Originally posted by Livvie20:
<strong>
I don't think it's that bad an idea. Forlan is good on the wing, and Scholes can play up front.
But whatever, it isn't the first time we've use players out of position. I think this is where Fergie's reputation for being a poor tactician comes from.</strong><hr></blockquote>
If the experiment works, we'll all be happy, but last season too much experimentation cost us dear imo. He could have played our old midfield for this game, I think this is confirmation that Scholes is now a forward.
Originally posted by Neil Thomson:
<strong>
He could have played our old midfield for this game</strong><hr></blockquote>
our old midfield? what's that?
Originally posted by farawaylands:
<strong>
our old midfield? what's that?</strong><hr></blockquote>
Beckham Scholes Butt Giggs
With Butt interchangeable with Keano.
Originally posted by farawaylands:
<strong>
our old midfield? what's that?</strong><hr></blockquote>
Becks - Keane - Scholes - Giggs
Originally posted by Neil Thomson:
<strong>
Beckham Scholes Butt Giggs
With Butt interchangeable with Keano.</strong><hr></blockquote>
alright, i didn't know butt was match fit...
Originally posted by Neil Thomson:
<strong>I think this is confirmation that Scholes is now a forward.</strong><hr></blockquote>
If it is, would that mean us not buying a forth striker when the transfer window opens again?
Originally posted by osterdal:
<strong>
If it is, would that mean us not buying a forth striker when the transfer window opens again?</strong><hr></blockquote>
We all wanted a creative forward, I guess you might be right that Scholes, Forlan and Giggs are now considered our options for that.
Originally posted by Neil Thomson:
<strong>Y'know that the rumours were that Erikkson was hours away from being our manager? And that he wants him played as a central midfielder... Reckon Beckham might be playing there more often this season than before?</strong><hr></blockquote>
I prefer Beckham on the right, that's for sure.
Originally posted by Neil Thomson:
<strong>The guy on sky thinks we're playing 3 in midfield, with Forlan up front. Do we even have a formation nowadays?</strong><hr></blockquote>
No it looks like Forlan's on the right.
Originally posted by Neil Thomson:
<strong>The guy on sky thinks we're playing 3 in midfield, with Forlan up front. Do we even have a formation nowadays?</strong><hr></blockquote>
Exactly.
I don't mind losing - but ffs let's at least play to our strengths.
No striker will even want to come to Old Trafford at this rate. Unless he's good enough to not need midfield service.
Originally posted by Neil Thomson:
<strong>More and more I think we're trying to play Total Football, its very ambitious, and very demanding, possibly too much.</strong><hr></blockquote>
I think Cruyf will get shivers if he sees this
Originally posted by Livvie20:
<strong>
Exactly.
I don't mind losing - but ffs let's at least play to our strengths.
No striker will even want to come to Old Trafford at this rate. Unless he's good enough to not need midfield service.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Good job you don't mind, because we might just do that now. 1-0 to Charlton, Jenson.
Originally posted by Livvie20:
<strong>
Why can't we get back to playing the way that brought us success, and stop sodding round with formations.</strong><hr></blockquote>
you can blame it on formations and what have you but there is something else that missing...
Originally posted by rz99:
<strong>Good goal by Jensen though.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Of course... He's Danish!!
Originally posted by rz99:
<strong>Good goal by Jensen though.</strong><hr></blockquote>
We're in a crisis!! How could you even say that?
<img src="graemlins/keano.gif" border="0" alt="[Keano]" />
Originally posted by rz99:
<strong>Good goal by Jensen though.</strong><hr></blockquote>
We're in a crisis!! How could you even say that?
<img src="graemlins/keano.gif" border="0" alt="[Keano]" />