Involved in all 3 goals, but can't make decisions?
Goal involvements are not just that the attacker is doing something right, it is always if a defender did something wrong. The dribble attempts by Rashford certainly were good and I am glad, they turned out in goals, but from my point of view, when he receives the ball, he too often is looking for a superstar moment. He isn't as good as a dribbler as he thinks he is, he doesn't have the close control to dribble at speed that close to the byline.
I think, he is stagnating as a player. Don't know if it is only me but it kind of feels like, he thinks that he is good enough to behave like Ronaldo or Messi or even Mbappe on the pitch. And I just don't think, he has their quality as a player. Granted, he definitely played way better at LW yesterday than the matches before and maybe he will start to think more if there is another attacker to actually create for.
He was involved in all 3 goals. I find it so bizarre that rather than focus on the positive the majority in this thread come out with the negative. Antony tracked back today and pressed okay but not much else, he didn’t have any assists or goals but Rashford is singled out as the ‘problem’.
There were moments in yesterdays game where Rashford was back at left back winning the ball but they’re overlook in favour of showing a clip of him failing at something.
Such a weird mentality.
Nothing bizarre about it. If you want to focus only on the positives, you're free to do it. But three moments with an actual output in a match that lasted 111 minutes against a relegation candidate isn't really world class stuff. If it is for you, thats fine but lets stop calling peoples opinions bizarre.
I am not sure what constitutes a "weird" mentality since it is a subjective concept but I am pretty sure that the snowflake "mentally weak" "be content with mediocrity" "mercenary" culture has plagued our team in the last few years and that is why we have fallen behind so much, and we have a fanbase (perhaps you included) that is too lenient and indulging, giving our players and the board a almost free pass.
Rashford just had a decent performance yesterday, you won't deny that his performance was not worldclass right? What is the problem of asking your key attacking player to improve? What is the use of "focusing on the positive"? You think that Rashford hasn't got enough praise and appreciation already in his life? Obviously it is the other way round.
Our players are spoiled, stop spoiling them if you want our team to progress.
Well said.
I appreciate Rashford as a player and I think, he is a very talented player and seemingly a good person. And I am sure, playing at LW instead of ST will help him to play better. And having Hojlund as somebody who it makes sense to create for maybe will bring out the best of him. I really hope though, that as a player he continues to develop because I sometimes get the feeling he thinks he is already at a point where he only has to be him to justify his place.