Man Utd board warming to Inter Milan boss Mourinho

Who should replace SAF after he retires ?

  • Jose Mourinho

    Votes: 270 58.1%
  • Laurent Blanc

    Votes: 61 13.1%
  • Steve Bruce

    Votes: 8 1.7%
  • Roy Keane

    Votes: 4 0.9%
  • Ole Gunnar Solskjaer

    Votes: 25 5.4%
  • Fabio Capello

    Votes: 10 2.2%
  • Pep Guardiola

    Votes: 8 1.7%
  • Arsene Wenger

    Votes: 5 1.1%
  • Mark Hughes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • David Moyes

    Votes: 17 3.7%
  • Gus Hiddink

    Votes: 9 1.9%
  • Ottmar Hitzfeld

    Votes: 2 0.4%
  • Eric Cantona

    Votes: 12 2.6%
  • Alec McCleish

    Votes: 1 0.2%
  • Frank Rijkaard

    Votes: 2 0.4%
  • Louis Van Gaal

    Votes: 2 0.4%
  • Mike Phelan

    Votes: 1 0.2%
  • Carlos Quieroz

    Votes: 2 0.4%
  • Dick Advocaat

    Votes: 4 0.9%
  • Harry Redknapp

    Votes: 1 0.2%
  • Marcello Lippi

    Votes: 2 0.4%
  • Martin O'Neill

    Votes: 19 4.1%

  • Total voters
    465
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Apart from the Champions league with Porto, Mourinho has been heavily favorites to win every trophy he's won. And apart from this season where a dodgy handball has helped him to the final (as dodgy decisions helped Porto) he's been woeful in the champions leauge.
 
I think Moyes would be an outstanding manager with man managment skills to match anyone if he became manager of United and Mourinho probably wont be available to select for us when the day comes so Moyes is probably more likely to get the gig! But you would definitely worry about Moyes lack of European experience!
 
You still haven't answered a question asked twice previously - Name 5 players worth mentioning that Mourinho has brought up from the youth team in his "trophy-laden" Chelsea and Inter career.

So for Mourinho to succeed as a top class manager, he has to bring through loads of kids ala Wenger?
 
You don't see the validity of someone thinking it would be baffling to propose Moyes, a manager who hasn't accomplished anything whatsoever, to replace Fergie, over Mourinho- who has won everything under the sun ?

No. It's not always the most obvious choice that makes he best appointment. Just because a manager has yet to win a major trophy doesn't lessen his achievements in the job he is doing or mean he us any less skilled or suited to the job. There are many factors, and every manager needs to be given a chance to test himself, like Mourinho was once at Porto.

To be so dismissive is arrogant and flawed as no one knows who will be the best fit.
 
57% of the Caf agree with me anyway, that's enough for me.

I'm off to bed to dream about Mourinho in charge of my beloved United one day

:drool:

Goodnight x
 
You still haven't answered a question asked twice previously - Name 5 players worth mentioning that Mourinho has brought up from the youth team in his "trophy-laden" Chelsea and Inter career.

I can't think of any to be honest - mainly because he hasn't stayed with any of his clubs long enough to do it, which can't be considered a disqualifying factor given that none of the other candidates have done it AND won the trophies that he has.
 
none of the other candidates have done it AND won the trophies that he has.
Look up Moyes' record. And like I said, he is up against United, Chelsea, Arsenal, and Liverpool, with the budget that he has. He hasn't done badly either. You're really discrediting him for no reason.

At least you're not being a prat like Plan M.
 
I can't think of any to be honest - mainly because he hasn't stayed with any of his clubs long enough to do it, which can't be considered a disqualifying factor given that none of the other candidates have done it AND won the trophies that he has.

Bingo - you're here proposing a future manager for United and you can't name a single youth player he's brought through.

With that in mind, how is he appropriate for United?

Unfortunately, I can all too easily imagine him having the same effect on young players as Benitez does on them at Liverpool...
 
No. It's not always the most obvious choice that makes he best appointment. Just because a manager has yet to win a major trophy doesn't lessen his achievements in the job he is doing or mean he us any less skilled or suited to the job. There are many factors, and every manager needs to be given a chance to test himself, like Mourinho was once at Porto.

To be so dismissive is arrogant and flawed as no one knows who will be the best fit.

What may seem like arrogance and dismissiveness to you, is simple logic to the majority. Ultimately, Football is a business where winning matters both to fans as well as the club itself. History doesn't favor mediocrity over excellence.
 
Bingo - you're here proposing a future manager for United and you can't name a single youth player he's brought through.

With that in mind, how is he appropriate for United?

Unfortunately, I can all too easily imagine him having the same effect on young players as Benitez does on them at Liverpool...

Quite simply because its not the defining factor. The defining factor is his managerial CV. Not having managed a club side for 25 years as Fergie has will not disqualify anyone. Its what they've actually accomplished that will separate the men from the boys.
 
What may seem like arrogance and dismissiveness to you, is simple logic to the majority. Ultimately, Football is a business where winning matters both to fans as well as the club itself. History doesn't favor mediocrity over excellence.
Winning with a certain style matters to me, personally, actually. I'm not talking about the style of play here, but how we get the success. Throughout our history, we've had a great youth setup, have given youngsters many chances to impress, and have emplyed an attacking style of play, and we've built upon that. Mourinho brings neither to the table.

