soapythecat
Full Member
Did they shake hands at FT?
You would have thought wrong.
While this is true, I don't believe Arnold made any claims that he actually heard the rest of the audio. Am I wrong ?
You would have thought wrong.
It's weird when some media outlets star out a letter in rapist.
I find human beings to be hypocritical and unforgiving. We speak about giving convicts another chance in the society but cant allow a teenager another chance to earn a decent living.
Alonso killed a man while drunk-driving but was able to erk a decent career, why not give Greenwood another chance at life you holier than thou ''decent human beings''
All I see in this is a classical case of ''schadenfreude''
This is not saying I condone what he might have done, tragedy happens and he no longer plays for his boyhood club and in all likelihood will never hit the projected heights again, the alleged victim withdrew the case, they have a family now and surely she would want the best for him.
Taking a man livelihood is akin to killing him.
Well we know that the victim tried to withdraw from April 2022. Charges were made in October 2022 despite this.
The CPS do not make decisions over someone's guilt, only if they should face a court. The two questions the CPS has to consider when making charges are "Does the evidence provide a realistic prospect of conviction?" and "Is it in the public interest to prosecute?"
In October 2022, after the alleged victim made attempts to cancel the investigation, the CPS charged Greenwood because the evidence at the time provided a realistic prospect of conviction and/or it was in the public interest to prosecute.
Between October and Feb 2023 the case was closed due to witnesses withdrawing and new material coming to the light. If the new material is a redacted statement, the likelihood is that redaction is from April 2022 (or not long after) and was already known to the CPS when they decided to press charges. So this wouldn't have been new material - it was already existing material they were aware of at the time of prosecution.
The likelihood is that the new material isn't a redacted statement and I think you know this too. Nothing in the timelines we know or the information in the public domain suggests this.
You, and myself, also do not know what statements were provided by the alleged victim to begin with and any redactions made. What we do know is the alleged victim did try to cancel the investigation 5 months prior to charges being applied.
For full transparency and to ensure we are both talking about the same thing. Can you possibly provide a source which expands on this point, "You can withdraw as a witness without recanting the statements you've already made". It would help me understand your theory better if I can read the legal text which explains what you're suggesting. I'm struggling to find anything myself so feel we need to clarify this.
Richard Arnold clearly said that the audio was a part of a longer recording alongside saying he was provided alternative explanations for the recording.
"We were provided with alternative explanations for the audio recording, which was a short excerpt from a much longer recording"
Explanations is the operative word of course and the following line is further evidence he likely didn't listen to it "While we were unable to access certain evidence for reasons we respect".
They does not mean the CPS didn't access it and that it wasn't potentially the new material which influenced the case being dropped. If the CPS didn't have access to it then Richard Arnold's statement could incriminate whoever was in hold of the tape for perverting the course of justice through the withholding of crucial evidence.
You seem to discount the likelihood that the new material referenced by the CPS is an extended audio or other evidence. Instead pushing that it's actually a redacted statement from a witness who attempted to cancel the investigation 5 months prior to Greenwood being charged. In which case its existing material and not new material.
Unless you believe it was redacted after October 2022 which would imply Richard Arnold is lying or knowingly being misleading when he says:
"The alleged victim requested the police to drop their investigation in April 2022."
And lastly please do provide your source which explains your witness withdrawing/redacted statement claim better as this will allow me to better understand what you're suggesting happened in the timeline.
Bellingham, what a cnut! And shame on all those that praise him for saying that. By all means dont shake his hands, ignore him and all that but resulting to names/comments is not sportsmanship.
How would the latter explain the lack of an explanation?No offence intended, but you’re clearly utterly clueless on this matter.
I can assure you that the recanting of a statement doesn’t qualify as ‘new material coming to light’ - the CPS have even gone so far as to separate the two points in the statement for you.
I don’t want to get into the endless, fruitless back and forths that this thread is now synonymous with, but just had to point this out.
‘New material coming to light’ will absolutely not be the recanting of a statement.
It’s also very unlikely that it’s even referring to a new statement as that would, in most cases, be described as ‘additional statements / information’.
