James Ducker reporting in the Telegraph that Mourinho is willing to sell Bailly and Rojo in January to bring in a CB to improve our back line.
A joke if we sell Bailly ahead of calamity Jones.James Ducker reporting in the Telegraph that Mourinho is willing to sell Bailly and Rojo in January to bring in a CB to improve our back line.
Woodward tried to sign Perisic, but he (rightfully) won't pay stupidly over-the-top prices. That's why that transfer saga went on for so long as we were hoping Inter would come down to what we felt was a realistic price. Same thing with most of those defenders that we were linked to last transfer window.He was backed the first season, 2017 summer he wanted Perisic and Woodward didn't back him and last summer he got 1 first team signing (so 2 short from what he wanted reportedly). So no, I wouldn't say he has been entirely backed. Saying that, if Mourinho wanted experienced players who were close to already being on the decline, then I can see why the board didn't back that. But that should have been made clear months before the transfer window opened so that players who fit what both Mourinho and the board wanted could be targeted. A DOF could well be the solution for that but that discussion is for another thread.
The thing is with selling - you need to have buyers too. Who wants to buy Jones? I expect West Ham if we ever let him go on a free.A joke if we sell Bailly ahead of calamity Jones.
Mourinho would still play Matic over himI do not care if they have to spend it all on one player, get a midfield general, we need someone to run out game.
If only you could reply with a non sarcastic reply and say “Hey new guy, there is a transfer forum, thread is already there.”If only there was a thread on this in the transfer forum.
Thanks dude!Hey new guy, there is a transfer forum, thread is already there.
I reckon he'll get a CB in January as well, similar to how we got Sanchez last Jan when Perisic wasn't signed. However, we should only be signing one that will improve us quality wise and not just for the sake of it.I think he'll get a CB in Jan. Probably not the ones people want because they wont be available. But someone expensive who hopefully wont be out on their ass when a new manager comes in.
Yeah that's a fair point. City did the same thing a few years ago and put their foot down with clubs trying to extort them for players or players for wages. It's also resulted in them missing out on players in recent years. However, City are/were in a much better place to be playing hard ball as their squad is/was a lot more complete than ours. We have several key positions that still haven't been addressed and every year there'll be 1/2 new areas that'll need investment. If we refuse to strengthen areas, the problems will only exacerbate and performances will drop.Woodward tried to sign Perisic, but he (rightfully) won't pay stupidly over-the-top prices. That's why that transfer saga went on for so long as we were hoping Inter would come down to what we felt was a realistic price. Same thing with most of those defenders that we were linked to last transfer window.
You could say that Woodward isn't backing him entirely, but at the same time it's not like Woodward has been straight up saying that he wouldn't sign these players. I see the word 'veto' used a lot in these discussions (not by you, just in general), which always annoys me as it paints a much more divided picture than I think is reality. Every club will of course have a limit to how much they are willing to pay for each individual player, and we've simply been hitting that limit lately. Whether that is because we're not moving with the current economic situation, whether it's because we are targeting the wrong players who can't be signed for realistic prices, or whether it's because we have a stigma of overpaying so these selling clubs are trying to take us for a ride and Woodward is trying to reign that in...who knows. Probably a combination of all three.
Woodward wants to see some money come in before buying. Jones can only be let go on free. Wont fetch a dime. He also is like the 3rd or the 4th lowest salaried player in the teamA joke if we sell Bailly ahead of calamity Jones.
Objectively speaking , it got us the Europa League, League Cup, PL runner-up and an FA Cup final.
It's not so simple a decision to hold back or spend the funds .
A joke if we sell Bailly ahead of calamity Jones.
Woodward wants to see some money come in before buying. Jones can only be let go on free. Wont fetch a dime. He also is like the 3rd or the 4th lowest salaried player in the team
Bailly is a good defender but low on confidence. He was our best defender in his debut season. With a good run of games he'll rediscover that form. He should get more time. Jones had time to prove himself and failed. His time his up now.Bailly has value, the only reason why I can see he is sold ahead of Jones. Jones needs to go period though.