on understanding who their targets are and saying okay, we have access to these players and these are the fall back players. I think Mount fits well with what EtH is trying to do and it does help he's a very good English player, for a club that has been known to trust and play young, talented English players.
Agreed.

It seems like ten Hag wants a central player who can go from the middle third to the final third and have the intelligence to press effectively in tandem with the rest of the team. And that is what Mount provides along with being quick and agile.

Mount isn't a alternative to a deeper lying midfielder.

And I do believe the club will sign a player to occupy a deeper role in midfield as well. And this player will be someone who will be comfortable operating in the defensive third in possession as well as having the game to advance into the middle third and connect with the advanced central and wide attackers.

And hopefully Onana or another capable keeper in possession will provide the free man option in the build up phase which will hopefully make our build up smoother from deeper areas and result in the game being played in the opponent's half with the press and counter press as another weapon to break the opponent down without the ball.
 
Deadline day 100m + Rashford.

Chelsea have our number, they don't believe we will give up. Keep rejecting and keep getting the price up.
 
People should also note that what we do or do not do here sets a precedent for us for the remainder of the summer - get bent over for Mount and the price of every other player we go in for goes up heftily, too.

Have to truly hope we are not this incompetent and lacking in foresight.
 
Agreed.

It seems like ten Hag wants a central player who can go from the middle third to the final third and have the intelligence to press effectively in tandem with the rest of the team. And that is what Mount provides along with being quick and agile.

Mount isn't a alternative to a deeper lying midfielder.

And I do believe the club will sign a player to occupy a deeper role in midfield as well. And this player will be someone who will be comfortable operating in the defensive third in possession as well as having the game to advance into the middle third and connect with the advanced central and wide attackers.

And hopefully Onana or another capable keeper in possession will provide the free man option in the build up phase which will hopefully make our build up smoother from deeper areas and result in the game being played in the opponent's half with the press and counter press as another weapon to break the opponent down without the ball.

I think that player to occupy the deeper role will be pushed back to next window,unless we can pick up someone for a cheap fee in addition to Mount
 
People should also note that what we do or do not do here sets a precedent for us for the remainder of the summer - get bent over for Mount and the price of every other player we go in for goes up heftily, too.

Have to truly hope we are not this incompetent and lacking in foresight
.
How’s our track record in this department? ;)
 
So will it be Boehly who meets Murtough and Arnold? If so, it will be difficult to predict who will talk the most crap during that meeting?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.