Seriously all this we don't have money.talk is tiresome, Ferguson just to save some money wont again compromise on the GK spot again.
Stekelenburg is as much of a risk as De Gea is, if one of them is £15m cheaper the money WILL be a factor.
Seriously all this we don't have money.talk is tiresome, Ferguson just to save some money wont again compromise on the GK spot again.
What else is he supposed to do? He works on a budget, he has probably been told long ago that there is a certain amount of money available and if he feels we need to strengthen other areas, he might have to opt for cheaper solutions. It's not like it would be the first time Ferguson buys a cheaper goalkeeper, we've tried that numerous times.
I think Neuer was our first choice but he wouldn't come here. Other than him I don't see a goalkeeper that would be a certain success, even De Gea who is impressive might not be the one and he'd probably cost £20m as they realise we need a GK badly and will try to squeeze every penny out of this transaction . Stekelenburg will be as much of a risk as De Gea, and if he's £15m cheaper then it might be worth a try ].
Fergie has stated many times that getting the best possible keeper is vital after the post- Schmikes farce. I think the money he deems is necessary will be the budget, we've been very frugal the last 2 seasons but Fergie has said he will buy marquee players when VDS, Scholes and Giggs go. Personally I have a concern over our midfield yet we are in the CL final and on the verge of winning the Prem with said midfield, so I don't see Fergie sacrificing his first choice keeper for any other area.
I agree, however i don't have any idea about who should replace VdS
Fergie has stated many times that getting the best possible keeper is vital after the post- Schmikes farce. I think the money he deems is necessary will be the budget, we've been very frugal the last 2 seasons but Fergie has said he will buy marquee players when VDS, Scholes and Giggs go. Personally I have a concern over our midfield yet we are in the CL final and on the verge of winning the Prem with said midfield, so I don't see Fergie sacrificing his first choice keeper for any other area.
I don't think we would necessarily save the money if it was a choice between Neuer and Stekelenburg, but when Atletico wants circa £20m for a player with slightly more than a season of professional football under his belt opting for a £6m international who performed well at the World Cup might not be such a bad idea at all, even if his potential might not be equal to that of De Gea's. Goalkeepers are ALWAYS a risk, if we pay £20m for De Gea and he crumbles under the pressure in his first few weeks here it might be £20m down the drain. And between buying Stekelenburg for £6m and buying a midfielder for £15m to £20m, and buying De Gea for £20m and no one else I know exactly which I'd prefer.
I don't think we would necessarily save the money if it was a choice between Neuer and Stekelenburg, but when Atletico wants circa £20m for a player with slightly more than a season of professional football under his belt opting for a £6m international who performed well at the World Cup might not be such a bad idea at all, even if his potential might not be equal to that of De Gea's. Goalkeepers are ALWAYS a risk, if we pay £20m for De Gea and he crumbles under the pressure in his first few weeks here it might be £20m down the drain. And between buying Stekelenburg for £6m and buying a midfielder for £15m to £20m, and buying De Gea for £20m and no one else I know exactly which I'd prefer.
Read my posts! I said we might spend big on a keeper if there's a safe option available, however the only one I can think of is Neuer and he doesn't want to come here. De Gea is nowhere near safe, neither is someone like Lloris or Adler and they would all cost a fortune, so why not go for a cheaper option who has as much of a chance of making it as them?
But yes, I don't think we'll spend heavy in the Summer.
Aye. £160m doesn't go far these days.
You don't think we'll spend much this summer because we are skint which, as it happens, we aren't.
There are various reasons why I think we won't spend heavily, but yes, I don't think we have that much money to spend and money in the bank doesn't equal transfer budget, it's not Football Manager.
True and I wouldn't trust Gill much, however Sir Alex says he can have whatever money he deems fit as he always has in the past, and I am willing to trust him until I see concrete proof he's lying.
We can sign one big money player, perhaps two if he wants it badly, but there will be nothing close to a spending that is being predicted by some sources (i.e. £80m, £100m etc.).
As I said, it won't necessarily be a goalkeeper because I don't think there's a goalkeeper worth that money in the market. If someone like Casillas was available, we'd bid £20m, even £25m for him but De Gea?
Best value for money around, over the long-term will be Craig Gordon ... probably get him for 6-9million, or if Ferguson waits he'll be free next again season 12/13.
He has the temperament, makes very few mistakes and is one of the best shot-stoppers around ... certainly looks better in this respect than any of those talked about here.
No senior figures at United would state our primary target so openly.
Best value for money around, over the long-term will be Craig Gordon ... probably get him for 6-9million, or if Ferguson waits he'll be free next again season 12/13.
He has the temperament, makes very few mistakes and is one of the best shot-stoppers around ... certainly looks better in this respect than any of those talked about here.
Best value for money around, over the long-term will be Craig Gordon ... probably get him for 6-9million, or if Ferguson waits he'll be free next again season 12/13.
He has the temperament, makes very few mistakes and is one of the best shot-stoppers around ... certainly looks better in this respect than any of those talked about here.
He`s out for 6 months AGAIN and is only number two at Sunderland.
Bruce thinks so, Gordon was many times on the bench and Mignolet was in the goal.He is injury prone but he is no way second in line at Sunderland. Do you mean to say Mignolet is better than Gordon?
Bruce thinks so, Gordon was many times on the bench and Mignolet was in the goal.
I think Gordon is better than Mignolet.
What about Julio Cesar pf Inter?
He is pretty under-rated.
Gordon's been on the bench because they were nursing his knee injury.
Diego Lopez is a decent suggestion actually. He is a very solid keeper. How old is he?
What is important to Manchester United and other topclubs is not to have the best goalkeeper in the world - it is not really required.
The important thing is to have a keeper who is solid in the air, makes few mistakes and is good with the ball at his feet.
It doesn't matter if he drops 2-3 goals that a world-class goalkeeper on the line could have saved.
In a club like United - you just need a solid goalkeeper you can depend on - most matches you are not required to make many saves. You are just required to do what is expected of you - and NOT to make mistake