endless_wheelies
feeling dizzy
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2014
- Messages
- 3,224
If you want to message him just use ed.woodward@manutd.co.ukDoes Woodward have an official Twitter account?
If you want to message him just use ed.woodward@manutd.co.ukDoes Woodward have an official Twitter account?
I'm shocked. If he is still here next season we should direct our attention to Ed, I doubt his skin is as thick as Van Gaals.Probably 5 teams in the CL from England next season and we won't be one of them. How in the hell is this guy still in charge?
Forget all that, the fact of the matter is he should of handed most of that back after the state of this season. We are the most boring and predictable team in Europe. I wish we could play Faroe Islands, I bet he would be out thought tactically by the postman an an accountant.£8m salary and United must pay £5m to sack him
Louis van Gaal will lose out on more than £1 million of his annual salary at Manchester United if his side fail to qualify for next season’s Champions League.
The Times has learnt that more than half of Van Gaal’s £8 million annual package is based on a series of performance-related, loyalty and image rights clauses. The Dutchman will get a £400,000 bonus if United win the FA Cup and a £5 million payoff if he is sacked at the end of the season.
The Times can reveal details of Van Gaal’s contract for the first time, a week after he insisted that United pressurised him into signing a three rather than two-year deal, a claim that is contested by others at Old Trafford.
Of Van Gaal’s £8 million-a-year contract he signed in May 2014, only £3.3 million is guaranteed as basic pay. The rest of the package is made up of a £2 million loyalty payment, £1.6 million for image rights and £1.1 million for taking United into the Champions League. All those sums were paid last year after United finished fourth in Van Gaal’s first season at Old Trafford, but the Champions League payment is in jeopardy this season because his side are fifth in the Barclays Premier League, four points behind fourth-placed Manchester City but with a game in hand.
In addition to his salary Van Gaal can earn a series of payments based on the team’s performance, although only the FA Cup-winning bonus remains in play this season, with United meeting Crystal Palace at Wembley on May 21. There is no bonus for reaching the final.
A further indication of the dim view United will take of failing to qualify for the Champions League is found in the fact that winning the Europa League would earn Van Gaal £400,00, the same as winning the FA Cup, although there is a £200,000 bonus payment should he reach the final of the secondary European competition.
Van Gaal has already missed out on potential bonuses this season of £1.5 million for winning the Champions League, £1.5 million for winning the Premier League — finishing second in either competition would have earned him £750,000 — and £200,000 for winning the Capital One Cup.
The 64-year-old’s contract also stipulates a further £400,000 bonus for winning the Fifa Club World Cup and £200,000 for winning the Uefa Super Cup, although it is unlikely he will ever take United in to either competition.
The Times has also learnt the details of Van Gaal’s payoff should he be sacked at the end of the season, which remains the expectation despite his defiance last week when he insisted that he would see out the final year of his contract. The severance terms of that contract entitle him to 66 per cent of his existing salary unless he gets another job in football before June 2017, in which case the payments would cease. If he is sacked United will continue to pay Van Gaal two thirds of his salary — including the loyalty and image rights elements — on a monthly basis so it will cost them approximately £5 million to dismiss him.
The financial cost of sacking Van Gaal is not thought to be a factor as the club consider his future. While his success in bringing talented youngsters such as Marcus Rashford and Timothy Fosu-Mensah into the first team in recent months counts in his favour there remain concerns over Van Gaal’s style of football and a dictatorial approach that has alienated senior players, in addition to the probability of missing out on the Champions League for the second time in three years.
José Mourinho has made it clear he wants the United job, but the club will not be forced into making such an appointment. The Portuguese would demand wages of between £10 million and £12 million a year and it is unclear whether he would accept the salary structure agreed by Van Gaal.
Ronaldo, the former Brazil striker, had praise for Rashford. “He’s a very good player,” he told The Sun. “I see myself in him. He has an amazing future.”
If that scenario actually happens, Woodward should receive a God-like status within the club and deservedly so. If he manages to land Griezmann-Hummels-Kante to OT (most likely) without CL football to offer but by magically convincing them to join what seems to be a very problematic first team and play under a manager who has made little to none progress in two whole seasons, he would definitely be the best thing that has happened to this club since Busby and Ferguson.
I'm not trying to have a dig at you, i just believe that the image a club wants to project, the manager, the state of the squad and the possible transfer targets are extremely interdependent. Right now we want to establish ourselves as a non sacking club that likes to develop talented youngsters instead of buying ready-made products and wants to plan for the future. There's nothing wrong with that per se but when you're looking at it from the pov of an outsider, the context is somewhat different. When Bayern Munich, who are toying with the Bundesliga, get Ancelotti, passing by the opportunity to appoint Mourinho (or keeping LvG at the helm) doesn't look good in general.
