Moriarty
Full Member
Madrid sorted their midfield in minutes, but we are still struggling in this position years after.
Aye, and with a player who, not long ago, would have been wearing red last night and not white.
Madrid sorted their midfield in minutes, but we are still struggling in this position years after.
You mean greenAye, and with a player who, not long ago, would have been wearing red last night and not white.
You’re worried after a couple pre season friendlies that casemiro isn’t looking sharp?
You mean green
TBH the expectation I had before that match was for Real Madrid to have a handful of more shots on goal and on target than United and for them to boss possession and be a lot more accurate than United in their passing.
The match stats
Shots at goal - 15 each
on target shots - 5 each
Possession 53% to 47% in favour of United
Total passes 575 to 510 in favour of United
Passing accuracy United 89% and Madrid 87%
Those stats points to positive signs in what was a decent work out.
in first half we were second best in offside goals too.The first half stats would be more revealing and I'm sure they would show we were second best in every category.
I completely agree, didn’t get to see it but I heard Bissaka also looks like a new player.It really is exciting to see quality players in every position and then knowing you have quality depth on the bench too.
Add Hojlund and Amrabat to this squad and we’ve got some great options.
The first half stats had them a few shots ahead but even on possession and actual chances were even. We just missed them, they scored theirs in probably an offside goal.The first half stats would be more revealing and I'm sure they would show we were second best in every category.
in first half we were second best in offside goals too.
Not sure what you're expecting from Onana to be honest. You thought he will single-handedly transform our attack?
On the bolded part, in the end it matters how many goals he let's in compared to what is expected. De Gea did no better than average keeper, so the bar isn't exactly high for Onana. He might not be a great shotstopper and still can be a significant upgrade on De Gea of last few seasons.
It's Madrid, they can sign whoever they want.Madrid sorted their midfield in minutes, but we are still struggling in this position years after.
There's is 24 minute highlights on the Man Utd app.Didn't watch this because I value my sleep. Could someone give me the rundown? How were Mount and Onana? Antony and Casemiro?
You call this "insanity" yet you made a comment about Onana first 90' in United shirt and in meaningless pre-season game that "nothing about Onana’s performance last night that looked anything like a transformation in our attack". This is the standard you will be following now, because some crazy people (I have never seen those comments so that must be like 1% of the caf) mentioned this regarding De Gea? I think you should let it go.Not sure what you're expecting from Onana to be honest. You thought he will single-handedly transform our attack? Not I, but there are many among us here who literally -- and I literally mean literally --blamed De Gea for our poor performance in attack last season (yes, including our weak chance conversion, as crazy as that sounds) and that Onana would transform -- yes, transform -- our attack. I do not agree with this insanity.
I probably agree about that comment. We should know better by know not to focus on one attribute of a goalkeeper, because once this declines there's not much else left. So I will be happy with all-round keeper even if he doesn't make a few supersaves a season. Plus I really value a GK who knows how to command the box, time will tell if Onana can do it.As for the second point, the word "average" has become meaningless. What is undeniable is that Dave made too many mistakes that a United keeper cannot be allowed to make. He was still making saves that your "average" keeper could never make, but when you see him fail to stop Benrahma's shot what you're seeing a lack of concentration (not ability) and that's something that the manager can't tolerate. Dave set a very high bar that Onana is unlikely to ever meet, but if he can make sure that a shot like Benrahma's will never get past him he'll be a worthy successor to De Gea, though one who is unlikely to perform at the highest level Dave was at for years.
Madrid sorted their midfield in minutes, but we are still struggling in this position years after.
No one was sharp and he was playing centre midfield on his ownHe wasn't sharp the last month or so last season. He is 31 and that's the age where most athletes lose a half of step for quickness. Then it becomes a full step. I'm worried and I hope I'm wrong!
Yeah I watched the whole match except last 10 mins. There were a lot of positives to take from it despite some of the meltdowns here.I completely agree, didn’t get to see it but I heard Bissaka also looks like a new player.
Did you get to watch- what did you think? I’m happy a double pivot was the plan, that’s why I was crying for caicedo becuase Casemiro is strong pushing the ball forward and I thought the two of them would shut down basically any midfield out there, with Mount and Fernandes further up
First half statsThe first half stats would be more revealing and I'm sure they would show we were second best in every category.
First half stats
Possession 51% to 49% in favour of United.
Total passes United 295, Madrid 286
Passing accuracy United 89% and Madrid 88%
Shots on goal 7-5 in favour of Madrid
Shots on target 2-1 in favour of Madrid
You call this "insanity" yet you made a comment about Onana first 90' in United shirt and in meaningless pre-season game that "nothing about Onana’s performance last night that looked anything like a transformation in our attack". This is the standard you will be following now, because some crazy people (I have never seen those comments so that must be like 1% of the caf) mentioned this regarding De Gea? I think you should let it go.
I probably agree about that comment. We should know better by know not to focus on one attribute of a goalkeeper, because once this declines there's not much else left. So I will be happy with all-round keeper even if he doesn't make a few supersaves a season. Plus I really value a GK who knows how to command the box, time will tell if Onana can do it.
I find it hard to believe that this level of insanity has been presented in the Caf, so I'd be delighted if you pointed to some evidence but don't bother. I guess you mean we lost some games because the striker missed their chances.You conveniently overlooked the beginning of my sentence, which stated that it's still early days. In the first 90 minutes of a new player's career you don't expect the transformation that was widely hailed as the primary reason we needed to get rid of De Gea and bring in Onana (even though our vastly higher priority is a proven striker and it looks like that's not going to happen). But you do expect to see the seedlings of that transformation and we most definitely did not see that last night. Still, as I wrote before, it's early days and maybe we will see the promised "transformation" -- the word that was specifically used over and over. It was always insanity that a new keeper would have a transformational impact on our finishing, which was far and away the weakest aspect of our team performance last season. Martial, Antony and Sancho -- their performances last season had nothing to do with De Gea, yet it was De Gea who got scapegoated here for our poor attack even while he was rightly flogged for mistakes such as the Benrahma goal and the second leg v Sevilla. He was also flogged for the second Gundogan goal and although reasonable minds may disagree on that, it was not De Gea's fault that Gundogan was left completely unmarked at the top of the penalty box.
I find it hard to believe that this level of insanity has been presented in the Caf, so I'd be delighted if you pointed to some evidence but don't bother. I guess you mean we lost some games because the striker missed their chances.
A keeper is against players and against chance. Sometimes there's a bit of luck, sometimes a bit of bad fortune. Doesn't matter if the striker was left unmarked or not.
Anyway, the keeper has little to do with attacking play. However, in modern football keepers have big impact on how the ball is played from the back. I am surprised you didn't see this significant change yesterday to be honest, especially since DDG play from the back was close to non existent. I don't know if you can call it "transformation", but I think it'll be a close call. One thing is for sure, there will be no transformation unless attackers start doing their job.