I still think it’s likely that all Liverpool (their former City scouts) did was access a cloud database of scouting data that they had access to when they were employed by City and likely never had their credentials removed.
Manchester City banned from CL for 2 seasons and fined 30 million euros | CAS - Ban lifted, fined 10 million
- Thread starter roonster09
- Start date
I still think it’s likely that all Liverpool (their former City scouts) did was access a cloud database of scouting data that they had access to when they were employed by City and likely never had their credentials removed.
In a corporate world, it's still a crime but in this context, I am not sure if it's a big deal.
Plauisble deniability though, they could claim LastPass logged them in automatically and they didn’t realise
Surely that's merely a Trump-style 'defence' anyway: "I may have shot that guy dead...but he didn't return the cd I lent him! So lemme off, or I'll call you hypocrites."
I'd say ban them both and remove whatever it is They won and/or about to win in that period. Give the titles to the 2nd places (or the finalists).
That's not accurate. These owners want to win now. They have no desire to grow organically. They certain could try if they wanted as there are many blueprints and examples of this. There is also nothing stopping a sugar daddy funded team from picking apart poorer clubs so I don't understand stand this point either.
Add another year or two to the ban for those outfits.
https://www.manchestereveningnews.c.../manchester-city-players-rock-double-17812889
https://www.manchestereveningnews.c.../manchester-city-players-rock-double-17812889
Oh it's real, I think they have some deal with a fashion brand. I'm no fashion expert and I have seen attempts to make double denim an actual thing but it has and always will be the greatest of clothing sins.
Can't. Breathe. Laughing. Too. Hard.
Please tell me you Photoshopped this.
Bad taste is in their jeans
Uefa must have some pretty strong evidence to go for two years otherwise the backlash they could face is just mind boggling. And yet City claim no wrong doing. Something just doesn't add up.
What the feck are they wearing that for?
They have a deal with Dsquared2 (Expensive but chavvy brand) but why on earth are sportsmen traveling to a big game in double denim. Id have it if it was a Dsquared2 tracksuit and the brand's trademark baseball cap but what is this. They look like a set of daft wankers.
They have a deal with Dsquared2 (Expensive but chavvy brand) but why on earth are sportsmen traveling to a big game in double denim. Id have it if it was a Dsquared2 tracksuit and the brand's trademark baseball cap but what is this. They look like a set of daft wankers.
Didn't even offer to get your coatBad taste is in their jeans
It might be denim.Didn't even offer to get your coat
Please don't denimgrate me for my jokes/punsDidn't even offer to get your coat
Getting used to prison uniforms?
Someone needs to report them to the fashion police.
Instead of a ban are they all going straight to jail?
Don't pass Go and no get out of jail card.Instead of a ban are they all going straight to jail?
Have the FA/PL addressed this at all? Who gets the 4th spot? Will they be doing their own investigation? Do they comply with PL FFP rules?
The lack of clarity is alarming.
The lack of clarity is alarming.
Alright a club suit or tracksuit but as a grown man being forced to wear double denim.....how degrading.
No. We have slightly better taste than that.
What a fecked up club. Who approved/wanted that? Vomit.
I've been to Alberta, you can't fool me.
Which one of them has all of the prison blue print tatooed on his back and chest?
Were ye drama queens not alive during the NSYNC/Backstreet Boys/Westlife days?
In this leaked document by Der Spiegel you see how they falsified the numbers of Etihad sponsorship. Etihad payed only 8 m, but they registered 67m. The rest comes from ADUG the owners of Man city.
So what happens when the appeal is still ongoing come May? Is the ban upheld?
Wonder if UEFA could double it for a frivolous appeal?
No they can't.
In this leaked document by Der Spiegel you see how they falsified the numbers of Etihad sponsorship. Etihad payed only 8 m, but they registered 67m. The rest comes from ADUG the owners of Man city.
looks legit
So there's not going to be any benefit from finishing in 5th this season then. This isn't going to be sorted in time.
Why exactly? Please tell.
They won't say anything publicly unless it's concrete. City will have lawyers all over this and any wrong move from the PL will be disastrous.
Well if they appeal this (which they have), the ban will be postponed until the outcome of the hearing. I was also reading that City can then try and delay it. That's a lot of work to be done by may.
Thought they said it would be dealt with in time so clubs know where they stand?