Marouane Fellaini image 27

Marouane Fellaini Belgium flag

2016-17 Performances


View full 2016-17 profile

5.7 Season Average Rating
Appearances
47
Goals
4
Assists
2
Yellow cards
9
Red cards
1
Status
Not open for further replies.
We are trying to be like Madrid, Barcelona, Bayern etc. And Fellaini would not get in any of those teams and that all I care about to be honest.

Its not about agendas or anything persona;, I just think he is an embodiment of the things I don't like in football.

Moyes rated him, Wilmots rated him, LVG rated him and now it looks like Jose (arguably the best manager in the world) rates him.

LVG only tried to sell him in the first season and he couldn't because he picked up an injury. He turned into one of the most important members of the squad afterwards.

Ironically enough, we played our best football with Fellaini in the CAM under Van Gaal. He bagged goals against Spurs, City and Palace at the end of 14/15 which guaranteed our Champions League spot. At the end of last season, he scored goals against Everton and West Ham in the FA Cup which guaranteed our FA Cup final spot. And we would have almost definitely beaten West Ham in the league to guarantee Champions League again if Fellaini wasn't suspended. The fact that both of the goals West Ham scored in that game came from set pieces only strengthens my point.

Yeah cos when he was on the pitch we were great defensively on set pieces weren't we? we were a shambles on set pieces all year long.


I always cringe when people come out with statements like "How is he a professional footballer?", like they could do any better. I even heard someone once say that he's Sunday League quality... Absolute rubbish talk.

How do you know they couldn't do better? have you seen them play?

Some people don't understand the game. They we should play the same Starting 11 every game, when in reality, the best managers change it up to suit their tactics and counter their opponent. We have a squad of 30+, and like it or not, we need Fellaini in the tough physical games. Cause who do we have that's stronger? We need someone that will bully players and get stuck in. People say he concedes fouls... who cares? He's there to break up play. If conceding a foul stops an attack, then job well done. That's what he's there for.

Funny that, Jose said he wants to work with 20 outfield players. And if you have followed Jose's career, you would know that he doesn't rotate that much. He has a settled team and thats who plays day in day out. Anf Fellaini does stupid fouls, not clever ones when a team is in danger but just plain stupid fouls which are unnecessary. Kante is there to break up play and you don't see him doing a bunch of stupid fouls. Fellaini is no DM/CM never has been and never will be.

Like I said before, people will remember this sloppy error which can easily be put down to the quality of the pitch... but they will happily forget about Smalling nearly costing us the FA Cup with his stupidity. Why is that?
 
We are trying to be like Madrid, Barcelona, Bayern etc. And Fellaini would not get in any of those teams and that all I care about to be honest.

Its not about agendas or anything persona;, I just think he is an embodiment of the things I don't like in football.

It's not as if bar Fellaini everyone else is world class and would walk into those squads. Apart from de gea maybe martial and Pogba now nobody else would interest Barca now.
 
I have to admit I was screaming at my TV for Fellaini to get out of my team but after calming down, I realize that it could've easily happened to someone else. It was a bit rich that Jose was blaming it on the grass, though, as true as that might have been.

Mourinho was just protecting his player on TV but he probably told him in private that it was a bad mistake.
 
Van gaal Schooled Messi with vlaar and de jong. Doesn't really mean Messi isn't quality. (This isn't saying he is messi but not performing in a game means nothing)

And again, none of the teams he play for ever employ the long ball tactic. Yet he seems to play well enough for them. I am not saying he is world class but clearly comments like he is unable to play football makes me question your footballing awareness. If he wasn't able to play then why would he be consistently selected for teams by different coaches? It's not like it's one coach. It's 4 different coaches (none of whom use the style you attribute to). If he was useless, they would just not select him like they did with januzaj, Zaha and all.

What does Messi or LVG had to do with it?

Fellaini was at his very best as no 10 with Everton. They used to play a very direct football.
 
Moyes rated him, Wilmots rated him, LVG rated him and now it looks like Jose (arguably the best manager in the world) rates him.

LVG only tried to sell him in the first season and he couldn't because he picked up an injury. He turned into one of the most important members of the squad afterwards.

Ironically enough, we played our best football with Fellaini in the CAM under Van Gaal. He bagged goals against Spurs, City and Palace at the end of 14/15 which guaranteed our Champions League spot. At the end of last season, he scored goals against Everton and West Ham in the FA Cup which guaranteed our FA Cup final spot. And we would have almost definitely beaten West Ham in the league to guarantee Champions League again if Fellaini wasn't suspended. The fact that both of the goals West Ham scored in that game came from set pieces only strengthens my point.


I always cringe when people come out with statements like "How is he a professional footballer?", like they could do any better. I even heard someone once say that he's Sunday League quality... Absolute rubbish talk.

Some people don't understand the game. They we should play the same Starting 11 every game, when in reality, the best managers change it up to suit their tactics and counter their opponent. We have a squad of 30+, and like it or not, we need Fellaini in the tough physical games. Cause who do we have that's stronger? We need someone that will bully players and get stuck in. People say he concedes fouls... who cares? He's there to break up play. If conceding a foul stops an attack, then job well done. That's what he's there for.

