didz
Full Member
- Joined
- May 17, 2014
- Messages
- 4,371
He'll feature against Liverpool surely with Bruno's absence, off the bench most likely.
He was reported as out for a month on November 24th, so he's probably still a week or so away.
He'll feature against Liverpool surely with Bruno's absence, off the bench most likely.
I wasn't aware of this. Oh well.He was reported as out for a month on November 24th, so he's probably still a week or so away.
Good lad
Yeah - should just shut up, stop supporting his teammates and stop being injured.No. His tweet is a pathetic attempt to curry favour with the fans after contributing absolutely nothing since signing for the club.
It’s not his account.No. His tweet is a pathetic attempt to curry favour with the fans after contributing absolutely nothing since signing for the club.
He is on ridiculous wages as well isn’t he?What a signing, a masterclass of a transfer.
250-300k per week Murtough masterclassHe is on ridiculous wages as well isn’t he?
Another player we will be stuck with forever because we can’t shift them on those high wages.
So we're holding Mount responsible for fan accounts now?No. His tweet is a pathetic attempt to curry favour with the fans after contributing absolutely nothing since signing for the club.
As should everyone, but that is not the Caf's way, the Caf's way is the one of constant moaning before he even played half a season worth of games!Oh ffs. He's hardly got a game yet. I'll wait till he's played a bit.
If these five are indeed our boxes to tick for the recruitment team, we are well and truly fecked - but it sounds about right. Three of them have nothing to do with football, one is very subjective and being experienced can be said about a thousand of footballers.I think on paper Mount ticked every box for both the manager and the board.
English
Experienced (International, Premier League, CL)
Good Looking/Marketable
Manager admired him
Last year on his contract
But ever since he arrived it's been a total fail! Hopefully at some stage he can start to revive his career a little on the pitch.
250-300k per week Murtough masterclass
I just looked at his stats, apart from one good season they are really underwhelming. More than ever I am left wondering what exactly he is for....I was leery on this transfer because of the reported wages he was being offered. Means there's not way out if it all goes tits up. Another Sancho, Martial, De Gea etc situation. I'd put Antony on there as well.
If INEOS is taking over, I hope they are smart enough to consider changing our wage structure. Performance based.
Christ we love to waste transfer funds. Not to mention we could have just waited a year and signed him on a free rather than spend £60M on a very injury prone player with a year left on his contract.250-300k per week Murtough masterclass
If these five are indeed our boxes to tick for the recruitment team, we are well and truly fecked - but it sounds about right. Three of them have nothing to do with football, one is very subjective and being experienced can be said about a thousand of footballers.
I think on paper Mount ticked every box for both the manager and the board.
English
Experienced (International, Premier League, CL)
Good Looking/Marketable
Manager admired him
Last year on his contract
But ever since he arrived it's been a total fail! Hopefully at some stage he can start to revive his career a little on the pitch.
Where is he? Like genuinely. He’s been back since 1st December . Why’s he not making squads ?
Oh ffs. He's hardly got a game yet. I'll wait till he's played a bit.
True but he can be judged for not playing games. Because he’s forever injured. That could be a reason a lot of people didn’t want us to to sign him aswell. Another wasted player we can’t use… just adds to our injury list.As should everyone, but that is not the Caf's way, the Caf's way is the one of constant moaning before he even played half a season worth of games!
To be fair he wasn't this fragile. If anything he was dependable, fitness wiseI don't know what the club thought they were getting when the bought him. He is exactly as expected.
Very valid to question a transfer who’s missed half the season and offered nothing when he has played, nothing weird about it. Referring to everything as weird is incredibly childish.Why are people criticising him when he's not playing? Some absolute weirdos on this forum
The English Donnie Van De Beak.Very valid to question a transfer who’s missed half the season and offered nothing when he has played, nothing weird about it. Referring to everything as weird is incredibly childish.
Very valid to question a transfer who’s missed half the season and offered nothing when he has played, nothing weird about it. Referring to everything as weird is incredibly childish.
I have no idea why some people are intent on hating on Mount, as if he did something bad to them personally. It took him some time to settle, but I think he already showed flashes of what he can offer this team: receiving the ball on the turn, playing immediate cutting forward passes, covering a ton of ground, shooting from distance, corner kicks, and so on.
He's barely featured. 12 appearances total, 8 in the league for 400 minutes (so about half of each of those 8 games), 2 in the CL for a combined 91 minutes, and 2 in the EFL Cup for 135 combined minutes. He's played 626 minutes out of a possible 1080.
It was reminiscent our pathetic chase of FDJ, who was never coming. He's an solid Premier league player and thats is. One purple patch season. Just cannot see how he improves us. Maddison was a steal and a great upgrade for aging Eriksen. We also needed a decent DM, certainly not Amrabat. ETH is a shocking judge of players and why I am sure he will be gone once Ineos in controlThe main reason he gets so much hate is the fact he was our priority signing. It took ages to negotiate with Chelsea and we ended up massively overpaying for a player who had 1 year left on his contract. We missed out on several other chances (notably Kim). And now he turned out to be not only injury prone, but also somehow unable to fit in as a CM, which had been obvious for many here. We could have used his money to sign better players, that's it.
That's an interesting argument. So the opinions of people that have seen him play for England and Chelsea for a number of years are discounting him not on how he has performed or on his output for both of those teams, but on the fact that he isn't a sexy foreign signing? Isn't it possible that some people didn't particularly rate him before we were even linked to him, and his struggles to fit in since joining has compounded their skepticism? As the ancient proverb goes, it ain't that deep.He wasn't an exciting signing because he has already played in the league and they've seen him for England and Chelsea, so they want to be right on the transfer from the beginning to feel like actual scouts. That's why they hope he plays like shit each game, and jerk each other off in celebration when he doesn't score or assist. They'd rather sign Molombu N'drogbo from Sochaux in Ligue 2 and suggest he would transform the way we play, because he is unknown. It is what it is. Fans are fecking stupid.
I've posted before, several friends with Chelsea season tickets. Consensus was great money for them, Mount had been 'found out' and not a loss.That's an interesting argument. So the opinions of people that have seen him play for England and Chelsea for a number of years are discounting him not on how he has performed or on his output for both of those teams, but on the fact that he isn't a sexy foreign signing? Isn't it possible that some people didn't particularly rate him before we were even linked to him, and his struggles to fit in since joining has compounded their skepticism? As the ancient proverb goes, it ain't that deep.