If Hummels wanted to be the leader of a young team, he would have stayed at BvB. But at the age of 28 he handed in a transfer request and he wants to go to Bayern Munich because that's where the trophies will probably go in Germany. Grieamann might have a champions league medal around his neck by the end of May. Why should he join a club that can't even offer him CL football?
These players care about two things (besides money): enjoying their football and challenging for all major honors. We can offer none of these things atm. We can only offer the high wages. If we had a strong first team, maybe these players would consider coming here. The other thing we can do is appoint a new manager (doesn't necessarily have to be Jose), "sell" a fresh start in order to attract world class players and show the outside world that we care about the present as much as for the future. It will need a lot of persuading to make world class players come here to endure a year of LvG with a high possibility of Giggs becoming the next manager. And the mix of young, talented but inexperienced youngsters and underachieving senior players that is our squad isn't helping things at all.
Image rights?!! I have a bag of spuds in the cupboard, do I owe LVG money?!
Rival fans?"He's great, give him an extension"
Curious are those 58 members banned and that's why they haven't changed their vote? Who in their right mind would want to give LVG an extension.
Rival fans?
I am not angry about Liverpool getting to the EL final. Good luck to them, but it is the fact that it has highlighted for everyone to see, the complete incompetence of our board and especially the manager. That hurts.I'm part of a local United fan group that are almost all looking to boycott games and buying merchandise if this cretin is still in charge next season.
I should be able to get a good 60-70 people to bombard the United Twitter page buts it will probably need 60-70 thousand to get them to bat an eyelid.
I'm just so angry right now. Watching Liverpool reach a European cup final has brought it home once again how incompetent the United board are.
Ha ha, only if you take a photo of it and put it on a t shirt.Image rights?!! I have a bag of spuds in the cupboard, do I owe LVG money?!
If you want to message him just use ed.woodward@manutd.co.uk
I am not angry about Liverpool getting to the EL final. Good luck to them, but it is the fact that it has highlighted for everyone to see, the complete incompetence of our board and especially the manager. That hurts.
I want him out so badly, ....
I think that makes it pretty obvious why we didn't sack in December. His position to the organization was not untenable. In the fans eyes, that is probably different and fair enough. But imagine the logistical issue of changing the manager at a club like United.The Times has also learnt the details of Van Gaal’s payoff should he be sacked at the end of the season, which remains the expectation despite his defiance last week when he insisted that he would see out the final year of his contract. The severance terms of that contract entitle him to 66 per cent of his existing salary unless he gets another job in football before June 2017, in which case the payments would cease. If he is sacked United will continue to pay Van Gaal two thirds of his salary — including the loyalty and image rights elements — on a monthly basis so it will cost them approximately £5 million to dismiss him.
"I stay. Happy holidays and see you next year".3 more weeks. Just 3 more weeks. My god 3 more weeks!
We are the most boring and predictable team in Europe. I wish we could play Faroe Islands, I bet he would be out thought tactically by the postman an an accountant.
"I stay. Happy holidays and see you next year".
If you want to message him just use ed.woodward@manutd.co.uk
Spending £5m to get rid of this could be the best bit of month we spend this summer.
Spending £5m to get rid of this could be the best bit of month we spend this summer.
Get the Kickstarter going. I reckon we'd get several player contributions!
I think the most dangerous thing I have heard from Ed is when he stated, like Liverpool, you don't have to compete at the very top to stay relevant and generate revenue/profit. Not a thing I like to hear from a guy in charge of football matters at this club. If Mourinho is not hired Ed should be the target of our anger and frustration. If we must resign ourselves to another below average season and Van Gaal then a position of not giving a toss and keeping our money in our pockets should be adopted by the supporters. Let's turn our attention towards the board Real Madrid style and force a change. I fear we will miss the boat on some world class managerial quality and have to settle for a third tier manager or Giggs with this direction and the club maybe left in a position that will take a generation to recover from.
My light in the darkness has always been the total lack of vocal support coming from the hierarchy for Van Gaal. It seems it's just Louis that is backing Louis, which is so Louis. I think Woodward is afraid of a confrontation with him especially in public which is inevitable with Van Gaal. With no clear statement made by the club with the season drawing to a close I'm encouraged. No matter what happens between now and the last kick Van Gaal has done nothing to warrant one more second as manager of this football club. He was hired to halt our slide and stop us being the butt of jokes from all corners of the game. He has made us worse in every possible way regardless of the youth, which is the only redeeming feature of his tenure but he fell in to that arse first through his own negligence. I just don't think he is capable in managing a club of this size in the modern game, it's like we hired an Alan Curbishly, a decent manager from a different time. Bayern, Barca and Ajax released the hounds because of what we are witnessing now yet our board cowered behind their leather chairs.
