A lot of what you’ve said here comes down to personal ideology, it seems from the tone of your points that you prefer government to be running things. As far as I’m concerned, governments are generally incapable of running anything, I wouldn’t trust politicians of any ilk to run so much as a car boot sale, I’m happier when they are not involved at all.
I can’t say this for certain but from what I understand Thatchers idea was to transfer large chunks of state run affairs to the people by privatization because the UK was on the verge of bankruptcy. The move was designed to encourage entrepreneurial spirit, because certain aspects of that may not have worked just means they have been poorly managed - thats nothing to do with her, there are few if any economists who are receptive to the idea of state run institutions. Privately run companies without gov subsidy have higher degrees of accountability, they need to balance the books and to be accountable to stock holders - in theory this results in a better product. As far as I’m concerned the fewer pies a gov has its fingers the better, and the less money it needs to take from us in the form of taxes to run them. Its beyond me why people want the gov to provide for them, my personal ideology is, the gov can feck right off, I’ll provide for myself thanks I realize of course there are exceptions to this, like children and people with disabilities and the elderly etc but every other fit healthy person of working age should have more personal responsibility, the number of people I know in Belfast who say “it doesn’t pay me to work” is staggering, I can’t even wrap my head around this concept, but our culture has bred this though the expectations of being taken care of by another.
I don’t see what you mean by what didn’t work about the "right to buy scheme".... off the top of my head without researching I understand that approx 70% of UK were living in council housing at that time, you can’t say that was a good thing? I myself took advantage of “right to buy” and so did my parents because it was so cheap to do so, they paid off their mortgage in less than 10 years. My mum sold her "right to buy house" just before the economic collapse 3 years ago luckily enough and moved in with her sister who also bough her right to buy house, I don’t even want to say how much she made from this transaction, but lets just say I will never have to worry about her financially and neither will my aunt and more importantly neither will the government, which means neither will you.... how is this bad, had Thatcher not introduced that scheme she most likely would have been living in gov subsidy for the rest of her life with no money like all the generations before her. My mums career was as a check out girl and my dad worked as a salesman... both low income and now she has 10s of thousands sitting in the bank, she even has investments ffs.... this was unheard of before for low income working class folks and I’m pretty certain she’s not the only pensioner sitting in this position... how is this bad?
Thatcher didn’t ruin health care, social medicine is dying because it doesn’t work, why do you think you pay so much for petrol or alcohol or all the other things you pay through the nose for..... the answer is because of the tax needed to prop up the system the social system, people think its free.... fecking sure its not. I pay an actual policy of $250 a month for mine but I’m pretty certain I pay less than you do for yours in the grand scheme of things
ratic