Wednesday at Stoke
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2014
- Messages
- 22,242
- Supports
- Time Travel
Martial you lazy pissant!
Where's Tony???
Keep up with the rules changes. VAR got it right.Sorry but he hasn't moved his arm towards the ball, it's at his side, what is he supposed to do about it? We're so lucky with these VAR decisions lately
Only time they can be sure he won't shoot?Why fred taking corners?
It's the reason he will struggle to hit 20 every season. That was bread and butter for a striker.Where's Tony???
Martial is no striker
Of course I wouldn’t prefer a player to be hurt, hut damn mate there’s a long way between one and the other.A
So, if you’re going to answer my question you prefer that the player doesn’t go down, stands his ground and kicks the keeper in the head with his stride?
It’s a fair point, but one I disagree with.
Doesn't matter. Any hand/arm ball in attack is automatically disallowed. Correct decision.Sorry but he hasn't moved his arm towards the ball, it's at his side, what is he supposed to do about it? We're so lucky with these VAR decisions lately
At least it’s across the board. If ball touches arm it’s no goal.Sorry but he hasn't moved his arm towards the ball, it's at his side, what is he supposed to do about it? We're so lucky with these VAR decisions lately
Fernandes flicked it on.Lindelof very lucky. Ducked under the ball and we're lucky it's still 1-0 to us.
Not for a lack of trying probablyOnly time they can be sure he won't shoot?
Any touch on the arm that results in a goal scored, is disallowed. Rules are different in attack vs defence. That's just how the rules are nowadays.Sorry but he hasn't moved his arm towards the ball, it's at his side, what is he supposed to do about it? We're so lucky with these VAR decisions lately
You think ? 3 goals in 2 matches disallowed !!That will be Pool.
He doesn't get any service ffs. Team didn't create any chance for him. He is top strikerMartial is no striker
Martin Atkinson