I have said before that it's a smart move to stick with until the end of the season and then wave goodbye but that leaves millions of supporters at the mercy of those miserable jackals in the media. I'm not to sure what the club could say to us to put everyone's mind at ease and satisfy all parties. I will have renewed faith in the board if we go with Mourinho. I believe we will have a system and plan in place to rival the best. But if we stick with the current shit on a stick, well, I don't know what I would do. Very confused at the moment.
The trainer I learned most from about the field of play was Van Gaal, even though he’s the one I’ve had the most confrontations with – well, disagreements. He’s got an obsession with work ethic, the way he plans. Maybe I preferred a lighter style to his.
I don't think Van Gaals methods have evolved to the modern game. Back in Enrique's day if you work hard you reap the rewards. There were far more world class players around then but now we have players like Raheem Sterling and Theo Walcot, multi million pound contracts and transfer fees and still muck compared to players like Giggs, Figo and Nedved. The problem is more pronounced in England with clubs charging the English premium for players that would struggle in Seria B. There were less distractions back then and I could tell you everything about every player in my Panini sticker book. No there is mostly run of the mill players who couldn't care less because they are earning upwards of sixty grand a week when there skill level is more deserving of five. Im a bit of an old moaning bastard today so I will end this post by blaming it on video games. It's the bloody video games!Just saw a 2015 interview with Luis Enrique in which he said:
Maybe, just maybe, he is not the clueless moron that everyone in this thread is saying he is.
He has made some strange decisions and the results have not be nearly good enough - let alone the style of play.
But we have been like that for a few years now.
Still, it was his job to change that.
We have spent pretty poorly in the transfer market. A lot of the deadwood has been moved on only to be replaced by more deadwood.
I am of the belief that no manager could comfortably bag top 4 even with this squad.
And that is LVGs fault. But it is also partly Woody's, partly Moyes' and also partly Fergie's as he allowed the quality and age profile of the squad to steadily decline from 2009.
I think most know that history will show him an excellent manager. However, it appears he is simply a poor match for the club, and 10 years too late for the premier league. The only stereotypical box ticked is the youth players, and could argue that was accidental.Just saw a 2015 interview with Luis Enrique in which he said:
Maybe, just maybe, he is not the clueless moron that everyone in this thread is saying he is.
He has made some strange decisions and the results have not be nearly good enough - let alone the style of play.
But we have been like that for a few years now.
Still, it was his job to change that.
We have spent pretty poorly in the transfer market. A lot of the deadwood has been moved on only to be replaced by more deadwood.
I am of the belief that no manager could comfortably bag top 4 even with this squad.
And that is LVGs fault. But it is also partly Woody's, partly Moyes' and also partly Fergie's as he allowed the quality and age profile of the squad to steadily decline from 2009.
Just saw a 2015 interview with Luis Enrique in which he said:
Maybe, just maybe, he is not the clueless moron that everyone in this thread is saying he is.
He has made some strange decisions and the results have not be nearly good enough - let alone the style of play.
But we have been like that for a few years now.
Still, it was his job to change that.
We have spent pretty poorly in the transfer market. A lot of the deadwood has been moved on only to be replaced by more deadwood.
I am of the belief that no manager could comfortably bag top 4 even with this squad.
And that is LVGs fault. But it is also partly Woody's, partly Moyes' and also partly Fergie's as he allowed the quality and age profile of the squad to steadily decline from 2009.
I am actually starting to worry he might be here next season.
Would be seriously depressing going into the first game with him as manager.
Another reason why it would be foolish to stick with him. He's not going to change. I don't think he has the desire nor energy to adapt to modern players. It'll just be the same as always, him trying to bend everyone to his will and not applying tact in dealing with certain personalities, and thereby getting the best out of them. It doesn't matter how many talented players you buy, if you can't get them to believe in what you're doing.I'm sure he know's his stuff.. the players of today just don't react well to it.. Enrique himself in that statement said it didn't work for him!! Doesn't mean he can't learn.
Image rights?!! I have a bag of spuds in the cupboard, do I owe LVG money?!
We're not going to crack 50 goals in the Prem, very unlikely to be top 4 so no CL next year and we went out in the group stage in the CL this past year. Making/Winning the FA Cup is nice, but we beat Shrewsbury, Derby, Sheffield and the 11th and 6th placed Prem teams (6th in a replay), so it's hardly an indicator of us being anything more than a top-half Prem team, really.
It's good that he's played youth and given a real chance to Rashford, CBJ, McNair and Fosu-Mensah, but that seems like more of a positive to move forward for the next manager than an indication he should stay. It's not like we have a bunch of obvious stars about to push through that we need to blood in.
I still think Mourinho will be here in the summer. His record is incredible and he seems to really want the job.
50 goals over 38 games, two of which were against shambolic Villa team.
Incredible to.score so few.