No mate, nobody in contract can be forced to sign for someone else. That situation doesn't exist post Bosman. A player might conceivably demand his contract paid in exchange for leaving the club but that's far from the norm.If the club sell Rashford and he hasn't made a formal transfer request, they have to pay up his contract. Assuming Italian law is the same Atalanta would've paid Hojlund's off when he left.
How does it work then? I suppose the Rashford and Hojlund situations are different in that Rashford's wages are probably going to be lower so he would expect the difference?No mate, nobody in contract can be forced to sign for someone else. That situation doesn't exist post Bosman. A player might conceivably demand his contract paid in exchange for leaving the club but that's far from the norm.
He did but he didn't specifiy what it was, for all we know that challenge might just be challenge to look like a footballer!Didn't he say he wanted a new challenge? Get on it mate
there is. the worst trainer has to wear their mum’s dressing gown in public.
Nope, that's not how transfers workIf the club sell Rashford and he hasn't made a formal transfer request, they have to pay up his contract. Assuming Italian law is the same Atalanta would've paid Hojlund's off when he left.
Got it, so I'm assuming Rashford would want the money made up is he agrees to leave for a lower wage.Nope, that's not how transfers work
A club can only sell a player if said player agrees to all the terms, whether or not he asked for a transfer is irrrelevant, existing contracts are not automatically paid out
Rosa Diaz said it best, should always have an axe handy.I carry an axe in my car
He might, but he might not get it.Got it, so I'm assuming Rashford would want the money made up is he agrees to leave for a lower wage.
Right but if he doesn't he can refuse to leave.He might, but he might not get it.
Sure. But he went on record to say that he was ready for a new challenge, so I would presume that he is willing to do his part to get his wish?Right but if he doesn't he can refuse to leave.
Didn’t know who that was at first, so I searched her name on Google ImagesRosa Diaz said it best, should always have an axe handy.
You are mistaken.If the club sell Rashford and he hasn't made a formal transfer request, they have to pay up his contract. Assuming Italian law is the same Atalanta would've paid Hojlund's off when he left.
Yep, I was wrong, it's been cleared up earlier. The outcome seems that Rashford has to agree to leave if the club sell him so he may want any difference in salary made up.You are mistaken.
Did Leicester pay up Harry Maguires contract?
Did Crystal Palace pay up Wan Bisakkas contract?
A player is only entitled to be paid for the period of the contract they are at the club. Also for your information the laws around this do not differ in any country in Europe
You are confusing a transfer with a situation where the player is refusing to leave (mainly because they are being forced out) and the club may come to some mutual agreement to either terminate the contract or pay them an incentive to accept the move.
Once you transfer and sign a contract with a new club your previous contract is terminated on said date and you are owed no monies beyond what was contractually obligated on said date (which includes any loyalty bonuses etc) maybe this is what you are referring to?
The decent agents guide & ground as you say. He is reped by novices.Oh no doubt about that
A good agent will manage his clinets expectations not just the clubs, I can't imagine that's easy to do for your own brother
For the club and player to clearly be wiling to get a deal done and yet it's seemingly struggled to get past initial enquiries tells me someone is refusing to negotiate
More than likely, or at least a proportion of it, pretty much any other player would do the same - the real issue is that he was given a contract like in the first placeGot it, so I'm assuming Rashford would want the money made up is he agrees to leave for a lower wage.
Unfortunately he'll probably be one of those players who at 40 is potless, the hangers on will be long gone, and he'll be wishing he'd not thrown it all away in his mid 20s.Remember all the people who insisted that him fecking off to New York dressed like that in the middle of the biggest crisis of our club's modern history was not indicative of a problem with his attitude?
Yes but he’s also said that he’s ready for a new challenge. So that could be framed more mutual than being one sided pushed so there could also be a compromise on the payout imo. Or he can stay and not have his wish.More than likely, or at least a proportion of it, pretty much any other player would do the same - the real issue is that he was given a contract like in the first place
Thanks for clearing it up.More than likely, or at least a proportion of it, pretty much any other player would do the same - the real issue is that he was given a contract like in the first place
Not suggesting there's no room for compromise, that's why I said a proportion, ulimately this will be his decisionYes but he’s also said that he’s ready for a new challenge. So that could be framed more mutual than being one sided pushed so there could also be a compromise on the payout imo. Or he can stay and not have his wish.
Maybe they want someone who gives a feck?I'm amazed he's not going to Spurs or Arsenal even on loan they could both use him, he'd love the London life
Tbf I think he has been quite respectful to both Amorim and the club since being frozen out. And I'd lump Casemiro in with that as well. Neither have said anything negative about either the management or the club.
Indeed.Yep, I was wrong, it's been cleared up earlier. The outcome seems that Rashford has to agree to leave if the club sell him so he may want any difference in salary made up.
Tell that to Ronaldo or Sancho.It's the bare minimum you'd expect from a professional footballer earning £250+ a week.
It was a top post Simon. The only thing that’s more surprising is that there are actually some who might feel different about this whole situation!Really appreciate the kind words, thank you chaps. More importantly, it always encouraging to flush out the like minded people on here. So, thanks again.
Tell that to Ronaldo or Sancho.
I don't get why most footballers can't dress better. They've got the money to get personal shoppers and stylists but choose to dress in garish tacky stuff like this.
Because as said by Neville and Rooney there, he's not a bad trainer. Most of the time at least. It's pretty much his life outside football.If he is that bad of a trainer, how is it that he is not removed from training or made to train with the reserves? I don't get it.
How does how a person dresses reflect their attitude? You see the most ridiculous things being worn by athletes regularly. It's a nonsense argument and potentially racially tinged.Remember all the people who insisted that him fecking off to New York dressed like that in the middle of the biggest crisis of our club's modern history was not indicative of a problem with his attitude?
How does how a person dresses reflect their attitude? You see the most ridiculous things being worn by athletes regularly. It's a nonsense argument and potentially racially tinged.
Or it didn’tWell it clearly did reflect his attitude, so case closed.
When and where did this happen?So Rashford has apparently said that he is not prepared to take a salary reduction…..
Therefore the managers comments today giving him a way back makes sense as he’s obviously been told we aren’t giving him away on loan and paying for it.
Be interesting to see how this plays out the next few days….will definitely tell us a lot about the new leadership.
More like he owes us for all the times he hasn't been arsed to play properly.Not comfortable with the “he should take a pay cut” angle. The club ow him.