VancouverUtdFan
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2017
- Messages
- 2,514
- Supports
- Canucks + NE Patriots
Anyone know what he’s smoking bcuz I want some of it
Lol! So if City can't afford it then who can?
United?
Barca?
PSG?
They're the only other teams I can think of who are capable of paying for the most expensive players. For the record I like Guardiola, I admire his outlook on the game but he is in complete denial here or has an awful relationship with the board at City.
Yep, and they claim they're good with youth.Read a stat that their academy graduates have only 7 epl minutes.
Is this true?
I never thought I'd see the day that Pep and Man City are complaining about a lack of funds. What kind of world is this?
Anyone know what he’s smoking bcuz I want some of it
Pep has shown himself to be nothing but a cheque-book manager who can only win in the best teams and with players of a certain skillset. City had a good enough squad to win the PL last season or to be at least closer to Chelsea. They ended the season trophyless. Their star performers this season were all there last season too. KDB, Silva, Fernandinho, Sterling, Aguero. They also couldn't beat Monaco in the last 16 when Pellegrini got them to the semis the year before. Peps solution was to throw money at the situation though and only after spending 400 million does he have a team who can win things. For me he will never be a better manager than Mourinho until he can win with teams who aren't the best. Would Pep win the CL for Porto? Clearly not based on his trophyless season last year with a much better City team. Let's see how many people he can fool with these comments about a limited budget.We are living in some sort of Twilight-zone episode where City are the ones with the moral high ground, and United are the evil Money FC team.
I see nobody's willing to entertain the possibility that, in what might be his third or fourth language, Pep's clumsily explained that the City board won't sanction £70m+/£500k-a-week for a player in the way United's board do.
Making things up?I see nobody's willing to entertain the possibility that, in what might be his third or fourth language, Pep's clumsily explained that the City board won't sanction £70m+/£500k-a-week for a player in the way United's board do.
£70m+ (plus).We have a £70m player on 500k\week? That is news to me.
We do have a £89m player on 275k\week and a free transfer on 300k+\week wages though.
His words were ‘to compete in 4 competitions you need to be lucky with injuries, or have 22 top players’ and then went on to state city can’t afford 22 top players.I see nobody's willing to entertain the possibility that, in what might be his third or fourth language, Pep's clumsily explained that the City board won't sanction £70m+/£500k-a-week for a player in the way United's board do.
£70m+ (plus).
Also widely reported that Sanchez is on something much steeper than £300k+, which is still a good £50k more than anything our highest paid player is on.
Do you write a lot of Manchester City fiction? Because those figures don’t make sense.I see nobody's willing to entertain the possibility that, in what might be his third or fourth language, Pep's clumsily explained that the City board won't sanction £70m+/£500k-a-week for a player in the way United's board do.
Do you write a lot of Manchester City fiction? Because those figures don’t make sense.
Pep has shown himself to be nothing but a cheque-book manager who can only win in the best teams and with players of a certain skillset. City had a good enough squad to win the PL last season or to be at least closer to Chelsea.
£70m+ (plus).
Also widely reported that Sanchez is on something much steeper than £300k+. Besides, £300k is still a good £50k more than anything our highest paid player is on.
One day it was widely reported to be 300k. The next day it was widely reported to be 400k. After that, it was widely reported to be 500k and we've even seen some reports of 600k pop up. I guess people will just accept whatever suits their agenda. Who needs facts anyway?£70m+ (plus).
Also widely reported that Sanchez is on something much steeper than £300k+. Besides, £300k is still a good £50k more than anything our highest paid player is on.
Just about sums it all up. Jose said the same thing, City fans take the piss on Bluemoon. Pep then does it, This time Utd fans take the piss. Just like the players wages, Both sets of fans seem to know exactly what the other sides players earn without having any idea whatsoever. You'll never ever take those Blue/Red tinted glasses off folk.City fans need to smarten up. Pep complaining about any kind of lack of financial support from the club is pathetic, just like it was for Jose to do so a month back (and many United fans here said as much).