I'd rather have not have great success with City's/Chelsea's style, and have it our way, even if we don't win everything there is to win every year.
 
What may seem like arrogance and dismissiveness to you, is simple logic to the majority. Ultimately, Football is a business where winning matters both to fans as well as the club itself. History doesn't favor mediocrity over excellence.

In which way is it logical to dismiss Moyes as a potential United manager purely on the fact he hasn't won the Premier League at bust Everton?

Yep, fantastic logic there.

By the way, what do you make of the repeated reports in the press that Alex Ferguson favours Moyes as his successor?
 
Quite simply because its not the defining factor. The defining factor is his managerial CV. Not having managed a club side for 25 years as Fergie has will not disqualify anyone. Its what they've actually accomplished that will separate the men from the boys.

And accomplishment = winning for you?
 
Quite simply because its not the defining factor. The defining factor is his managerial CV. Not having managed a club side for 25 years as Fergie has will not disqualify anyone. Its what they've actually accomplished that will separate the men from the boys.

So, basically, you attach no importance to our youth team set up?

Manchester United is wasted on some of you lot...
 
1.Scott Sinclair
2.Michael Mancienne
3.Francesco Bolzoni
4.Davide Santon
5.Mario Balotelli
Come on now, other than Balotelli, who wasn't even bought up at Inter, and who is a fecking idiot of the highest order, there is no player in that list who ever can say - "Wow, I saw him play!" - about. And I doubt they will grow up to be those players.
 
I'd imagine it was a combination of the two, to be honest. But reaching the Champions League final for the second time in 6 years is what he was celebrating the most, I would say.

And he took to the pitch and went over to the Inter fans, if he had really wanted to wind up Barca's fans he would have done, like he did the Liverpool supporters in the League Cup Final.

That was actually quite funny
 
In which way is it logical to dismiss Moyes as a potential United manager purely on the fact he hasn't won the Premier League at bust Everton?

Absolutely. Not only has he not won it, he hasn't come remotely close.


By the way, what do you make of the repeated reports in the press that Alex Ferguson favours Moyes as his successor?

As with 99% of the articles published, its probably the press making things up to sell papers. Fergie may also like Alec McLeish or Ottmar Hitzfeld.
 
Come on now, other than Balotelli, who wasn't even bought up at Inter, and who is a fecking idiot of the highest order, there is no player in that list who ever can say - "Wow, I saw him play!" - about. And I doubt they will grow up to be those players. I can say that about Rooney (Moyes, and he has a few more now), and many United ones (SAF).

Santon is an excellent young player, bolzoni could easily be at some point if he starts thinking things through, mancienne could be a handy player as could Sinclair.

At worst there even with dan gosling, brought up by Plymouth too might I add.
 
What may seem like arrogance and dismissiveness to you, is simple logic to the majority. Ultimately, Football is a business where winning matters both to fans as well as the club itself. History doesn't favor mediocrity over excellence.

This is turning into a pointless circular argument. We ALL want us to continue to be succesful, however as I keep saying, no appointment will guarantee success.
 
So, basically, you attach no importance to our youth team set up?

Manchester United is wasted on some of you lot...

On the contrary, its obviously been a big part of our continued success, but its illogical to expect the next manager to have both the longevity required to have amassed a CV on running a youth set up AND the necessary CV of proving that he's capable of winning the league and CL. The latter is that will be the defining characteristic of who gets hired (imo).
 
Absolutely. Not only has he not won it, he hasn't come remotely close.




As with 99% of the articles published, its probably the press making things up to sell papers. Fergie may also like Alec McLeish or Ottmar Hitzfeld.

Are you for real? You're holding Moyes' 'failure' to win the PL while at Everton against him? Seriously? Christ...
 
Are you for real? You're holding Moyes' 'failure' to win the PL while at Everton against him? Seriously? Christ...

Only within the context that some are actually proposing him to manage Man United. For me, he's a good mid table manager, managing a mid table side. Nothing more.
 
So santon and balotelli aren't excellent young footballers I take it? Despite balotelli being spoken of to go to the world cup and santon making ronaldo look poor last season?
Hutton made Ronaldo look average at best in Ronaldo's career's best ever season. It doesn't mean that much. And no, Balotelli isn't an "exciting" young footballer. He's good, but he's really over-rated, and he's a whiner, disrespectful to his manager, team-mates, fans, and club, and there is no way in hell he's going to the WC. SAF said Welbeck would be on the plane to South Africa, I really wouldn't read too much in to that.
 
Only within the context that some are actually proposing him to manage Man United. For me, he's a good mid table manager, managing a mid table side. Nothing more.

Utter rubbish. Sorry - it's pure arrogance, or ignorance, to dismiss Moyes as a 'good mid table manager. Nothing more'...

For a start, he's got a side with one of the lowest budgets in the League into the top 4...

I think I've reached the point of giving up with you...
 
And could he reasonably be expected to with Everton?

Not at all, but then again neither could Mourinho have been expected to win the CL at Porto. For me, that sort of overachievment is what separates him from the rest of the candidates in the poll.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.