Rojofiam
Full Member
- Joined
- May 11, 2017
- Messages
- 6,301
Well we kind of did because Urgate brings that.
Ugarte doesn't have the legs to cover.
Well we kind of did because Urgate brings that.
We've definitely got the momentum to overtake them if they have a another couple of bad weeks.For all the doom mongering, we’re only 4 points behind City, albeit playing 1 more game.
Sounds like a good timeEverton are going to get absolutely bummed to death over the Christmas period it's a must win against wolves midweek for them.
I was specifically picking up on criticism of his game today.Cmon lets not act like hes not been the worst player from a bunch of bad form players in the last year and a half. We know his ceiling is world class, we want consistency at the top
Watch from the first goal. Astonishing performance after a drab 20 mins.I missed our best game in years havent i? I have half a mind to go home and watch it to enjoy this.
I was specifically commenting on criticism of his performance today.All he has to do is be consistent.
I love Amad. I really do. He’s young and will improve. His decision making with the pass MUST improve. I don’t mean final third. He’s amazing there. I mean when he plays deeper.
As for Bruno, I think he’s too frivolous in possession phases. He's always going for the wonder pass in transition when sometimes you need the sensible pass. He too must improve. But at his age I don’t see that happening. I love Bruno in an AM role in a back 4 formation. Not a fan in a possession based back 5 formation.
And no one on this forum or in the fan base has any say in whether the same mistake is made again or not. It's up to the glazers and INEOS to not make the mistakes a second timeThere is something to be said about learning from past mistakes.
Both of them were amongst our worse players today. Not saying that will continue but they aren't exactly in great form.Mainoo and Licha out of Arsenal game. That’s a guaranteed loss.
He's top. ZZ Top top player.ZZ is absolutely mint in the middle
Best player on the pitch was Amad ( once again )7.3 for Rashford, with 2 goals in this match. So I guess a hat trick would push his rating up to 8. 5 goals for a 10?
Thanks. He has gotten better steadily since he came back from injury. Class player.Best player on the pitch was Amad ( once again )
I’m delighted he’s doing well for you after the magnificent loan to Sunderland-wish him and you continued success
Was hoping he may “ flop” so we could get him back on loan-no chance now .
Great player and all the best to him and you ( under your new boss )
And no one on this forum or in the fan base has any say in whether the same mistake is made again or not. It's up to the glazers and INEOS to not make the mistakes a second time
Yes, it is literally true that nothing that we write on this forum will have any impact on how the team or any individual player performs. Every comment on his well Amad played, or how poorly someone else played, or any comment of any kind here in one sense is completely irrelevant to the players and management. Given this, should we therefore close down this forum? Or should we observe and comment, flawed as we all are, what we see and we believe will improve the performances of the squad, even in the knowledge that what we write here is no interest to everyone associated with the club?
The latter is why we are all here, to pitch in as best we can, even knowing that club management does not look to the caf for guidance on how the club should be run.
You're misinterpreting my post.
I'm not saying don't comment or have an opinion because it makes no difference to the club. If that was what I meant then as you said we might as well shut everything down.
I was replying to the 'learn from our past mistakes'
This makes no sense to you and me learning or not from past mistakes made at boardroom level because we're not in any place of influence. We need ineos and glazers to learn from these mistakes. We are just observers.
My whole point in this discussion is what is the point in bringing ETH up at every turn to either support or hate on him? He's in the rear view mirror, he is of no consequence to United going forward and I just see it as a pointless divisive point scoring that isn't constructive in any way.
I think if people would use their efforts in hating/supporting ETH towards backing the man that matters today Amorim it would make for a better forum rather than every thread being polluted with BS about ETH one way or another
But surely there is great value in learning from past mistakes, even if it is true that no one who runs United consults RedCafe.
If what you're suggesting that all discussion of what went wrong under ETH is pointless then it's actually just as pointless to discuss what went right under ETH as well as what is going right and wrong under Amorim on a daily basis, since we are all only speaking to each other and none of what we discuss will ever reach the eyes of the people who are in a position to implement the great ideas we all come up with here.
And if your complaint is that the criticism of ETH here is excessive, all good. It should never be personal ("Pep Guardiola is my idol") nor abusive (can't recall any examples, but there have been many abusive posts posted here) but constructive criticism such as his poor communication skills, his stubborness, his easily defeated tactics, his poor player acquisition selection, his freezing out of productive players and continued reliance on poor performing players are all fair game for commentary, so it seems to me.
I think he left the club in a far better situation than what he inherited, don't forget he took over the club when they had it's lowest ever points total the previous season, we had a lot of over paid aging players, players left out of contract eg Pogba. He left with the squad much younger, he got rid of a lot of dead wood albeit not all of it, he did bring in some good players albeit he didn't get the best out of them and Antony was a complete disaster. He also broke the duck of no trophies in 6 years. I'm not arguing he's a big success far from it and ultimately he failed in what we wanted him to achieve and wasn't the right fit for United. It was certainly the right time for him to go and I'm happy with the early signs of what Amorim is about, but I don't think United are at crisis point, the season is far from over for us and if our players adapt to Amorims way of playing quickly we could still have a relatively good season.It's not like we're endlessly debating a bad decision from 10 years ago, such as the appointment of Moyes. ETH only left us a month ago and what he left behind was a club in crisis, a crisis largely of his making, that his successor now is tasked with cleaning up. It is not irrelevant to discuss the lessons Amorim must learn from the failure of his predecessor.
We're going around in circles. We'll have to agree to disagree.@Steve Bruce
I dispute the claim that "every thread" contains harsh criticism of ETH. Some threads yes, but not even most threads and certainly not every thread.
If we were still discussing what went right and wrong under Ole on several threads, or even one thread, it would be a stale and pointless discussion. But ETH was sacked only a month ago and the new manager is working every day, possibly as I'm typing this post right now, to unwind the damage his predecessor had inflicted on the club.
What's crazy about what I had written that you accurately quoted is that I am 100% sure that I had typed "Pep Guardiola is my idol" instead of the words "Pep Guardiola is my idol", which doesn't even make sense as an example of personal criticism of ETH. What I meant to type, which I actually hope to have typed this time, is that personal criticism of ETH (such as "Pep Guardiola is my idol") is out of order here. But by contrast, criticism of his performance as manager -- player acquisition, tactics and so on -- is perfectly in order.
What we saw against Everton was a managerial masterclass that we saw only once under ETH -- the FA Cup win over City -- that although was slightly flattered by the scoreline, there is no doubt whatsoever that the manager got the tactics and personnel right and got the in-game substitutions right. We shall see whether we can pull this off consistently, but whether he can or cannot it is perfectly reasonable to compare the performances of the two managers in the short run because they are working with the same exact squad of players. Until that changes with new players in and out, it is not out of order to observe here how the manager overcomes (or does not and we shall see) from his predecessor.
We're going around in circles. We'll have to agree to disagree.
I think we just have 2 very different outlooks which is perfectly fine. No hard feelings mate
John Brooks