Actually, many people have degraded his capabilities in midfield - sometimes to further their agenda. My problem with these claims is that they're mostly founded on Fellaini producing a good season in 12/13 behind the striker. And so, everyone seems
His abilities clearly aren't up to par for a first team midfielder at the highest level. His skill set is better suited to a role where he doesn't need to think very much.
Had Fellaini never played behind the striker he wouldn't have been such a 'big' name clearly. He was largely mediocre in midfielder - at around the Mulumbu or Yacob level. Let's not pretend that he was incredible in midfield before moving further forward.
I don't understand this point. Are you trying to downplay the performance? Fellaini produced a very good performance against Norwich, under Roberto Martínez. Either I'm completely stupid or he seen something in him to play him in that type of role. One of my points being that I rate him as a defensive midfielder, rather than a box-to-box midfielder.
Well if saying that it's nothing more than a tidy performance that two dozen midfielders in the league could match, and another dozen could surpass in that same role in that same team in the same game is considered 'downplaying the performance' then yes.
A quick look at Everton's bench that day and there's your main answer to why he played - not a centre-midfielder listed. He was the best they had available, they didn't have McCarthy or Barry at that point, and Martinez was in the middle of telling the world that Fellaini wasn't coming to United. He wasn't going to call up a kid from the reserves.
He had quite a few in 11/12. To reiterate, Moyes used him behind the striker because Everton lacked a good striker. Moyes then played him in midfield for us because we have one world class striker (Van Persie) and Rooney for the SS position. At Everton, Martínez changed the system and moved Fellaini into his best position - and that resulted to a couple of good performances at the start of the season for Fellaini. It's one of the reasons why I have a little bit of hope that he'll come good for us next season. Under circumstances where we are looking for a goal to equalise or win a game, then that's when we should utilise the tactic you mentioned. However, people need to stop acting as if he's a one-dimensional player because he isn't.
Moyes used him behind the striker (the reasons for this are irrelevant) and he looked much more at home. Yes he's had some good performances in midfield in his time in England, but not as many or as impressive as the performances in second striker (and it
is possible to be as impressive playing there).
His 'good' performances (such as the one versus Norwich) are so basic that so many players in the league could match it or do better.
People aren't saying he's one-dimensional. He can do other things, it's just that the other things he can do aren't noteworthy and aren't things that Fulham or Sunderland's midfielders can't do just as well.
He's not great at any one thing other than being a target man really. He's not a great tackler (Mulumbu and Yacob are better), he doesn't pass beyond the easy passes (even then he often needs a few touches or just slows the play down), his reading of the game is extremely poor for a defensive midfielder.
It's not that he can't be played in a proper midfield role (one that requires quick and secure passing, good reading, good tackling and just general quick thinking) it's that he wouldn't do a very good job consistently.
That's not a question for me to answer. It's up to Van Gaal on how he approaches these sort of games. For clarification, I don't think Fellaini is a very good/quality player, but I do think he's a good player that can show more than last season.
He's shown nothing to suggest he can do the business in any kind of tricky game.
Van Gaal may well get something out of him, but it'll almost certainly be in a role where the quick-thinking most top midfielders display is unnecessary.
The thinking part of football, the knowledge of where to stand and move to, who to pass to when given the options - those are things that no manager can teach a 26/27 year old. Any role that requires that, Fellaini will look below what other top clubs have. His best role in midfield will probably be replicating his number 10 "make your presence felt" role in a deeper position and putting himself about. Because the passing and tackling and shooting is nothing that you can't get from a Sunderland or West Ham midfielder.
I was referring to his work rate with us. Fellaini, without any doubt, was the least-hardest worker in our team last season. It's not acceptable to leave strikers in the box or to chase reluctantly after the ball. What's ironic is that he was poor defensively against Manchester City (A) and then even worse at home against them. He didn't apply himself fully and that's incredibly disappointing. By default, Fellaini is a hard-working player. He does very well to mark players and that's what you expect to see. In the game against Russia today, there was a bit of play where he marked one of the Russian players and looked eager to not lose him. That's the opposite to the eagerness he displayed last season. If he wants to start appeasing our fans, then he needs to show that consistently for us.
We'll have to agree to disagree here. For me he's definitely not afraid to work hard. The problem is he hasn't a clue what to do half the time. His old role required little football brain. He basically challenged for everything, flicked it on, made a nuisance of himself, and occasionally chested it and passed it five yards. He's now deeper and required to think about the ball coming to him. He can't just flick it on like he could as a second striker, he actually has to keep possession. And the only way he can do that is by taking four slow touches half the time.
Off the ball he's often clueless, so he just jogs about trying not to overcommit or run about aimlessly.
He sometimes completely chooses not to bother, but most of the time it genuinely seems like he's just oblivious to what's going on. He's often behind the play. Part of defending well is being aware of where the pass could go and anticipating the opposition. Fellaini lacks that. He jogs about thinking (hoping) he's covering the space, but he has no clue.
He may well have been solely a midfielder before, but he's not even showing the midfield skill set or natural ability of Alex Song or Gareth Barry. Both of whom few would have welcomed here. He made his name as a second striker for a reason.
Having said all of this though, he's better than what he showed last season. And the midfielders he played beside were often as clueless as he was (for different reasons). In a team less disjointed and with him hopefully playing with less fear, as he did last year, he should look quite a bit better. But I still don't see the technique and awareness in him that a first-team midfielder would need here. And those things are usually developed pretty early on.