‘New material’, in a case that has clearly been entirely built around an audio snippet will almost certainly be linked to that initial material in some way, and given that we know that the audio the public heard is a snippet of a longer recording, coupled with the fact that Utd have alluded to the snippet ‘not painting the full picture’, it’s pretty clear that the ‘new material’ is either the rest of the audio or an additional piece of audio material that either changes the context completely, or (more likely imo) shows that Greenwood was talking in a rude, repulsive manner, but didn’t do anything beyond that talking.
The latter would also explain Greenwood / Utd’s lack of an explanation.
[
So in your opinion there's no faction that believes he's innocent at this point? It's either those waiting to let the club make up their minds for them, or those that think he's a scumbag that belongs nowhere near the club. Why do you believe that?
He is currently earning 75k/week at a top flight club in spain.I find human beings to be hypocritical and unforgiving. We speak about giving convicts another chance in the society but cant allow a
teenager another chance to earn a decent living.
It really isn't. No one wished or predicted this situation, and no one is happy about it.All I see in this is a classical case of ''schadenfreude''
He will earn more this year than most will earn in a lifetime. He will always have lucrative employment, given how things worked out for him in the end.Taking a man livelihood is akin to killing him..
Another chance at a decent living? Give him another chance at life?....my god just when you think you've read the most drivel possible in this thread someone comes along and tops itI find human beings to be hypocritical and unforgiving. We speak about giving convicts another chance in the society but cant allow a teenager another chance to earn a decent living.
Alonso killed a man while drunk-driving but was able to erk a decent career, why not give Greenwood another chance at life you holier than thou ''decent human beings''
All I see in this is a classical case of ''schadenfreude''
This is not saying I condone what he might have done, tragedy happens and he no longer plays for his boyhood club and in all likelihood will never hit the projected heights again, the alleged victim withdrew the case, they have a family now and surely she would want the best for him.
Taking a man livelihood is akin to killing him.
Is this you?I find human beings to be hypocritical and unforgiving. We speak about giving convicts another chance in the society but cant allow a teenager another chance to earn a decent living.
Alonso killed a man while drunk-driving but was able to erk a decent career, why not give Greenwood another chance at life you holier than thou ''decent human beings''
All I see in this is a classical case of ''schadenfreude''
This is not saying I condone what he might have done, tragedy happens and he no longer plays for his boyhood club and in all likelihood will never hit the projected heights again, the alleged victim withdrew the case, they have a family now and surely she would want the best for him.
Taking a man livelihood is akin to killing him.
Just over a third of your posts are in this thread.What you believe should frankly be irrelevant as the simple facts are that we don’t know the full story. That’s the whole point.
How can you be so certain of his guilt when it’s clear there’s many plausible explanations/alternatives as to why all charges have been dropped and he’s allowed to continue playing football?
Just accept that the people best positioned to make the decision are far more informed then you or I and if the club do decide to bring him back then we should all fully back and support him, the same as we do with every other player.
However from reading some of the comments, I can see that many people have so much hate towards him and have already made up their minds that he’s a rapist/wife beater/scumbag so I think why bother going back and forth with someone with this mindset who’s so judgmental to accept any alternative explanation.
It's weird when some media outlets star out a letter in rapist.
Not sure why I’m wasting one of my 3 replies on this inane comment but are you trying to imply something?Just over a third of your posts are in this thread.
This bolded part for me is the reason why I would give him second chance- if his alleged victim can give him second chance why shouldn't the rest of people?
He most definitely did something wrong, but I doubt we'll ever know to what extent, and that's something he has to live with for the rest of his life.
But, since his wife gave him second chance, decided to even start a family with him, surely there's something positive within him for her to think and act like that.
I'm not angry and you can post where you like. It just seems you expend a lot of your posts in this thread for someone who thinks it's a waste of time debating with most posters in here.Not sure why I’m wasting one of my 3 replies on this inane comment but are you trying to imply something?
I’m a newbie so am limited to what I can comment on.
Does that mean what I’ve said In this thread isn’t valid? Or are you just another angry poster who wants to shut down anyone who does brainlessly goes along with your judgemental views?
You're quite the editor Rood, respect where it's due.
Just because you say the part in bold, doesn't make it true. I would argue Occam's razor here - the most likely solution is the most obvious: that he's a vile, violent, entitled shithead who's possibly even an attempted rapist.What you believe should frankly be irrelevant as the simple facts are that we don’t know the full story. That’s the whole point.
How can you be so certain of his guilt when it’s clear there’s many plausible explanations/alternatives as to why all charges have been dropped and he’s allowed to continue playing football?
Just accept that the people best positioned to make the decision are far more informed then you or I and if the club do decide to bring him back then we should all fully back and support him, the same as we do with every other player.
However from reading some of the comments, I can see that many people have so much hate towards him and have already made up their minds that he’s a rapist/wife beater/scumbag so I think why bother going back and forth with someone with this mindset who’s so judgmental to accept any alternative explanation.
It's weird when some media outlets star out a letter in rapist.
He did that himselfI find human beings to be hypocritical and unforgiving. We speak about giving convicts another chance in the society but cant allow a teenager another chance to earn a decent living.
Alonso killed a man while drunk-driving but was able to erk a decent career, why not give Greenwood another chance at life you holier than thou ''decent human beings''
All I see in this is a classical case of ''schadenfreude''
This is not saying I condone what he might have done, tragedy happens and he no longer plays for his boyhood club and in all likelihood will never hit the projected heights again, the alleged victim withdrew the case, they have a family now and surely she would want the best for him.
Taking a man livelihood is akin to killing him.
Came here for Real Vs Getafe report
Instead get snowflakes Vs incels - embarrassing for all involved
I find human beings to be hypocritical and unforgiving. We speak about giving convicts another chance in the society but cant allow a teenager another chance to earn a decent living.
Alonso killed a man while drunk-driving but was able to erk a decent career, why not give Greenwood another chance at life you holier than thou ''decent human beings''
All I see in this is a classical case of ''schadenfreude''
This is not saying I condone what he might have done, tragedy happens and he no longer plays for his boyhood club and in all likelihood will never hit the projected heights again, the alleged victim withdrew the case, they have a family now and surely she would want the best for him.
Taking a man livelihood is akin to killing him.
It’s quite sad seeing he lack of forgiveness in the world these days. People make mistakes when they’re young- sometimes terrible ones- but I believe everyone has the potential to change and become better people
Bellingham, what a cnut! And shame on all those that praise him for saying that. By all means dont shake his hands, ignore him and all that but resulting to names/comments is not sportsmanship.
I find human beings to be hypocritical and unforgiving. We speak about giving convicts another chance in the society but cant allow a teenager another chance to earn a decent living.
Alonso killed a man while drunk-driving but was able to erk a decent career, why not give Greenwood another chance at life you holier than thou ''decent human beings''
All I see in this is a classical case of ''schadenfreude''
This is not saying I condone what he might have done, tragedy happens and he no longer plays for his boyhood club and in all likelihood will never hit the projected heights again, the alleged victim withdrew the case, they have a family now and surely she would want the best for him.
Taking a man livelihood is akin to killing him.
Bellingham, what a cnut! And shame on all those that praise him for saying that. By all means dont shake his hands, ignore him and all that but resulting to names/comments is not sportsmanship.
He’s just a widdle boy who did some hits and now he’s very sorry
Fecking hell, another oneIt’s quite sad seeing he lack of forgiveness in the world these days. People make mistakes when they’re young- sometimes terrible ones- but I believe everyone has the potential to change and become better people
Forgiveness for what? Trying to rape his partner and beating her up?It’s quite sad seeing he lack of forgiveness in the world these days. People make mistakes when they’re young- sometimes terrible ones- but I believe everyone has the potential to change and become better people
Some people just get really upset when people get called out for raping someone. It is impossible to know why that is, though.Drama much?
Could be, although using it in the body text of an article just seems to be a pure editorial decision.. The BBC write up doesn't even disclose what the 'insult' was, oddly.It’s to get around the algorithm isn’t it?
Some people just get really upset when people get called out for raping someone. It is impossible to know why that is, though.