Like I said before, people will remember this sloppy error which can easily be put down to the quality of the pitch... but they will happily forget about Smalling nearly costing us the FA Cup with his stupidity. Why is that?

Well not exactly. Moyes could have taken him earlier but he didn't. He waited right till the end to sign him up and he was more of a panic buy. LVG tried to get rid of him but the only club who wanted him was Napoli and their terms were simply ridiculous. Wilmots isn't exactly spoiled for choice in that position. I mean, Dembele and Witsel are hardly Iniesta and Scholes and its still early days for Mourinho. As said, in earlier posts our team is so unbalanced that jack of all trades tend to look better then specialists who depend on others to perform. I mean even Scholes/Pirlo would have struggled in a team that lacked someone competent in winning the ball (it doesn't really matter if its either through positioning like Carrick does, through hardwork like Butt/Gattuso did or through all round brilliance like Vidal/Keane used to do) and in a team which is so unbalanced I can see Fellaini fairing better then those two.

Regarding your second paragraph. There's no irony in Fellaini fairing better as no 10 because that is his natural role. The problem is, that to use him efficiently you have to play an extremely direct sort of football and that style is pretty obsolete at the highest level. In a deeper role he's simply not good enough at this level and with Mou signing tall players like Ibra and Pogba we won't really need a big man upfront either.

I don't think that Fellaini is shit. If I was a Sunderland manager he would be the first player I would try to buy. Its just that he's not suited for a club like ours
 
What does Messi or LVG had to do with it?

Fellaini was at his very best as no 10 with Everton. They used to play a very direct football.

He was also largely good for us in 14/15. Also wasn't he scoring for fun for Belgium during Euro qualifiers?
 
He was also largely good for us in 14/15. Also wasn't he scoring for fun for Belgium during Euro qualifiers?

I don't think that he was every really great with us. However his best games came as a no 10. Its his natural role and its were he should be playing. Unfortunately we cant play him there.

Seriously, I think that Mou will just keep him. The team is so unbalanced that we need someone who can slot all in every CM role (DM, MC, AM) and give his 100%. Having said that with Mou's strengthening the side, Fellaini's days are numbered
 
Never minded fellaini as a player, think he has plenty to offer in terms of fight and presence, and does pop up with decent goals, technically isnt bad. However he is suspect for an error or two.

My problem comes when he is used as a big target man and the ball gets lumped up to him constantly. That isn't how we are supposed to play.

I don't mind him B2B though. But there are better players for that role
 
Zlatan is a striker. Fellaini is a midfielder.

And I don't think Pogba is stronger than him. Fellaini's presence on the pitch is physically bigger and I think if you were dribbling against the two of them, Fellaini would be the harder one to come up against. He would just break up play by standing infront of you.

You asked who was stronger.... Zlatan is. End of.

Pogba is 6'3", agile, talented, athletic, fast, good in the air.... Fellaini is none of those.
 
I think he will play more matches than we expect. He won't fit into our best 11, but will come in to offset Zlatan being rested in the cups and anytime Blind is used as a CB or we play a WBA that will try to bombard us aerially. We can potentially put a lot of height out there with Zlatan/Pogba/Fellaini/Carrick/Smalling/Bailly for those banana skins at the bottom of the league that LvG had so much trouble beating.
 
Not sure about whenever it was posted here or not, saw it in the Pogba article at DM:

Jose:

'We have [Michael] Carrick - a 35-year-old man who is stable and intelligent,' he told BT Sport exclusively. 'He plays in front of the defenders which gives us all the stability and is tactially very intelligent.

'We have people like [Morgan] Schneiderlin and [Ander] Herrera also - players with experience in the Premier League but after that we have No 10s. We have [Juan] Mata, possibly [Wayne] Rooney and Henrikh Mkhitaryan.

'We don't have what I used to call the second midfield player. The one that is strong enough, powerful enough, has defensive intensity but at the same time has creativity and goals ability to drive the midfield forwards.

'We have passers, we don't have runners with the ball. So it's a profile of a player that we found.'

I know that it looks like Fellaini is staying but the muppet in me is still hopeful looking as Jose didn't mention him here (especially when you look at the description of the "second midfield player" who looks a lot like some here expected Fellaini to be)
 
I still can't believe that he is getting yet another season
 
What the hell is he meant to be? Where is his best position? Serious question. After 3 seasons, I have no idea where his ideal position would be in any formation.

He was brilliant for Everton playing up front, but I can't image how painful it would be to see him playing in an advanced position in this team.
 
What the hell is he meant to be? Where is his best position? Serious question. After 3 seasons, I have no idea where his ideal position would be in any formation.

He was brilliant for Everton playing up front, but I can't image how painful it would be to see him playing in an advanced position in this team.

