It's not looking great, is it? Both City and Liverpool doing excellent business, Mahrez is a fantastic signing for them. Am really hoping we make a game-changing signing before the window closes
I don't find it surprising in the least. He was one of those who downed tools on Ranieri and Jose is probably understandably wary over players like that after the way his second stint at Chelsea ended.Really strange why we didn't seem to be interested, he ticks all the boxes for a gaping hole in our squad.
Meh.
I just hope we have a good target in mind, I really wouldn't mind that Lozano from Mexico, he looks a player.
Mahrez is going to play on the Right wing. So, he would start most of the games and rotate with Sterling... Sane is going to start on the LW.So City has paid 60M or whatever for possibly a 4th choice winger, aged 27. Right.
And clubs wonder why their academy stars are going to Germany.
If this leaves Sterling or Sane short of playing time and unhappy figures, the league should be thrilled with this move.
Remember how Everton “won” the last transfer window and how well everyone thought they’d do? And when we “won” the transfer window with di Maria and falcao? The truth is that nobody knows for sure how transfers will work out for anyone.
Mahrez is going to play on the Right wing. So, he would start most of the games and rotate with Sterling... Sane is going to start on the LW.
Because City/Liverpool don’t have whiny fans who hate the idea of added quality. If we sign Mahrez, Lingard FC will go bonkers on Jose for trying to stifle his talent.
Jose signed Sanchez and the fans of Martial believe it’s the sole reason Martial’s form went to shit & ultimately cost him a place in the World Cup squad.
Good players embrace the challenge, weak players run from the challenge of having to compete with quality players. City have Sterling, David Silva, Bernado Silva and Sane as wing options and yet they are still going after Mahrez.
I don’t think United fans would want that much quality on the wing cos it would limit the game time of their favourite players. United fans idolise the players much more than the club.
They do aim for a quadruple, remember ?Do city really need him?
Mahrez is going to play on the Right wing. So, he would start most of the games and rotate with Sterling... Sane is going to start on the LW.
That would be odd since Sterling is the best winger they have -- before the transfer and after.
Sterling aint a better footballer then Mahrez
Pretty much every statistical measure says otherwise. And Sterling is younger and still yet to reach his peak. Maybe they got Mahrez just to play against Liverpool since Sterling doesn't usually do too well against them haha.
Pretty much every statistical measure says otherwise. And Sterling is younger and still yet to reach his peak. Maybe they got Mahrez just to play against Liverpool since Sterling doesn't usually do too well against them haha.
No white text?City can have who they want as long as we sign Maguire.
pls noCity can have who they want as long as we sign Maguire.
You just need your own eyes to see Marhez is a more talented footballer than Sterling.
Yeah, pesky things like objective evidence just in the way of "the eye test". My next question is always "how do I know that you know what you're looking at and how to assess?"
Mahrez to me was a one year wonder that played over his head like everyone else on that team that year, largely due to N'Golo Kante's influence on the game. Mahrez is good, of course, but Sterling is rounding into one of the best all-around wide attackers in the league and will only get better.
The market would agree if Sterling was at all for sale.
I think your choosing to see what you want to see, Sterling is a good player, absolutely no doubt but his performances are helped massively by playing in the best team in the league for arguably the best manager in the league. He relies massively on his pace, and for space to play into. Marhez is technically a better player in most aspects of his game, stats wise he equalled Stirling's assist figure and still got 11 goals for a team that finished 9th.
When people say why can't we do our business like Chelsea or City, they need to remember how long this has been rumbling on, and still isn't done.
Pretty much every statistical measure says otherwise. And Sterling is younger and still yet to reach his peak. Maybe they got Mahrez just to play against Liverpool since Sterling doesn't usually do too well against them haha.
Yeah, pesky things like objective evidence just in the way of "the eye test". My next question is always "how do I know that you know what you're looking at and how to assess?"
Mahrez to me was a one year wonder that played over his head like everyone else on that team that year, largely due to N'Golo Kante's influence on the game. Mahrez is good, of course, but Sterling is rounding into one of the best all-around wide attackers in the league and will only get better.
The market would agree if Sterling was at all for sale.
I think your choosing to see what you want to see, Sterling is a good player, absolutely no doubt but his performances are helped massively by playing in the best team in the league for arguably the best manager in the league. He relies massively on his pace, and for space to play into. Marhez is technically a better player in most aspects of his game, stats wise he equalled Stirling's assist figure and still got 11 goals for a team that finished 9th.
People who use stats as definitive evidence in football, don’t understand football. They can be helpful, but that’s it.
And I think people here are biased by him having played for Liverpool and City where Mahrez hasn't played for either one -- yet. So they haven't got as negative an impression.
Whatever, the market and pretty much every club in the league agrees with me. If Sterling was sold he'd go for more than 100M, easily more. He's already been sold for about what Mahrez was in a less heady market, as a less developed player.
Sterling will never be able to shoot, he scores lots of tap ins, that is a skill in itself but you take away Silva and KDB putting them on a plate for him and you see what Sterling is really like with England
I'd say its more because he gets into the box more often rather than his shooting is betterHe has definitely improved from the past couple of years, during which he also had Silva and KDB at his disposal. 23 goals compared with 10 the year before.
I'd say its more because he gets into the box more often rather than his shooting is better
Really don't know where the notion that he's a Ben Arfa type personality has come from.Mahrez is obviously a very good player but he also sounds like he d probably be a massive PIA to deal with for the club. No point in getting sour over someone who the club doesn't want or someone who doesnt wanna come here. Next.
he's being paid over £100k/week and had his agent talk about slavery when we turned down a bid that came in on the last day of a transfer window and any Promise would have been made by a manager he played a part in getting sacked very early in the season oh and lets not forget HE WENT ON FECKING STRIKE at a time when we had a realistic chance of cracking the top 6 which completely derailed our seasonReally don't know where the notion that he's a Ben Arfa type personality has come from.
He was the consummmate professional from the moment his star rose high enough for elite clubs to come in for him, ignoring interest from Arsenal in 2015-2016 before playing all through the 2016-2017 summer speculation while the likes of Coutinho, Sanchez and Van Djik were hit by horribly unfortunate injuries.
It was only when he had his move to Manchester City scuppered in January by absurd £90m demands from Leicester - raised from £40m the previous summer and despite already having been promised his move should an acceptable offer be presented - and so he probably really started to fear his ambitions would go unfulfilled and began attempting to force things.
Natural PITA he is not, he's always come across as a super humble guy to me, getting kicked around in the Championship to now.
The transfer was being discussed for 2/3 weeks prior to the last-minute bid, the bid only happened as a last-ditch "try our luck" response to Leicester's exorbitant demands. Diabate had already been brought in as an insurance policy anyway and Patrick Roberts was supposed to be part of the deal so having to replace Mahrez was a non-issue.he's being paid over £100k/week and had his agent talk about slavery when we turned down a bid that came in on the last day of a transfer window and any Promise would have been made by a manager he played a part in getting sacked very early in the season oh and lets not forget HE WENT ON FECKING STRIKE at a time when we had a realistic chance of cracking the top 6 which completely derailed our season