I disagree.
First of all, I don't think we should be prioritizing Ugarte and looking for his ideal partner in midfield. It should be Mainoo we're doing that for.
Secondly, Ugarte committing to too many duels is a problem in itself, like I mentioned previously.
Finally, I love how the ability to cover big spaces is being looked over in every reply I receive in this thread. Ugarte will never be a big spaces player. That alone means he shouldn't be thought of as one of the players we are building the team around. Mainoo isn't that player either. Whoever we get as our next number 8 signing, likely won't be that player either. So if our starting #6 cannot do it either, then the only way to avoid getting hit on opposition transitions is to set up against everyone the same way we set up against Arsenal and City. Even against the likes of Southampton or Wolves.
Well, I don't think Gary Neville was an average player at all.
Also, do you realize I wanted Sander Berge instead of Ugarte, who fits the bill of a water carrier much more than the Uruguayan does, based on what his price would've been, their careers so far, and fan perception as well?
You don't need to tell me we can't have a squad of 25 world class players and that players like O'Shea, Park, Welbeck, etc. can be very important for a world class squad. I'm usually the one telling this to others.
Regarding Ugarte, my point is more about the financial outlay, and how we complicated the midfield rebuild with his signing.
You can find players on the market on the cheap, that can't have a long term key role, but can still raise the physical levels of the squad and cover big spaces quickly, if needed. Berge might be the best example of this, from all the players that changed clubs this summer. He would've been a starter for us for 1 season. 2 at most. But he possesses some crucial traits that Ugarte doesn't, and would've been easier to phase out of the XI too.