No offence intended, but you’re clearly utterly clueless on this matter.
I can assure you that the recanting of a statement doesn’t qualify as ‘new material coming to light’ - the CPS have even gone so far as to separate the two points in the statement for you.
I don’t want to get into the endless, fruitless back and forths that this thread is now synonymous with, but just had to point this out.
‘New material coming to light’ will absolutely not be the recanting of a statement.
It’s also very unlikely that it’s even referring to a new statement as that would, in most cases, be described as ‘additional statements / information’.
‘New material’, in a case that has clearly been entirely built around an audio snippet will almost certainly be linked to that initial material in some way, and given that we know that the audio the public heard is a snippet of a longer recording, coupled with the fact that Utd have alluded to the snippet ‘not painting the full picture’, it’s pretty clear that the ‘new material’ is either the rest of the audio or an additional piece of audio material that either changes the context completely, or (more likely imo) shows that Greenwood was talking in a rude, repulsive manner, but didn’t do anything beyond that talking.
The latter would also explain Greenwood / Utd’s lack of an explanation.