Classical Mechanic
Full Member
Their league form over the past 6 has been more normal. 3 wins, 2 draws and 1 defeat.
I don't see anyone losing their minds over it.
Dramatic? Much?
As for the last paragraph, that is pretty much the first introduction for every young player.
Yet another guardiola issue I simply can't understand the worshippers backing him on. It's ansolute nothing to do with supporting anyone, even a total neutral would see that as a perfect opportunity to see an academy player get experience as being part of a match day squad - Ferguson for example often did it nearing the end of a season. Imagine being the best performing youth player, an opportunity like that arises and he prefers to leave the seat EMPTY. He's an enormous attention seeker and roaring hypocrite and that would incredibly disheartening to a young player, they must thing "he doesn't even want to know about us".
Some of you would rather do anything that allow even a fair criticism, however minor, to be aimed at him. I've never seen a cult like following of this intensity in 20 plus years following football.
So the guy is a supposed master at developing youth players, but he doesn’t have a single one that is better than an empty chair?
OTT and spiteful? To think that a live body is better than an empty chair?For example these posts were OTT and just spiteful:
It was nice of him to invite a supporter to the bench if you ask me!OTT and spiteful? To think that a live body is better than an empty chair?
I see what you did there, and I like it.It was nice of him to invite a supporter to the bench if you ask me!
OTT and spiteful? To think that a live body is better than an empty chair?
Scored the winner, maybe...?What would the player have offered over the empty spot when they are not going to play? You're reading in to it far too much and clearly see it as him making some sort of statement. As somebody else mentioned in the thread, he did this numerous times at Bayern and quite rightly nobody cared.
What would the player have offered over the empty spot when they are not going to play?
He did it with Barcelona B team6 man bench was a joke. "I didnt sign Mahrez for 60m so i cant name a 7th sub, even though i have an academy i just dont want to use them, they arent expensive enough"
Read an interesting quote from a pundit the other day online, said "When pep starts winning things and playing beautiful football with a West Ham, Newcastle, Everton, Southampton etc - then i will join the bandwagon, until then hes had it far too easy"
Fair point id guess, in a sense
People aren’t saying he walked into the Barca Job. Just that he’s this supposedly great promoter of youth players into his teams and didn’t take this opportunity to give a young player the chance to see what it was like in the first team. Also the fact that he brought so many into the Barca side was due to the fact that he had worked with them for the year (or 2?) prior, it could’ve gone wrong but it didn’t and he has sort of rode the praise since because he didn’t promote at Bayern and at City, which indicates it’s the outlier as opposed the norm.He did it with Barcelona B team
Won the league with them and they were more organised and coached better than the main team
He dind't just walk into the Barca job despite what people will lead you to believe
What would the player have offered over the empty spot when they are not going to play? You're reading in to it far too much and clearly see it as him making some sort of statement. As somebody else mentioned in the thread, he did this numerous times at Bayern and quite rightly nobody cared.
People aren’t saying he walked into the Barca Job. Just that he’s this supposedly great promoter of youth players into his teams and didn’t take this opportunity to give a young player the chance to see what it was like in the first team. Also the fact that he brought so many into the Barca side was due to the fact that he had worked with them for the year (or 2?) prior, it could’ve gone wrong but it didn’t and he has sort of rode the praise since because he didn’t promote at Bayern and at City, which indicates it’s the outlier as opposed the norm.
Not sure.That was completely unnecessary.
They are those within the English media that would love to being him down a peg. Gives them some ammunition. There's only so much that the City propaganda machine can spin.
Kimmich had already played 55 games for Leipzig before Bayern signed him.The latter isn't true, he brought through Kimich at Bayern
It was 600k at the end.Not sure.
They can spin 300-350k per week to 500k per week + bonuses so i"d say they'll try to spin anything.
What would the player have offered over the empty spot when they are not going to play? You're reading in to it far too much and clearly see it as him making some sort of statement. As somebody else mentioned in the thread, he did this numerous times at Bayern and quite rightly nobody cared.
Scored the winner, maybe...?
From this logic, what's the point in having 7 substitutes when only 3 are going to play?
The experience of being with the first team squad?
City have spent a truckload on youth development that can't even fill a bench. Pep was making a selfish point when he could have given one of the kids the greatest days of their careers to date.
Not trying to be dramatic, maybe it was the words I used. Gary Nevil was in hysterics. The same reaction is shared not just on here but other websites, keen to make a big deal out of nothing. For example these posts were OTT and just spiteful:
How would you know?That's a moot point. How can a player score the winner when they have no chance of playing in the match?
That's a moot point. How can a player score the winner when they have no chance of playing in the match?
No there isn’t, however by not filling the 7 subs spot Pep has looked arrogant and disrespectful towards Burnley. Let’s go back to the days of no subs that’ll please Pep then...To cover injuries/change of tactics/fatigue etc. however City had obviously planned to play the full 90 and had each position covered. Furthermore, there is no obligation to have 7 substitutes or bring 3 substitutes on.
I disagree, it would be pointless. They are going to be warming the bench for 1 maybe 2 games and then back to the youth team.
What does everyone think it would take for the media to turn on Pep? We've seen them turn on plenty of managers in the past. Pep having a little pop at them?
What does everyone think it would take for the media to turn on Pep? We've seen them turn on plenty of managers in the past. Pep having a little pop at them?
We know it’s unlikely, but there’s always the chance. Football..bloody hell
No there isn’t, however by not filling the 7 subs spot Pep has looked arrogant and disrespectful towards Burnley. Let’s go back to the days of no subs that’ll please Pep then...
But surely them getting some experience would aid their game and make them try harder? You’ve obviously not thought about the positive reward mentality. The youth players may now think..”what’s the point, no matter how well I play I’m not getting into the first team!”.
Look at Rashford for example, he wasn’t rated as highly as some. What would’ve happened if LVG hadn’t named him in that midytlland game but chose to make a statement of how hard done by he his (at one of the richest clubs in the world too..)
And your spiteful comment was a little ott agree?
Not really, those people are blowing it out of all proportion when all I’m saying is that it’s neglible. The reason they are making a big deal out of it is to have a go at Pep. I’m sure they will get over it. Moyes did it a couple of weeks ago and nobody cared.
A bit like how mourinho was bad for C.Ronaldo at Madrid?I think Rashford and Martial under Pep would develop much more as attacking players the way Pep made Sterling play like a young Ronaldo.
Mourinho’s defensive approach is an obstacle to offensive players.
I think Rashford and Martial under Pep would develop much more as attacking players the way Pep made Sterling play like a young Ronaldo.
Mourinho’s defensive approach is an obstacle to offensive players.
Must mean diving then...Sterling doesn’t play anything like either Ronaldo, young or otherwise.
How I love this kind of cliches.I think Rashford and Martial under Pep would develop much more as attacking players the way Pep made Sterling play like a young Ronaldo.
Mourinho’s defensive approach is an obstacle to offensive players.