Di Maria's angel
Captain of Moanchester United
On the pitch, I meant.
Who cares?
On the pitch, I meant.
I'm not trying to hold him to a higher standard though; just that of what I think we need in a player. And I'm pointing out that while his work ethic is unquestionable, the manner in which he plays football leads to some very notable deficiencies in his game.
I doubt either of you would have the same view if it was a player you liked.
Out of interest, are you English/British? The reason I ask is it seems to mostly be a British trait to see passion and physicality going hand in hand. Obviously there's a balance between stupidly and physicality, but I think Fellaini walked the right side of the line today. I read before the game that he's only been sent off twice in the PL, so I think he knows how to walk that line.It;s nothing to do with players I like or don't like. I don't think football should be played which such barbaric attitude whether he plays for United or not. It seems very English to define aggression as getting stuck to let your opponent know you are around. This is wrong football. Football should be played from your brain to your legs not just heart to legs. For this reason I did not like Rooney when he had his supposedly "red mist" or "fire in the belly" moments. It is a poor excuse for a footballer not to control their aggression on the pitch. You would hardly see players more passionate than Maldini for Milan but he wasn't an animal, was he? I do a bit of coaching for young people and I will not be asking them to be physical on a player. What are we going to teach them next? How to use your elbows efficiently? This is why Rooney can not stand with the likes of Iniesta, Lahm and other top players. Fire in your belly is not the licence to be physical but to creative.
So whether it is Fellaini or Joey Barton or Pepe or Costa or Cattermole it should not be celebrated. We pay to watch intelligent footballers not animals.
I personally enjoy slating him but in all honesty he gives the team something different. Might not look classy or spectacular but offers variation and that's something this team needs.
The onus is down to rest to compliment what he offers well, little things like going for the second ball and not burdening him with creative passing responsibilities.
Anyone who doesn't want the players representing their club to act over-aggressively or be prone to thuggish behaviour.Who cares?
Anyone who doesn't want the players representing their club to act over-aggressively or be prone to thuggish behaviour.
Things like tackling is too late for him to master, one of the reason Moyes stopped using him in a deep role because he always left the team exposed thru late challenges or losing the ball cheaply.Or pretty much any other responsibilities at all
Not by birth no but I learnt some football from the continent and have had coaches that played around the world. I suffered the same fate when I moved to England as a kid. A crunching tackle was more celebrated than a quick succession of one touch passes. I have always been though that aggression is a mental state of mind rather than a physical interpretation. I had to learn to win the ball with minimal contact with the opposition player by reading the movement of the ball (speed and spin) ,anticipation of the player, spatial awareness (open spaces and occupied spaces). It seems a lot but these are the things that make footballers intelligent, by using their heads.Out of interest, are you English/British? The reason I ask is it seems to mostly be a British trait to see passion and physicality going hand in hand. Obviously there's a balance between stupidly and physicality, but I think Fellaini walked the right side of the line today. I read before the game that he's only been sent off twice in the PL, so I think he knows how to walk that line.
So more like rolling subs? Bring him on when we have a set piece and take him off straight away? I'd like that!We scored when he finally decided to jump and realise he can win a header that way. TBH, I think thats what he should be used for, set pieces near the end to cause trouble, not starting as a DM...
It;s nothing to do with players I like or don't like. I don't think football should be played which such barbaric attitude whether he plays for United or not. It seems very English to define aggression as getting stuck to let your opponent know you are around. This is wrong football. Football should be played from your brain to your legs not just heart to legs. For this reason I did not like Rooney when he had his supposedly "red mist" or "fire in the belly" moments. It is a poor excuse for a footballer not to control their aggression on the pitch. You would hardly see players more passionate than Maldini for Milan but he wasn't an animal, was he? I do a bit of coaching for young people and I will not be asking them to be physical on a player. What are we going to teach them next? How to use your elbows efficiently? This is why Rooney can not stand with the likes of Iniesta, Lahm and other top players. Fire in your belly is not the licence to be physical but to creative.
So whether it is Fellaini or Joey Barton or Pepe or Costa or Cattermole it should not be celebrated. We pay to watch intelligent footballers not animals.
Good lord. I hate this hipster nonsense about right football and wrong football. But then again, you think Fellaini wouldn't even get in most Championship teams so you clearly have no idea what you're talking about.
Don't need to make up how well he's performed against United whilst at Everton. I suggest you go watch some footage. Or quit being a troll.
Anyone who doesn't want the players representing their club to act over-aggressively or be prone to thuggish behaviour.
So have most of his teammates during the tenure of his spell here.Presumably because that "dry spell" has been for the majority of his career here.
You arent the first to say that.Cant see him staying beyond the summer.
Yeah, that sums it up pretty well. Probably his best performance this season.He really is a prick, putting his head in on Lucas (after stepping on his foot), claiming a non-existent handball penalty, and just generally marauding round the place being a twat, but he was comfortably our best midfielder today and instrumental in the winning goal.
Eh, not sure I agree with that. Mata and Memphis can be invisible, sure. But Morgan and Herrera are both grafters -- they do as much, probably more, defensive work than Fellaini does. The latter is more noticeable only because of his tendency to get involved in silly scuffles. Strong performance today, though.Conversely players like Herrera, Mata, Memphis and Schneiderlin can be completely invisible if they are having a bad game or even if it's just that the team overall is playing poorly. Essentially I think their minimum performance level is a lot lower than Fellainis and that that is important to LVG, and also why Fellaini does not tend to get subbed off often.
De Gea made one save, if I remember correctly (feel free to correct me on this). And that, too, was a standard save.
De Gea made one save, if I remember correctly (feel free to correct me on this). And that, too, was a standard save.
Love the reluctance. Some people seriously must be gutted