Meanwhile fecking City can get 35m from Saudi for one of their cast-offs no problem
Laporte is levels above maguire.
Maguire | he stays!
- Thread starter Zoo
- Start date
Laporte is levels above maguire.
Name a transfer where a player gets severance. It only happens on mutual termination of contract. As with Sanchez and Ronaldo.
And no the players can choose to stay at United. If a player choses to join another club via transfer they are not entitled to serverance.
Similarly if your job makes you redundant you get severance. If you get a new job, even on a lower salary you get no severance.
There is a reason the clubs public stance is that they value Maguire as an important member of the squad. If he leaves its his choice and the club owes him nothing,
So is Lindelof apparently
And you think ETH has the same power and influence at the club that SAF used to have? ETH has to say what he has been told to say, he is the clubs YES man when it comes to situations like this.
Or may be the problem also lies on DOF. There must be a reason for the failure of the transfer for the unwanted players. From Henderson, Baily, Maguire to Mctominay. They all failed just because players are greedy?
Don’t believe what ETHs says in public.
Yep. P+P cost too much.
We should just go back to signing players on a 3yr contract with the extra 1yr option for the club....simples.
Or he could leave and go play football while still being handsomely rewarded.
I wonder why Maguire does not appear to be of interest to Saudi clubs like City's Laporte is. It wouldn't be because he is not considered to be very good now...would it??!
Why not? The other side of this argument is saying that "Harry should pay us money to play football elsewhere"
Maguire through possible bad advice is going to have a very difficult season, he is going to become public enemy number 1 in the eyes of many, he is not going to get hardly any minutes, wreck his England career and have a very difficult time all around.
If he somehow got back into the team he will not win around a section of the fans and everyone will be willing his first big mistake.
Whatever you think of his ability then you can’t on a personal level want that on anyone. I really hope for his mindset that he gets out now so that he can reset. He is finished at Utd.
If he somehow got back into the team he will not win around a section of the fans and everyone will be willing his first big mistake.
Whatever you think of his ability then you can’t on a personal level want that on anyone. I really hope for his mindset that he gets out now so that he can reset. He is finished at Utd.
He’ll get a hiding from the crowd and lose his England place to Colwill. He’s being an idiot.
He won't have enough appearances to qualify for any trophy we do win. Don't they need 10 full matches in the PL? He managed 6 last time. He's also not leading the defense if we progress to the semis of any cup competition.
Why would Maguire need to pay United? You’ll need to explain that.
At the point Maguire transfers to a new club, he is no longer employed by United. As per the terms of his contract, he is no longer owed any future payments since he has agreed to no longer fulfil his contractual obligations to United.
Maguire is within his rights to refuse a transfer. That is the only way he is entitled to future payments.
If money is his issue, hopefully he’ll go Suadi
I don’t think that’s a thing anymore is it? Think you just need to be registered in the squad.
5th choice, we care, he's a terrible fit, and he's barely adequate as 5th choice.
If he does not want the transfer he stays as 5th choice as the manager has said.
“The club want to sell him” yes but they are also happy to keep him in the squad.
He does not want the transfer. Again not true, he does but on the condition the club pays him severance. He’d like to be first choice and not lose his England place.
Thats the stance. If he wants to actually leave he’ll get no severance. Its his choice and this is far from being over
...and that's exactly what he does, how is that so hard to understand?!?
He says he has no intention to leave, if you want me gone you have to pay up.
Of course he would like to play elsewhere, but that's called negotiation tactics.
If both parties stand by their position, he'll stay here.
No, they failed because they're not very good at football..
It's not as hard to sell someone of laportes quality, even with his injury problems.
If it was "simples" why isn't everyone doing that?
No chance of that then
That was changed in 2011 - 5 is the number now
I think that as the window edges closer, and assuming West Ham haven't bought a player for that position, a deal will get done.
Have you not worked out that he does not want to leave?
The 10 appearances requirement has been scrapped and he appeared in 16 games for us last season anyway. It was never about ‘full’ games anyway.
He is a couple injuries away from being a starter. Varane is quite injury prone so it’s really about either Martinez or Lindelof being injured at the same time.
Not exactly. He wants to receive double wages from both clubs essentially.
If he doesn’t want to leave then we should freeze him until he changes his mind.
I wouldn’t pay his full wages to leave as this creates dangerous precedent. If he wants the pay check - ok, but it means no match practice.
I'm not talking about what he said in public, if it was SAF he would have called him into his office and told him either you feck of or train with the under 19 team.
Get the contact details of that guy who made that Michael Owen brochure.
Because clubs cave into agents and players demands...if a few of the bigger ones stopped doing it then others may follow suit.
While it continues clubs can be stuck with a rapidly diminished asset for 4-5 yrs so it is in their interest to change it.
And Lindelof has a long-term back problem
“Toughest opponent i’ve ever faced” - David de Gea
FFP plays a part but it's swings and roundabouts, it's harder to get rid of the ones you want to get rid of with longer contacts but it also makes it harder to keep the ones you do want to if they're on shorter contracts
No, we live in the real worldBunch of killjoys, all of you.
Well, it probably helped.
They could offer another 3yr contract to a player in their 2nd year if th player is performing because offering these 5-6 yr contracts from the outset is madness IMO
I had completely forgotten that blue shirt with yellow shorts kit. Half these moments feel like a lifetime ago. Some of the incidents I don't blame him for, like the two deflected goals, but beyond those it's a telling compilation.