lem8sh
New Member
Saying he improved in the second half cannot be used as a compliment, we could have brought on Doris the tealady and she would have been an improvement on that first half.
If Fellaini played in Spain he'd get sent off every game. Ramos is a saint compared to this thug.You'd make a Rolls Royce on Ramos.
That's not the point you can't justify a really poor game by saying he did a couple of good things, tackles and interceptions are important but I would be worried if a DM or defender didn't make any and it's nothing to get excited about if the rest of their performance is rubbish. Your clutching at straws.
If Fellaini played in Spain he'd get sent off every game. Ramos is a saint compared to this thug.
He will playAbsolute dog shit performance. He won't play Sunday
Showing for the ball doesn't explain his inability to make simple five yard passes under no pressure. Technically he's poor and being closed down affects him but tonight he was sloppy even when not under any considerable pressure.Now how is this for a really controversial theory:
In the first half, Fellaini ended up looking so bad because he was one of the only ones really showing for the ball, and thus when he HAD the ball he had no real options.
And no, this isnt me trying to deflect the blame for a poor performance, but merely a theory owing to the fact that in the first half the likes of Mata and Rooney were completely anonymous - Fellaini seemed to get quite a bit of the ball (and lost it a lot of the time) so he was obviously getting into positions where he could receive it - if other players were doing the same and giving him some easy options for the passes, maybe he would have done better?
Now how is this for a really controversial theory:
In the first half, Fellaini ended up looking so bad because he was one of the only ones really showing for the ball, and thus when he HAD the ball he had no real options.
And no, this isnt me trying to deflect the blame for a poor performance, but merely a theory owing to the fact that in the first half the likes of Mata and Rooney were completely anonymous - Fellaini seemed to get quite a bit of the ball (and lost it a lot of the time) so he was obviously getting into positions where he could receive it - if other players were doing the same and giving him some easy options for the passes, maybe he would have done better?
maybe the least creative player in the league, and when he can't do the simple things he's useless.
Showing for the ball doesn't explain his inability to make simple five yard passes under no pressure. Technically he's poor and being closed down affects him but tonight he was sloppy even when not under any considerable pressure.
Thought he came out fighting in the second half and even though it wasn't as good as his recent performances he was better.
Under pressure his size helps him to shield the ball but in my opinion he's just not a top level midfielder and never will be. Technically he's ridiculously lacking.I agree he was sloppy and gave the ball away too much, but I have to say he is normally pretty good at retaining the ball under pressure - that has been one of his key strengths so far this season for me.
Now how is this for a really controversial theory:
In the first half, Fellaini ended up looking so bad because he was one of the only ones really showing for the ball, and thus when he HAD the ball he had no real options.
And no, this isnt me trying to deflect the blame for a poor performance, but merely a theory owing to the fact that in the first half the likes of Mata and Rooney were completely anonymous - Fellaini seemed to get quite a bit of the ball (and lost it a lot of the time) so he was obviously getting into positions where he could receive it - if other players were doing the same and giving him some easy options for the passes, maybe he would have done better?
Nice theory, partially it sounds about right because he's made more passes than Carrick today ( with not all that bad completion, probably made up for it in the second half, ended up with 84% success rate ) but the latter was sent to defence. But hey, we're playing it from the back and for that reason Michael was moved to that 3-men-pile-of-shit.
Match to forget really. I blame the 352 for everybody's inability today.
I hadn't thought of it this way, but your post makes sense to me, and you're right, he didn't shy away from the ball as too many of his teammates did.Now how is this for a really controversial theory:
In the first half, Fellaini ended up looking so bad because he was one of the only ones really showing for the ball, and thus when he HAD the ball he had no real options.
And no, this isnt me trying to deflect the blame for a poor performance, but merely a theory owing to the fact that in the first half the likes of Mata and Rooney were completely anonymous - Fellaini seemed to get quite a bit of the ball (and lost it a lot of the time) so he was obviously getting into positions where he could receive it - if other players were doing the same and giving him some easy options for the passes, maybe he would have done better?
Its not really a criticism. It isn't his game to be creative. He doesn't make incisive passes or clever dribbles. He usually does the messy stuff and the fundamental stuff right. When he doesn't do it though, he doesn't offer anything.Aaaaaand you're getting silly now.
My post was meant to be tongue-in-cheek and I blame LVG for tonights performance as I have said in several threads, but 84% completion isnt actually that bad, especially considering how bad he and the entire team were in the first half.
Under pressure his size helps him to shield the ball but in my opinion he's just not a top level midfielder and never will be. Technically he's ridiculously lacking.
I hadn't thought of it this way, but your post makes sense to me, and you're right, he didn't shy away from the ball as too many of his teammates did.
I wouldn't use my support as evidence of your sanity if I were you.So I havent gone completely mad then, that is good.
I wouldn't use my support as evidence of your sanity if I were you.
hold your horses.Today, the shit Fellaini turned up as opposed to the dominating all-round behemoth we've been witnessing over the past few games.
He was in Wanyama's pocket all night long, and it was one of those nights where he could've even been outjumped in the air by a three foot hobbit.