Rolaholic
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2016
- Messages
- 12,746
Being so underwhelming at your job that you're offered 10M to leaveHow?
Being so underwhelming at your job that you're offered 10M to leaveHow?
Why do we always have to pay wages and other payments to get rid of our players while other teams get paid money for their?Why? There are many players that just need getting off the books.
WIlliams, Telles, Donny, Bailly, Maguire etc.
Maguire is on 190k a week. The type of team that would buy him just won't pay it.Why do we always have to pay wages and other payments to get rid of our players while other teams get paid money for their?
Maguire is on 190k a week. The type of team that would buy him just won't pay it.
TrueI'd say if Maguire holds out he could get twenty
Because we give them high wages that other clubs won't match, saw Vidic saying not long ago his only regret is missing out on the contracts Ed Woodward was giving outWhy do we always have to pay wages and other payments to get rid of our players while other teams get paid money for their?
Maguire is on 190k a week. The type of team that would buy him just won't pay it.
Because we give them high wages that other clubs won't match, saw Vidic saying not long ago his only regret is missing out on the contracts Ed Woodward was giving out
Why do we always have to pay wages and other payments to get rid of our players while other teams get paid money for their?
If he threatens to play he might get 30!True
I've never seen anything that suggests that Maguire has ever said he wants to leave, the fans want him gone and career wise it probably makes sense but he hasn't pushed for it, yetI find it hard to believe we have to pay him to leave when he wants to leave and his wages are not crazy and we can just set a low transfer fee that loads of clubs would snap our hands of for without having to actually pay Maguire off
One issue has been our tendency to dish out long-term contracts with ridiculous wages to bang average players who will only ever serve to plug a short term gap. I can see a similar situation arising with Dalot in a couple of years.Why do we always have to pay wages and other payments to get rid of our players while other teams get paid money for their?
Maguire is on 190k a week. The type of team that would buy him just won't pay it.
One issue has been our tendency to dish out long-term contracts with ridiculous wages to bang average players who will only ever serve to plug a short term gap. I can see a similar situation arising with Dalot in a couple of years.
I know. We’ll still have to pay him off though.I can see Maguire being the next Phil Jones, I mean he has a cast-iron contract on big money at a famous club. Unless he is a massive patriot and thinks he has the ability to with the World Cup with England (unlikely) why not just stay at United and hope injuries to others get him back onto the pitch for a few games a season. It is what I would do!
Maybe longer, hasn't Dalot just signed a new contract?
Self defeating, other players would hear about it and it might deter them from considering joining usWhere is the ruthlessness from the club? Just say, “Look Harry lad, you are never playing for this club again. If you want to play footie at a pro level next season, you better accept whatever contract is offered elsewhere. Best of luck”. Then accept literally any transfer offer and throw him in the reserves if he prefers that.
Or is that too harsh and against club values?
Self defeating, other players would hear about it and it might deter them from considering joining us
That’s what I was referring to. His new contract will keep him here until 2028, but if we improve as a team the way I want us to, I can see him being surplus to requirements long before that time is up, and I just can’t see wealthy clubs competing to take him off us.Maybe longer, hasn't Dalot just signed a new contract?
Self defeating, other players would hear about it and it might deter them from considering joining us
True but he must know he is not in ten hag plans and what good is it to him sitting on the bench for 80% of next season with a euros around the corner, there is surely a breaking point with southgate dropping him unless he is that much stuck in his ways of selecting the same old players despite playing time and for harry it will not do him any favours long term to see out his contract as he would end up struggling to find a top half club to take him fon well into his 30's with little playing time for good wages.I've never seen anything that suggests that Maguire has ever said he wants to leave, the fans want him gone and career wise it probably makes sense but he hasn't pushed for it, yet
I have no idea where the 10 million comes from, for all any of us know it might be in his contract, I'm certain Maguire is looking out for his interests and what he wants not what United or us fans deem is wanted or neededAnd the other way is better? Join United play shit and they will pay you to leave when the time comes.
Stick him in reserves. No way should we be subsidising his exit. He can then go to a new team and get a hefty sign on fee cos he will be free. What a win for him, if all of this is true.
If they see themselves in Maguire, we don't want themSelf defeating, other players would hear about it and it might deter them from considering joining us
If they see what happens if you fall out of favor they'll never arrive, Maguire isn't a bad player, he just doesn't fit the way we want to play now, that's not his faultIf they see themselves in Maguire, we don't want them
That incident was three years ago. So he was a ‘wall’ for one year.He was a wall for us for a good long while. Thought we’d be great when Varane came in as a perfect partner. Ever since Greece he’s been disappointing.
If I was a player, I'd see that as an outstanding move by an organization who wants to win.Self defeating, other players would hear about it and it might deter them from considering joining us