His best position is in an advanced free role behind (central/left) of the striker. In my opinion his passing isn't good enough to play in a 2 man midfield we seen that last year when he played there, and his positional discipline also leaves a lot to be desired he often leaves his midfield partner exposed when playing there.

But further forward he can be very effective, and thats where he has had his best games for us i reckon.
 
What the hell is he meant to be? Where is his best position? Serious question. After 3 seasons, I have no idea where his ideal position would be in any formation.

He was brilliant for Everton playing up front, but I can't image how painful it would be to see him playing in an advanced position in this team.

For a team like United he'll always be a Plan B player to come on from the bench and ruffle some feathers in and around the opposition box and try to nick a goal in the last 15 mins.

Either that or someone to provide some height when you're defending a narrow lead against an aerial threat.

The question is whether you can achieve that with a far more useful and versatile squad player, I'd argue you could.
 
What the hell is he meant to be? Where is his best position? Serious question. After 3 seasons, I have no idea where his ideal position would be in any formation.

He was brilliant for Everton playing up front, but I can't image how painful it would be to see him playing in an advanced position in this team.
Box to box or defensive anchor.
 
Box to box or defensive anchor.
He doesn't have tactical intelligence or discipline to play as a defensive midfielder
And he lacks passing skills, agility and basic ball control ability to be effective as a b2b

His best role is clearly the one he performed in Everton in his last season there, a target-man in the number 10 position, for a team that's built around his strengths
 
He doesn't have tactical intelligence or discipline to play as a defensive midfielder
And he lacks passing skills, agility and basic ball control ability to be effective as a b2b

His best role is clearly the one he performed in Everton in his last season there, a target-man in the number 10 position, for a team that's built around his strengths
That is if you watched his 3/4 season at Everton in that role and decided that is the best role for him. He's played the majority of his career as a defensive anchor or a box to box player. (Or final third to box at Everton, the Tim Cahill role basically.) Those are his natural roles. I don't consider filling in as an attacker as part of his natural skillset. His all-round game is better suited to arriving in the box on the overload rather than setting the team up to play that way.

Groundhog day though, new season, same "doesn't even know what a football is, let alone how to play football" rhetoric. He's just yet another player to flick into the "Let Mourinho sort out what to do with him" bucket. Just yelling the same things over and over every season has become tiresome.
 
What the hell is he meant to be? Where is his best position? Serious question. After 3 seasons, I have no idea where his ideal position would be in any formation.

He was brilliant for Everton playing up front, but I can't image how painful it would be to see him playing in an advanced position in this team.
As far as United is concerned, nothing of note. "plan B" is probably the worst answer of all. Maybe some he can be useful somewhere else.
 
That is if you watched his 3/4 season at Everton in that role and decided that is the best role for him. He's played the majority of his career as a defensive anchor or a box to box player
Yes, and he played for a midtable team without any real success - until his breakthrough season as a n.10, of course.
For us the only time when he resembled an actual footballer (to be fair to him it was more than that, he played really well at the time) was when he played as a leftish attacking midfielder in 4-3-3, being a target man for our team and helping us to break up the opposition's pressing game by passing it long to him
 
His best position is in an advanced free role behind (central/left) of the striker. In my opinion his passing isn't good enough to play in a 2 man midfield we seen that last year when he played there, and his positional discipline also leaves a lot to be desired he often leaves his midfield partner exposed when playing there.

But further forward he can be very effective, and thats where he has had his best games for us i reckon.
I honestly don't think he has the skillset that is suited for any position or role on a football field, certainly not for a team that aspires to be amongst the best in the world. "Plan B", as some people have said, is the only useful option I can see him as at United. It's a shame, because I'm actually quite fond of his personality on the pitch. He's a dirty, no-nonsense bastard, who'll get stuck in; something we have missed for a while, and something you need in a successful team.
 
I honestly don't think he has the skillset that is suited for any position or role on a football field, certainly not for a team that aspires to be amongst the best in the world. "Plan B", as some people have said, is the only useful option I can see him as at United. It's a shame, because I'm actually quite fond of his personality on the pitch. He's a dirty, no-nonsense bastard, who'll get stuck in; something we have missed for a while, and something you need in a successful team.

Not as a starter no i'd agree, and thats basically why he needs a free role as he's not good enough as a central midfielder. As a squad player for certain situations he has his uses though.
 
Bournemouth 1:3 Man Utd
Defensively he's been solid so far and in the Leicester game much to the despair of many no doubt.
 
I'm not going to say anything about his performance so far. Last time I got ready to praise him, he played that beautiful through ball to Vardy
 
Defensively solid and has dealt with all their crosses in the box so far. Good stuff.
 
Doing pretty well so far, and his interventions in our own box show why Mourinho is picking him.
 
Plays himself into the team both offensively and defensively....keeps it simple too.
 
Our best player, in my opinion. Defensively fantastic. As I said, dont be surprised to see Fellaini with Pogba.
Was thinking the same. He cleared all the crosses into the box in the last few minutes. Will be an asset on both ends of the pitch.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.