I understood your point. I was just disagreeing with a part of it in that Rashford didn't do better than a Lukaku in terrible form for most of the season.
Additionally, positions are irrelevant here because Rashford had more shots per game than Lukaku. Looking at just the league, Rashford had 49 shots inside the box whereas Lukaku had 52. Not a massive difference.
Since I didn't say that Rashford did better, I'm not sure who you are disagreeing with. And again the point isn't about comparing Lukaku to Rashford, I answered a question about which striker we should bring if Lukaku was sold and I said that I would bring a wide forward instead.