Regulus Arcturus Black
Full Member
...moved on and replaced by better players, in key positions, enabled by proper recruitment and reward, and developed under a much better coaching and playing set-up. That's almost certainly a new manager, 3-4 years, and more money.
I think we’ve so many dogshit players we should care about removing than one who is currently hitting some actual form (2 goals, 2 assists in his last 4), and who just last season had 41 goal contributions in 56 games.
Like a full back who can never stay fit and has been that way since he joined us from Southampton almost a decade ago, a goalkeeper much like the last who costs us too many goals, some absolutely terrible centre backs, two right backs not fit for a top club. No single central midfielder who can control a game, the other none-Rashford wingers who barely contribute to goals or assists and no striker of note who’ll even get double figures.
And a manager who is massively failing his players and the club.
That’s me though.
Last year with a functioning side, you see what Rashford can do. What we should be aiming for is a side that can function for more than one season. We clearly need a full back or two, a central midfielder or two and a proven striker in his prime that guarantees goals.
If we get that and Rashford and/or whoever cannot perform, we should absolutely move them on, though my bet is, the likes of Bruno & Rashford will look much better when alongside better players who give them better options and share the creative burden.
It’s no surprise Rashford’s best seasons aside from last were with an in-form Martial and then with Cavani.
Last edited: